tests/test-double-merge.t

templatekw: choose {latesttag} by len(changes), not date (issue5659)

As Augie reported in the bug, the current heuristic of choosing the
best tag of a merge commit by taking the one with newest tag (in terms
of tagging date) currently fails in the Mercurial repo itself. Copying
the example from Yuya:

  $ hg glog -T '{node|short} {latesttag}+{latesttagdistance}\n' \
    -r '4.2.3: & (merge() + parents(merge()) + tag())'
  o    02a745c20121 4.2.3+5
  |\
  | o    86aca74a063b 4.2.3+4
  | |\
  | | o  e6d8ee3c9ec3 4.3-rc+109
  | | |
  | | ~
  o |  a3ce07e2dde5 4.3.1+2
  : |
  o |  3fee7f7d2da0 4.3.1+0
  |/
  o    98e990bb7330 4.2.3+3
  |\
  | ~
  o  506d7e48fbe6 4.2.3+2
  :
  o  943c91326b23 4.2.3+0
  |
  ~

It seems to me like the best choice is the tag with the smallest
number of changes since it (across all paths, not the longest single
path). So that's what this patch does, even though it's
costly. Best-of-5 timings for Yuya's command above shows a slowdown
from 1.293s to 1.610s. We can optimize it later.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D447

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ echo line 1 > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

copy foo to bar and change both files
  $ hg cp foo bar
  $ echo line 2-1 >> foo
  $ echo line 2-2 >> bar
  $ hg ci -m 'cp foo bar; change both'

in another branch, change foo in a way that doesn't conflict with
the other changes
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo line 0 > foo
  $ hg cat foo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

we get conflicts that shouldn't be there
  $ hg merge -P
  changeset:   1:484bf6903104
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     cp foo bar; change both
  
  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in other:
     bar
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'foo' -> dst: 'bar' *
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: e6dc8efe11cc, local: 6a0df1dad128+, remote: 484bf6903104
   preserving foo for resolve of bar
   preserving foo for resolve of foo
  starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
   bar: remote copied from foo -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for bar (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging foo and bar to bar
  my bar@6a0df1dad128+ other bar@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
   foo: versions differ -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for foo (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging foo
  my foo@6a0df1dad128+ other foo@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

contents of foo
  $ cat foo
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-1

contents of bar
  $ cat bar
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-2

  $ cd ..