Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-bisect2.t @ 37153:f51c2780db3a
test-lfs-test-server: add a testcase for `hg serve`
I haven't figured out yet how to make the authentication checks work for a
specific list of users, so the 'web.allow-push' list is wildcarded. (It appears
that the client doesn't react to a 401 by sending authentication data, which may
be caused in part by not having all of the headers in httpbasicauthhandler's
http_error_auth_reqed(), compared to a run of test-http.t. But in any case, we
should probably have a separate set of tests for various authentication
scenarios. As it is, without the wildcard, no push access is granted.)
There are several deviations from the `lfs-test-server` case:
- `hg serve` emits a Server header. I think Gregory indicated that this isn't
easily suppressed.
- `hg serve` names the "basic" transfer handler in the Batch API response. Not
having to specify it was for backwards compatability, so this seems like the
right thing to do. (`lfs-test-server` doesn't name it, whether it was
explicitly requested by the client or not.)
- PUT status for a newly created file is 201, per RFC-2616 [1]. The Basic
Transfer API [2] shows an example upload transcript with a 200 response. It
doesn't make much sense to re-upload a file (unless it is corrupt) in an
example, but I wouldn't be surprised if some other implementations also
expect 200 because of this. But the RFC says MUST use 201 for creation.
- The Content-Type for the file transfers is "application/octet-stream", like
the sample transcript (though I don't see it explicitly called out in the
text elsewhere). Using "text/plain" seems clearly wrong.
- `lfs-test-server` isn't removing the action property and sending back an
error code like the spec calls out when a file is missing or corrupt. Doing
so on the `hg serve` side reveals a bug in our client code when handling the
response- it indicates the remote file is missing instead of corrupt around
line 452.
I'll probably glob over the Content-Length differences once this settles down.
Prior to the recent hgweb refactoring, the Batch API response was using chunked
encodings instead.
Back to the RFC, I have no idea if the python framework handles the "MUST NOT
ignore any Content-* (e.g. Content-Range) headers that it does not understand or
implement and MUST return a 501" for a PUT request.
[1] https://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html#sec9.6
[2] https://github.com/git-lfs/git-lfs/blob/master/docs/api/basic-transfers.md#uploads
author | Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 17 Mar 2018 02:37:46 -0400 |
parents | 1b5c61d38a52 |
children | f51ff655d338 |
line wrap: on
line source
# The tests in test-bisect are done on a linear history. Here the # following repository history is used for testing: # # 17 # | # 18 16 # \ / # 15 # / \ # / \ # 10 13 # / \ | # / \ | 14 # 7 6 9 12 / # \ / \ | |/ # 4 \ | 11 # \ \ | / # 3 5 | / # \ / |/ # 2 8 # \ / # 1 # | # 0 init $ hg init committing changes $ echo > a $ echo '0' >> a $ hg add a $ hg ci -m "0" -d "0 0" $ echo '1' >> a $ hg ci -m "1" -d "1 0" $ echo '2' >> a $ hg ci -m "2" -d "2 0" $ echo '3' >> a $ hg ci -m "3" -d "3 0" $ echo '4' >> a $ hg ci -m "4" -d "4 0" create branch $ hg up -r 2 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '5' >> b $ hg add b $ hg ci -m "5" -d "5 0" created new head merge $ hg merge 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg ci -m "merge 4,5" -d "6 0" create branch $ hg up -r 4 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '7' > c $ hg add c $ hg ci -m "7" -d "7 0" created new head create branch $ hg up -r 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '8' > d $ hg add d $ hg ci -m "8" -d "8 0" created new head $ echo '9' >> d $ hg ci -m "9" -d "9 0" merge $ hg merge -r 6 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg ci -m "merge 6,9" -d "10 0" create branch $ hg up -r 8 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '11' > e $ hg add e $ hg ci -m "11" -d "11 0" created new head $ echo '12' >> e $ hg ci -m "12" -d "12 0" $ echo '13' >> e $ hg ci -m "13" -d "13 0" create branch $ hg up -r 11 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '14' > f $ hg add f $ hg ci -m "14" -d "14 0" created new head merge $ hg up -r 13 -C 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg merge -r 10 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg ci -m "merge 10,13" -d "15 0" $ echo '16' >> e $ hg ci -m "16" -d "16 0" $ echo '17' >> e $ hg ci -m "17" -d "17 0" create branch $ hg up -r 15 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '18' >> e $ hg ci -m "18" -d "18 0" created new head log $ hg log changeset: 18:d42e18c7bc9b tag: tip parent: 15:857b178a7cf3 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:18 1970 +0000 summary: 18 changeset: 17:228c06deef46 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000 summary: 17 changeset: 16:609d82a7ebae user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000 summary: 16 changeset: 15:857b178a7cf3 parent: 13:b0a32c86eb31 parent: 10:429fcd26f52d user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000 summary: merge 10,13 changeset: 14:faa450606157 parent: 11:82ca6f06eccd user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:14 1970 +0000 summary: 14 changeset: 13:b0a32c86eb31 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000 summary: 13 changeset: 12:9f259202bbe7 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:12 1970 +0000 summary: 12 changeset: 11:82ca6f06eccd parent: 8:dab8161ac8fc user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000 summary: 11 changeset: 10:429fcd26f52d parent: 9:3c77083deb4a parent: 6:a214d5d3811a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000 summary: merge 6,9 changeset: 9:3c77083deb4a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000 summary: 9 changeset: 8:dab8161ac8fc parent: 1:4ca5088da217 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:08 1970 +0000 summary: 8 changeset: 7:50c76098bbf2 parent: 4:5c668c22234f user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:07 1970 +0000 summary: 7 changeset: 6:a214d5d3811a parent: 5:385a529b6670 parent: 4:5c668c22234f user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:06 1970 +0000 summary: merge 4,5 changeset: 5:385a529b6670 parent: 2:051e12f87bf1 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:05 