view tests/test-branch-tag-confict.t @ 37048:fc5e261915b9

wireproto: require POST for all HTTPv2 requests Wire protocol version 1 transfers argument data via request headers by default. This has historically caused problems because servers institute limits on the length of individual HTTP headers as well as the total size of all request headers. Mercurial servers can advertise the maximum length of an individual header. But there's no guarantee any intermediate HTTP agents will accept headers up to that length. In the existing wire protocol, server operators typically also key off the HTTP request method to implement authentication. For example, GET requests translate to read-only requests and can be allowed. But read-write commands must use POST and require authentication. This has typically worked because the only wire protocol commands that use POST modify the repo (e.g. the "unbundle" command). There is an experimental feature to enable clients to transmit argument data via POST request bodies. This is technically a better and more robust solution. But we can't enable it by default because of servers assuming POST means write access. In version 2 of the wire protocol, the permissions of a request are encoded in the URL. And with it being a new protocol in a new URL space, we're not constrained by backwards compatibility requirements. This commit adopts the technically superior mechanism of using HTTP request bodies to send argument data by requiring POST for all commands. Strictly speaking, it may be possible to send request bodies on GET requests. But my experience is that not all HTTP stacks support this. POST pretty much always works. Using POST for read-only operations does sacrifice some RESTful design purity. But this API cares about practicality, not about being in Roy T. Fielding's REST ivory tower. There's a chance we may relax this restriction in the future. But for now, I want to see how far we can get with a POST only API. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2837
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Tue, 13 Mar 2018 11:57:43 -0700
parents f2719b387380
children
line wrap: on
line source

Initial setup.

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ touch thefile
  $ hg ci -A -m 'Initial commit.'
  adding thefile

Create a tag.

  $ hg tag branchortag

Create a branch with the same name as the tag.

  $ hg branch branchortag
  marked working directory as branch branchortag
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
  $ hg ci -m 'Create a branch with the same name as a tag.'

This is what we have:

  $ hg log
  changeset:   2:10519b3f489a
  branch:      branchortag
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Create a branch with the same name as a tag.
  
  changeset:   1:2635c45ca99b
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added tag branchortag for changeset f57387372b5d
  
  changeset:   0:f57387372b5d
  tag:         branchortag
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Initial commit.
  
Update to the tag:

  $ hg up 'tag(branchortag)'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents
  changeset:   0:f57387372b5d
  tag:         branchortag
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Initial commit.
  
Updating to the branch:

  $ hg up 'branch(branchortag)'
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents
  changeset:   2:10519b3f489a
  branch:      branchortag
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Create a branch with the same name as a tag.
  

  $ cd ..