tests/test-manifest-merging.t
author Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com>
Tue, 15 Aug 2017 23:23:55 -0700
branchstable
changeset 33862 fb672eac2702
parent 16913 f2719b387380
permissions -rw-r--r--
templatekw: choose {latesttag} by len(changes), not date (issue5659) As Augie reported in the bug, the current heuristic of choosing the best tag of a merge commit by taking the one with newest tag (in terms of tagging date) currently fails in the Mercurial repo itself. Copying the example from Yuya: $ hg glog -T '{node|short} {latesttag}+{latesttagdistance}\n' \ -r '4.2.3: & (merge() + parents(merge()) + tag())' o 02a745c20121 4.2.3+5 |\ | o 86aca74a063b 4.2.3+4 | |\ | | o e6d8ee3c9ec3 4.3-rc+109 | | | | | ~ o | a3ce07e2dde5 4.3.1+2 : | o | 3fee7f7d2da0 4.3.1+0 |/ o 98e990bb7330 4.2.3+3 |\ | ~ o 506d7e48fbe6 4.2.3+2 : o 943c91326b23 4.2.3+0 | ~ It seems to me like the best choice is the tag with the smallest number of changes since it (across all paths, not the longest single path). So that's what this patch does, even though it's costly. Best-of-5 timings for Yuya's command above shows a slowdown from 1.293s to 1.610s. We can optimize it later. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D447

  $ hg init base

  $ cd base
  $ echo 'alpha' > alpha
  $ hg ci -A -m 'add alpha'
  adding alpha
  $ cd ..

  $ hg clone base work
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cd work
  $ echo 'beta' > beta
  $ hg ci -A -m 'add beta'
  adding beta
  $ cd ..

  $ cd base
  $ echo 'gamma' > gamma
  $ hg ci -A -m 'add gamma'
  adding gamma
  $ cd ..

  $ cd work
  $ hg pull -q
  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

Update --clean to revision 1 to simulate a failed merge:

  $ rm alpha beta gamma
  $ hg update --clean 1
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ cd ..