tests/test-issue619.t
author Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com>
Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:15:51 -0700
changeset 23032 f484be02bd35
parent 15615 41885892796e
child 23413 0c432696dae3
permissions -rw-r--r--
lock: while releasing, unlink lockfile even if the release function throws Consider a hypothetical bug in the release function that causes it to raise an exception. Also consider the bisect command, which saves its state in a finally clause. Saving the state requires acquiring the wlock. If we don't unlink the lockfile when the exception is thrown, we'll try to acquire the wlock again. We're going to try and acquire a lock again while our old lockfile is on disk. The PID on disk is our own, and of course we're still running, so we won't take over the lock. Hence we'll be stuck waiting for a lock that we left behind ourselves. To avoid this, always unlink the lockfile. This preserves the invariant that self.held > 0 is equivalent to the lockfile existing on disk.

http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue619

  $ hg init
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -Ama
  adding a

  $ echo b > b
  $ hg branch b
  marked working directory as branch b
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
  $ hg ci -Amb
  adding b

  $ hg co -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Fast-forward:

  $ hg merge b
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -Ammerge

Bogus fast-forward should fail:

  $ hg merge b
  abort: merging with a working directory ancestor has no effect
  [255]