view tests/test-double-merge.t @ 29917:f32f8bf5dc4c

streamclone: force @filecache properties to be reloaded from file

Before this patch, consumev1() invokes repo.invalidate() after closing
transaction, to force @filecache properties to be reloaded from files
at next access, because streamclone writes data into files directly.

But this doesn't work as expected in the case below:

  1. at closing transaction, repo._refreshfilecachestats() refreshes
     file stat of each @filecache properties with streamclone-ed files

     This means that in-memory properties are treated as valid.

  2. but streamclone doesn't changes in-memory properties

     This means that in-memory properties are actually invalid.

  3. repo.invalidate() just forces to examine file stat of @filecache
     properties at the first access after it

     Such examination should concludes that reloading from file isn't
     needed, because file stat was already refreshed at (1).

     Therefore, invalid in-memory cached properties (2) are
     unintentionally treated as valid (1).

This patch invokes repo.invalidate() with clearfilecache=True, to
force @filecache properties to be reloaded from file at next access.

BTW, it is accidental that repo.invalidate() without
clearfilecache=True in streamclone case seems to work as expected
before this patch.

If transaction is started via "filtered repo" object,
repo._refreshfilecachestats() tries to refresh file stat of each
@filecache properties on "filtered repo" object, even though all of
them are stored into "unfiltered repo" object.

In this case, repo._refreshfilecachestats() does nothing
unintentionally, but this unexpected behavior causes reloading
@filecache properties after repo.invalidate().

This is reason why this patch should be applied before making
_refreshfilecachestats() correctly refresh file stat of @filecache
properties.

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ echo line 1 > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

copy foo to bar and change both files
  $ hg cp foo bar
  $ echo line 2-1 >> foo
  $ echo line 2-2 >> bar
  $ hg ci -m 'cp foo bar; change both'

in another branch, change foo in a way that doesn't conflict with
the other changes
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo line 0 > foo
  $ hg cat foo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

we get conflicts that shouldn't be there
  $ hg merge -P
  changeset:   1:484bf6903104
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     cp foo bar; change both
  
  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in other:
     bar
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'foo' -> dst: 'bar' *
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: e6dc8efe11cc, local: 6a0df1dad128+, remote: 484bf6903104
   preserving foo for resolve of bar
   preserving foo for resolve of foo
  starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
   bar: remote copied from foo -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for bar (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging foo and bar to bar
  my bar@6a0df1dad128+ other bar@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
   foo: versions differ -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for foo (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging foo
  my foo@6a0df1dad128+ other foo@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

contents of foo
  $ cat foo
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-1

contents of bar
  $ cat bar
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-2

  $ cd ..