1970 +0000 summary: 5 changeset: 4:5c668c22234f user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000 summary: 4 changeset: 3:0950834f0a9c user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:03 1970 +0000 summary: 3 changeset: 2:051e12f87bf1 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:02 1970 +0000 summary: 2 changeset: 1:4ca5088da217 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000 summary: 1 changeset: 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: 0 hg up -C $ hg up -C 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved updated to "d42e18c7bc9b: 18" 3 other heads for branch "default" complex bisect test 1 # first bad rev is 9 $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -g 0 $ hg bisect -b 17 # -> update to rev 6 Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (15 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' $ hg bisect -g # -> update to rev 13 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 10 Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 8 Testing changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -g # -> update to rev 9 Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (2 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b The first bad revision is: changeset: 9:3c77083deb4a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000 summary: 9 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)' 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b complex bisect test 2 # first good rev is 13 $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -g 18 $ hg bisect -b 1 # -> update to rev 6 Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 10 Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 6:a214d5d3811a 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 12 Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 13 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -g The first good revision is: changeset: 13:b0a32c86eb31 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000 summary: 13 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 18:d42e18c7bc9b complex bisect test 3 first bad rev is 15 10,9,13 are skipped an might be the first bad revisions as well $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -g 1 $ hg bisect -b 16 # -> update to rev 6 Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg bisect -g # -> update to rev 13 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 10 Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 12 Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 10:429fcd26f52d 13:b0a32c86eb31 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg bisect -g # -> update to rev 9 Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 15 Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' $ hg bisect -b Due to skipped revisions, the first bad revision could be any of: changeset: 9:3c77083deb4a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000 summary: 9 changeset: 10:429fcd26f52d parent: 9:3c77083deb4a parent: 6:a214d5d3811a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000 summary: merge 6,9 changeset: 13:b0a32c86eb31 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000 summary: 13 changeset: 15:857b178a7cf3 parent: 13:b0a32c86eb31 parent: 10:429fcd26f52d user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000 summary: merge 10,13 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' complex bisect test 4 first good revision is 17 15,16 are skipped an might be the first good revisions as well $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -g 17 $ hg bisect -b 8 # -> update to rev 10 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 13 Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 15 Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 17:228c06deef46 $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 16 Testing changeset 16:609d82a7ebae (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 17:228c06deef46 $ hg bisect -s Due to skipped revisions, the first good revision could be any of: changeset: 15:857b178a7cf3 parent: 13:b0a32c86eb31 parent: 10:429fcd26f52d user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000 summary: merge 10,13 changeset: 16:609d82a7ebae user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000 summary: 16 changeset: 17:228c06deef46 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000 summary: 17 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 test unrelated revs: $ hg bisect --reset $ hg bisect -b 7 $ hg bisect -g 14 abort: starting revisions are not directly related [255] $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 7:50c76098bbf2 14:faa450606157 $ hg bisect --reset end at merge: 17 bad, 11 good (but 9 is first bad) $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -b 17 $ hg bisect -g 11 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d $ hg bisect -g Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b The first bad revision is: changeset: 15:857b178a7cf3 parent: 13:b0a32c86eb31 parent: 10:429fcd26f52d user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000 summary: merge 10,13 Not all ancestors of this changeset have been checked. Use bisect --extend to continue the bisection from the common ancestor, dab8161ac8fc. $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d $ hg bisect --extend Extending search to changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d $ hg bisect -g # dab8161ac8fc Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)' 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg bisect -b The first bad revision is: changeset: 9:3c77083deb4a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000 summary: 9 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)' 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b user adds irrelevant but consistent information (here: -g 2) to bisect state $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -b 13 $ hg bisect -g 8 Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 $ hg bisect -g 2 Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 $ hg bisect -b The first bad revision is: changeset: 11:82ca6f06eccd parent: 8:dab8161ac8fc user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000 summary: 11 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 14:faa450606157 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'