view tests/test-patch.t @ 29917:f32f8bf5dc4c

streamclone: force @filecache properties to be reloaded from file

Before this patch, consumev1() invokes repo.invalidate() after closing
transaction, to force @filecache properties to be reloaded from files
at next access, because streamclone writes data into files directly.

But this doesn't work as expected in the case below:

  1. at closing transaction, repo._refreshfilecachestats() refreshes
     file stat of each @filecache properties with streamclone-ed files

     This means that in-memory properties are treated as valid.

  2. but streamclone doesn't changes in-memory properties

     This means that in-memory properties are actually invalid.

  3. repo.invalidate() just forces to examine file stat of @filecache
     properties at the first access after it

     Such examination should concludes that reloading from file isn't
     needed, because file stat was already refreshed at (1).

     Therefore, invalid in-memory cached properties (2) are
     unintentionally treated as valid (1).

This patch invokes repo.invalidate() with clearfilecache=True, to
force @filecache properties to be reloaded from file at next access.

BTW, it is accidental that repo.invalidate() without
clearfilecache=True in streamclone case seems to work as expected
before this patch.

If transaction is started via "filtered repo" object,
repo._refreshfilecachestats() tries to refresh file stat of each
@filecache properties on "filtered repo" object, even though all of
them are stored into "unfiltered repo" object.

In this case, repo._refreshfilecachestats() does nothing
unintentionally, but this unexpected behavior causes reloading
@filecache properties after repo.invalidate().

This is reason why this patch should be applied before making
_refreshfilecachestats() correctly refresh file stat of @filecache
properties.

  $ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > print 'Using custom patch'
  > if '--binary' in sys.argv:
  >     print '--binary found !'
  > EOF

  $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
  adding a
  $ echo b >> a
  $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
  $ cd ..

This test checks that:
 - custom patch commands with arguments actually work
 - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
 --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
 --binary is added by default under win32.

check custom patch options are honored

  $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
  $ hg clone -r 0 a b
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
  applying ../a.diff
  Using custom patch
  applied to working directory

Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description

Prepare source repo and patch:

  $ rm $HGRCPATH
  $ hg init c
  $ cd c
  $ printf "a\rc" > a
  $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
  $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
  $ cat << eof > log
  > first line which can't start with '# '
  > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  > # HG changeset patch
  > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  > eof
  $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
  $ hg export -o p 1
  $ cd ..

Clone and apply patch:

  $ hg clone -r 0 c d
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd d
  $ hg import ../c/p
  applying ../c/p
  $ hg log -v -r 1
  changeset:   1:cd0bde79c428
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       a
  description:
  first line which can't start with '# '
  # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  # HG changeset patch
  # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  
  
  $ cd ..