view tests/test-empty-file.t @ 42406:f385ba70e4af

changelog: optionally store added and removed files in changeset extras As mentioned in an earlier patch, copies._chain() is used a lot in the changeset-centric version of pathcopies(). It is expensive because it needs to look at the manifest in order to filter out copies whose target file has since been removed. I want to store the sets of added and removed files in the changeset in order to speed that up. This patch does the writing part of that. It could easily be a separate config, but it's currently tied to experimental.copies.write-to since that's the only real use case (it will also make the {file_*} template keywords faster, but I doubt that anyone cares enough about those to write extra metadata for them). The new information is stored in the changeset extras. Since they're always subsets of the changeset's "files" list, they're stored as indexes into that list. I've stored the indexes as stringified ints separated by NUL bytes. The size of 00changelog.d for the hg repo increased in size by 0.28% percent (compared to the size with only copy information in the changesets, which in turn is 0.17% larger than without copy information). We could store only the delta between the indexes and we could store them in binary, but the chosen format is more readable. We could also have implemented this as a cache outside the changelog. One advantage of doing it that way is that we would get the speedups from the {file_*} template keywords also on old repos. Another advantage is that it we can rewrite the cache if we find a bug in how we calculate the set of files. A disadvantage is that it would be more complex. Another is that it would surely use more space. We already write the copy information to the changeset extras, so it seems like a small step to also write these file sets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6416
author Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
date Tue, 14 May 2019 22:19:51 -0700
parents f2719b387380
children
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ touch empty1
  $ hg add empty1
  $ hg commit -m 'add empty1'

  $ touch empty2
  $ hg add empty2
  $ hg commit -m 'add empty2'

  $ hg up -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ touch empty3
  $ hg add empty3
  $ hg commit -m 'add empty3'
  created new head

  $ hg heads
  changeset:   2:a1cb177e0d44
  tag:         tip
  parent:      0:1e1d9c4e5b64
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     add empty3
  
  changeset:   1:097d2b0e17f6
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     add empty2
  

  $ hg merge 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

Before changeset 05257fd28591, we didn't notice the
empty file that came from rev 1:

  $ hg status
  M empty2
  $ hg commit -m merge
  $ hg manifest --debug tip
  b80de5d138758541c5f05265ad144ab9fa86d1db 644   empty1
  b80de5d138758541c5f05265ad144ab9fa86d1db 644   empty2
  b80de5d138758541c5f05265ad144ab9fa86d1db 644   empty3

  $ cd ..