Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-bisect2.t @ 40326:fed697fa1734
sqlitestore: file storage backend using SQLite
This commit provides an extension which uses SQLite to store file
data (as opposed to revlogs).
As the inline documentation describes, there are still several
aspects to the extension that are incomplete. But it's a start.
The extension does support basic clone, checkout, and commit
workflows, which makes it suitable for simple use cases.
One notable missing feature is support for "bundlerepos." This is
probably responsible for the most test failures when the extension
is activated as part of the test suite.
All revision data is stored in SQLite. Data is stored as zstd
compressed chunks (default if zstd is available), zlib compressed
chunks (default if zstd is not available), or raw chunks (if
configured or if a compressed delta is not smaller than the raw
delta). This makes things very similar to revlogs.
Unlike revlogs, the extension doesn't yet enforce a limit on delta
chain length. This is an obvious limitation and should be addressed.
This is somewhat mitigated by the use of zstd, which is much faster
than zlib to decompress.
There is a dedicated table for storing deltas. Deltas are stored
by the SHA-1 hash of their uncompressed content. The "fileindex" table
has columns that reference the delta for each revision and the base
delta that delta should be applied against. A recursive SQL query
is used to resolve the delta chain along with the delta data.
By storing deltas by hash, we are able to de-duplicate delta storage!
With revlogs, the same deltas in different revlogs would result in
duplicate storage of that delta. In this scheme, inserting the
duplicate delta is a no-op and delta chains simply reference the
existing delta.
When initially implementing this extension, I did not have
content-indexed deltas and deltas could be duplicated across files
(just like revlogs). When I implemented content-indexed deltas, the
size of the SQLite database for a full clone of mozilla-unified
dropped:
before: 2,554,261,504 bytes
after: 2,488,754,176 bytes
Surprisingly, this is still larger than the bytes size of revlog
files:
revlog files: 2,104,861,230 bytes
du -b: 2,254,381,614
I would have expected storage to be smaller since we're not limiting
delta chain length and since we're using zstd instead of zlib. I
suspect the SQLite indexes and per-column overhead account for the
bulk of the differences. (Keep in mind that revlog uses a 64-byte
packed struct for revision index data and deltas are stored without
padding. Aside from the 12 unused bytes in the 32 byte node field,
revlogs are pretty efficient.) Another source of overhead is file
name storage. With revlogs, file names are stored in the filesystem.
But with SQLite, we need to store file names in the database. This is
roughly equivalent to the size of the fncache file, which for the
mozilla-unified repository is ~34MB.
Since the SQLite database isn't append-only and since delta chains
can reference any delta, this opens some interesting possibilities.
For example, we could store deltas in reverse, such that fulltexts
are stored for newer revisions and deltas are applied to reconstruct
older revisions. This is likely a more optimal storage strategy for
version control, as new data tends to be more frequently accessed
than old data. We would obviously need wire protocol support for
transferring revision data from newest to oldest. And we would
probably need some kind of mechanism for "re-encoding" stores. But
it should be doable.
This extension is very much experimental quality. There are a handful
of features that don't work. It probably isn't suitable for day-to-day
use. But it could be used in limited cases (e.g. read-only checkouts
like in CI). And it is also a good proving ground for alternate
storage backends. As we continue to define interfaces for all things
storage, it will be useful to have a viable alternate storage backend
to see how things shake out in practice.
