tests/test-fix-metadata.t

phabricator: add --blocker argument to phabsend to specify blocking reviewers

The way to signal to Conduit that a reviewer is considered blocking is just to
wrap their PHID in "blocking()" when including it in the list of PHIDs passed
to `reviewers.add`.

arc doesn't have a --blocker, instead one is supposed to append a '!' to the
end of reviewer names (I think reviewers are usually added in an editor rather
than the command line, where '!'s can be more hazardous).

moz-phab (Mozilla's arcanist wrapper) does have a --blocker argument, and being
explicit like this is also more discoverable. Even `arc diff`'s help doesn't
seem to mention the reviewer! syntax.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6512

A python hook for "hg fix" that prints out the number of files and revisions
that were affected, along with which fixer tools were applied. Also checks how
many times it sees a specific key generated by one of the fixer tools defined
below.

  $ cat >> $TESTTMP/postfixhook.py <<EOF
  > import collections
  > def file(ui, repo, rev=None, path=b'', metadata=None, **kwargs):
  >   ui.status(b'fixed %s in revision %d using %s\n' %
  >             (path, rev, b', '.join(metadata.keys())))
  > def summarize(ui, repo, replacements=None, wdirwritten=False,
  >               metadata=None, **kwargs):
  >     counts = collections.defaultdict(int)
  >     keys = 0
  >     for fixername, metadatalist in metadata.items():
  >         for metadata in metadatalist:
  >             if metadata is None:
  >                 continue
  >             counts[fixername] += 1
  >             if 'key' in metadata:
  >                 keys += 1
  >     ui.status(b'saw "key" %d times\n' % (keys,))
  >     for name, count in sorted(counts.items()):
  >         ui.status(b'fixed %d files with %s\n' % (count, name))
  >     if replacements:
  >         ui.status(b'fixed %d revisions\n' % (len(replacements),))
  >     if wdirwritten:
  >         ui.status(b'fixed the working copy\n')
  > EOF

Some mock output for fixer tools that demonstrate what could go wrong with
expecting the metadata output format.

  $ printf 'new content\n' > $TESTTMP/missing
  $ printf 'not valid json\0new content\n' > $TESTTMP/invalid
  $ printf '{"key": "value"}\0new content\n' > $TESTTMP/valid

Configure some fixer tools based on the output defined above, and enable the
hooks defined above. Disable parallelism to make output of the parallel file
processing phase stable.

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > fix =
  > [fix]
  > missing:command=cat $TESTTMP/missing
  > missing:pattern=missing
  > missing:metadata=true
  > invalid:command=cat $TESTTMP/invalid
  > invalid:pattern=invalid
  > invalid:metadata=true
  > valid:command=cat $TESTTMP/valid
  > valid:pattern=valid
  > valid:metadata=true
  > [hooks]
  > postfixfile = python:$TESTTMP/postfixhook.py:file
  > postfix = python:$TESTTMP/postfixhook.py:summarize
  > [worker]
  > enabled=false
  > EOF

See what happens when we execute each of the fixer tools. Some print warnings,
some write back to the file.

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ printf "old content\n" > invalid
  $ printf "old content\n" > missing
  $ printf "old content\n" > valid
  $ hg add -q

  $ hg fix -w
  ignored invalid output from fixer tool: invalid
  ignored invalid output from fixer tool: missing
  fixed valid in revision 2147483647 using valid
  saw "key" 1 times
  fixed 1 files with valid
  fixed the working copy

  $ cat missing invalid valid
  old content
  old content
  new content

  $ cd ..