tests/test-merge9.t
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
Fri, 13 Apr 2018 10:23:05 -0700
changeset 37629 fa0382088993
parent 35704 41ef02ba329b
child 45827 8d72e29ad1e0
permissions -rw-r--r--
repository: define new interface for running commands Today, the peer interface exposes methods for each command that can be executed. In addition, there is an iterbatch() API that allows commands to be issued in batches and provides an iterator over the results. This is a glorified wrapper around the "batch" wire command. Wire protocol version 2 supports nicer things (such as batching any command and out-of-order replies). It will require a more flexible API for executing commands. This commit introduces a new peer interface for making command requests. In the new world, you can't simply call a method on the peer to execute a command: you need to obtain an object to be used for executing commands. That object can be used to issue a single command or it can batch multiple requests. In the case of full duplex peers, the command may even be sent out over the wire immediately. There are no per-command methods. Instead, there is a generic method to call a command. The implementation can then perform domain specific processing for specific commands. This includes passing data via a specially named argument. Arguments are also passed as a dictionary instead of using **kwargs. While **kwargs is nicer to use, we've historically gotten into trouble using it because there will inevitably be a conflict between the name of an argument to a wire protocol command and an argument we want to pass into a function. Instead of a command returning a value, it returns a future which will resolve to a value. This opens the door for out-of-order response handling and concurrent response handling in the version 2 protocol. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3267

test that we don't interrupt the merge session if
a file-level merge failed

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ echo a > bar
  $ hg ci -Am 'add foo'
  adding bar
  adding foo

  $ hg mv foo baz
  $ echo b >> bar
  $ echo quux > quux1
  $ hg ci -Am 'mv foo baz'
  adding quux1

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo >> foo
  $ echo c >> bar
  $ echo quux > quux2
  $ hg ci -Am 'change foo'
  adding quux2
  created new head

test with the rename on the remote side
  $ HGMERGE=false hg merge
  merging bar
  merging foo and baz to baz
  merging bar failed!
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  [1]
  $ hg resolve -l
  U bar
  R baz

test with the rename on the local side
  $ hg up -C 1
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ HGMERGE=false hg merge
  merging bar
  merging baz and foo to baz
  merging bar failed!
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  [1]

show unresolved
  $ hg resolve -l
  U bar
  R baz

unmark baz
  $ hg resolve -u baz

show
  $ hg resolve -l
  U bar
  U baz
  $ hg st
  M bar
  M baz
  M quux2
  ? bar.orig

re-resolve baz
  $ hg resolve baz
  merging baz and foo to baz

after resolve
  $ hg resolve -l
  U bar
  R baz

resolve all warning
  $ hg resolve
  abort: no files or directories specified
  (use --all to re-merge all unresolved files)
  [255]

resolve all
  $ hg resolve -a
  merging bar
  warning: conflicts while merging bar! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
  [1]

after
  $ hg resolve -l
  U bar
  R baz

  $ cd ..