test-storage.py passes on Python 2 and introduces no new test failures on
Python 3. Having the storage-level unit tests has proved to be insanely
useful when developing this extension. Those tests caught numerous bugs
during development and I'm convinced this style of testing is the way
forward for ensuring alternate storage backends work as intended. Of
course, test coverage isn't close to what it needs to be. But it is
a start. And what coverage we have gives me confidence that basic store
functionality is implemented properly.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4928
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 09 Oct 2018 08:50:13 -0700 |
parents | 1b5c61d38a52 |
children | f51ff655d338 |
line wrap: on
line source
# The tests in test-bisect are done on a linear history. Here the # following repository history is used for testing: # # 17 # | # 18 16 # \ / # 15 # / \ # / \ # 10 13 # / \ | # / \ | 14 # 7 6 9 12 / # \ / \ | |/ # 4 \ | 11 # \ \ | / # 3 5 | / # \ / |/ # 2 8 # \ / # 1 # | # 0 init $ hg init committing changes $ echo > a $ echo '0' >> a $ hg add a $ hg ci -m "0" -d "0 0" $ echo '1' >> a $ hg ci -m "1" -d "1 0" $ echo '2' >> a $ hg ci -m "2" -d "2 0" $ echo '3' >> a $ hg ci -m "3" -d "3 0" $ echo '4' >> a $ hg ci -m "4" -d "4 0" create branch $ hg up -r 2 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '5' >> b $ hg add b $ hg ci -m "5" -d "5 0" created new head merge $ hg merge 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg ci -m "merge 4,5" -d "6 0" create branch $ hg up -r 4 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '7' > c $ hg add c $ hg ci -m "7" -d "7 0" created new head create branch $ hg up -r 1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '8' > d $ hg add d $ hg ci -m "8" -d "8 0" created new head $ echo '9' >> d $ hg ci -m "9" -d "9 0" merge $ hg merge -r 6 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg ci -m "merge 6,9" -d "10 0" create branch $ hg up -r 8 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '11' > e $ hg add e $ hg ci -m "11" -d "11 0" created new head $ echo '12' >> e $ hg ci -m "12" -d "12 0" $ echo '13' >> e $ hg ci -m "13" -d "13 0" create branch $ hg up -r 11 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '14' > f $ hg add f $ hg ci -m "14" -d "14 0" created new head merge $ hg up -r 13 -C 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg merge -r 10 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg ci -m "merge 10,13" -d "15 0" $ echo '16' >> e $ hg ci -m "16" -d "16 0" $ echo '17' >> e $ hg ci -m "17" -d "17 0" create branch $ hg up -r 15 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo '18' >> e $ hg ci -m "18" -d "18 0" created new head log $ hg log changeset: 18:d42e18c7bc9b tag: tip parent: 15:857b178a7cf3 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:18 1970 +0000 summary: 18 changeset: 17:228c06deef46 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000 summary: 17 changeset: 16:609d82a7ebae user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000 summary: 16 changeset: 15:857b178a7cf3 parent: 13:b0a32c86eb31 parent: 10:429fcd26f52d user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000 summary: merge 10,13 changeset: 14:faa450606157 parent: 11:82ca6f06eccd user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:14 1970 +0000 summary: 14 changeset: 13:b0a32c86eb31 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000 summary: 13 changeset: 12:9f259202bbe7 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:12 1970 +0000 summary: 12 changeset: 11:82ca6f06eccd parent: 8:dab8161ac8fc user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000 summary: 11 changeset: 10:429fcd26f52d parent: 9:3c77083deb4a parent: 6:a214d5d3811a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000 summary: merge 6,9 changeset: 9:3c77083deb4a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000 summary: 9 changeset: 8:dab8161ac8fc parent: 1:4ca5088da217 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:08 1970 +0000 summary: 8 changeset: 7:50c76098bbf2 parent: 4:5c668c22234f user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:07 1970 +0000 summary: 7 changeset: 6:a214d5d3811a parent: 5:385a529b6670 parent: 4:5c668c22234f user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:06 1970 +0000 summary: merge 4,5 changeset: 5:385a529b6670 parent: 2:051e12f87bf1 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:05 1970 +0000 summary: 5 changeset: 4:5c668c22234f user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000 summary: 4 changeset: 3:0950834f0a9c user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:03 1970 +0000 summary: 3 changeset: 2:051e12f87bf1 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:02 1970 +0000 summary: 2 changeset: 1:4ca5088da217 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000 summary: 1 changeset: 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: 0 hg up -C $ hg up -C 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved updated to "d42e18c7bc9b: 18" 3 other heads for branch "default" complex bisect test 1 # first bad rev is 9 $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -g 0 $ hg bisect -b 17 # -> update to rev 6 Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (15 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' $ hg bisect -g # -> update to rev 13 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 10 Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 8 Testing changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -g # -> update to rev 9 Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (2 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b The first bad revision is: changeset: 9:3c77083deb4a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000 summary: 9 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)' 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b complex bisect test 2 # first good rev is 13 $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -g 18 $ hg bisect -b 1 # -> update to rev 6 Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 10 Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 6:a214d5d3811a 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 12 Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 13 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -g The first good revision is: changeset: 13:b0a32c86eb31 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000 summary: 13 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 18:d42e18c7bc9b complex bisect test 3 first bad rev is 15 10,9,13 are skipped an might be the first bad revisions as well $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -g 1 $ hg bisect -b 16 # -> update to rev 6 Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg bisect -g # -> update to rev 13 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 10 Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 12 Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 10:429fcd26f52d 13:b0a32c86eb31 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg bisect -g # -> update to rev 9 Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 15 Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' $ hg bisect -b Due to skipped revisions, the first bad revision could be any of: changeset: 9:3c77083deb4a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000 summary: 9 changeset: 10:429fcd26f52d parent: 9:3c77083deb4a parent: 6:a214d5d3811a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000 summary: merge 6,9 changeset: 13:b0a32c86eb31 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000 summary: 13 changeset: 15:857b178a7cf3 parent: 13:b0a32c86eb31 parent: 10:429fcd26f52d user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000 summary: merge 10,13 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' complex bisect test 4 first good revision is 17 15,16 are skipped an might be the first good revisions as well $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -g 17 $ hg bisect -b 8 # -> update to rev 10 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 13 Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b # -> update to rev 15 Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 17:228c06deef46 $ hg bisect -s # -> update to rev 16 Testing changeset 16:609d82a7ebae (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 17:228c06deef46 $ hg bisect -s Due to skipped revisions, the first good revision could be any of: changeset: 15:857b178a7cf3 parent: 13:b0a32c86eb31 parent: 10:429fcd26f52d user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000 summary: merge 10,13 changeset: 16:609d82a7ebae user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000 summary: 16 changeset: 17:228c06deef46 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000 summary: 17 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 test unrelated revs: $ hg bisect --reset $ hg bisect -b 7 $ hg bisect -g 14 abort: starting revisions are not directly related [255] $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 7:50c76098bbf2 14:faa450606157 $ hg bisect --reset end at merge: 17 bad, 11 good (but 9 is first bad) $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -b 17 $ hg bisect -g 11 Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d $ hg bisect -g Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg bisect -b The first bad revision is: changeset: 15:857b178a7cf3 parent: 13:b0a32c86eb31 parent: 10:429fcd26f52d user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000 summary: merge 10,13 Not all ancestors of this changeset have been checked. Use bisect --extend to continue the bisection from the common ancestor, dab8161ac8fc. $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d $ hg bisect --extend Extending search to changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d $ hg bisect -g # dab8161ac8fc Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)' 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg bisect -b The first bad revision is: changeset: 9:3c77083deb4a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000 summary: 9 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 8:dab8161ac8fc 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)' 2:051e12f87bf1 3:0950834f0a9c 4:5c668c22234f 5:385a529b6670 6:a214d5d3811a $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)' 9:3c77083deb4a 10:429fcd26f52d 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b user adds irrelevant but consistent information (here: -g 2) to bisect state $ hg bisect -r $ hg bisect -b 13 $ hg bisect -g 8 Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 $ hg bisect -g 2 Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests) 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)' 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 $ hg bisect -b The first bad revision is: changeset: 11:82ca6f06eccd parent: 8:dab8161ac8fc user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000 summary: 11 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)' 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)' 0:33b1f9bc8bc5 1:4ca5088da217 2:051e12f87bf1 8:dab8161ac8fc 11:82ca6f06eccd 12:9f259202bbe7 13:b0a32c86eb31 14:faa450606157 15:857b178a7cf3 16:609d82a7ebae 17:228c06deef46 18:d42e18c7bc9b $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'