Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-copy.t @ 40326:fed697fa1734
sqlitestore: file storage backend using SQLite
This commit provides an extension which uses SQLite to store file
data (as opposed to revlogs).
As the inline documentation describes, there are still several
aspects to the extension that are incomplete. But it's a start.
The extension does support basic clone, checkout, and commit
workflows, which makes it suitable for simple use cases.
One notable missing feature is support for "bundlerepos." This is
probably responsible for the most test failures when the extension
is activated as part of the test suite.
All revision data is stored in SQLite. Data is stored as zstd
compressed chunks (default if zstd is available), zlib compressed
chunks (default if zstd is not available), or raw chunks (if
configured or if a compressed delta is not smaller than the raw
delta). This makes things very similar to revlogs.
Unlike revlogs, the extension doesn't yet enforce a limit on delta
chain length. This is an obvious limitation and should be addressed.
This is somewhat mitigated by the use of zstd, which is much faster
than zlib to decompress.
There is a dedicated table for storing deltas. Deltas are stored
by the SHA-1 hash of their uncompressed content. The "fileindex" table
has columns that reference the delta for each revision and the base
delta that delta should be applied against. A recursive SQL query
is used to resolve the delta chain along with the delta data.
By storing deltas by hash, we are able to de-duplicate delta storage!
With revlogs, the same deltas in different revlogs would result in
duplicate storage of that delta. In this scheme, inserting the
duplicate delta is a no-op and delta chains simply reference the
existing delta.
When initially implementing this extension, I did not have
content-indexed deltas and deltas could be duplicated across files
(just like revlogs). When I implemented content-indexed deltas, the
size of the SQLite database for a full clone of mozilla-unified
dropped:
before: 2,554,261,504 bytes
after: 2,488,754,176 bytes
Surprisingly, this is still larger than the bytes size of revlog
files:
revlog files: 2,104,861,230 bytes
du -b: 2,254,381,614
I would have expected storage to be smaller since we're not limiting
delta chain length and since we're using zstd instead of zlib. I
suspect the SQLite indexes and per-column overhead account for the
bulk of the differences. (Keep in mind that revlog uses a 64-byte
packed struct for revision index data and deltas are stored without
padding. Aside from the 12 unused bytes in the 32 byte node field,
revlogs are pretty efficient.) Another source of overhead is file
name storage. With revlogs, file names are stored in the filesystem.
But with SQLite, we need to store file names in the database. This is
roughly equivalent to the size of the fncache file, which for the
mozilla-unified repository is ~34MB.
Since the SQLite database isn't append-only and since delta chains
can reference any delta, this opens some interesting possibilities.
For example, we could store deltas in reverse, such that fulltexts
are stored for newer revisions and deltas are applied to reconstruct
older revisions. This is likely a more optimal storage strategy for
version control, as new data tends to be more frequently accessed
than old data. We would obviously need wire protocol support for
transferring revision data from newest to oldest. And we would
probably need some kind of mechanism for "re-encoding" stores. But
it should be doable.
This extension is very much experimental quality. There are a handful
of features that don't work. It probably isn't suitable for day-to-day
use. But it could be used in limited cases (e.g. read-only checkouts
like in CI). And it is also a good proving ground for alternate
storage backends. As we continue to define interfaces for all things
storage, it will be useful to have a viable alternate storage backend
to see how things shake out in practice.
test-storage.py passes on Python 2 and introduces no new test failures on
Python 3. Having the storage-level unit tests has proved to be insanely
useful when developing this extension. Those tests caught numerous bugs
during development and I'm convinced this style of testing is the way
forward for ensuring alternate storage backends work as intended. Of
course, test coverage isn't close to what it needs to be. But it is
a start. And what coverage we have gives me confidence that basic store
functionality is implemented properly.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4928
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 09 Oct 2018 08:50:13 -0700 |
parents | f1186c292d03 |
children | e41449818bee |
line wrap: on
line source
$ mkdir part1 $ cd part1 $ hg init $ echo a > a $ hg add a $ hg commit -m "1" $ hg status $ hg copy a b $ hg --config ui.portablefilenames=abort copy a con.xml abort: filename contains 'con', which is reserved on Windows: con.xml [255] $ hg status A b $ hg sum parent: 0:c19d34741b0a tip 1 branch: default commit: 1 copied update: (current) phases: 1 draft $ hg --debug commit -m "2" committing files: b b: copy a:b789fdd96dc2f3bd229c1dd8eedf0fc60e2b68e3 committing manifest committing changelog updating the branch cache committed changeset 1:93580a2c28a50a56f63526fb305067e6fbf739c4 we should see two history entries $ hg history -v changeset: 1:93580a2c28a5 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: b description: 2 changeset: 0:c19d34741b0a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: a description: 1 we should see one log entry for a $ hg log a changeset: 0:c19d34741b0a user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: 1 this should show a revision linked to changeset 0 $ hg debugindex a rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2 0 0 b789fdd96dc2 000000000000 000000000000 we should see one log entry for b $ hg log b changeset: 1:93580a2c28a5 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: 2 this should show a revision linked to changeset 1 $ hg debugindex b rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2 0 1 37d9b5d994ea 000000000000 000000000000 this should show the rename information in the metadata $ hg debugdata b 0 | head -3 | tail -2 copy: a copyrev: b789fdd96dc2f3bd229c1dd8eedf0fc60e2b68e3 #if reporevlogstore $ md5sum.py .hg/store/data/b.i 44913824c8f5890ae218f9829535922e .hg/store/data/b.i #endif $ hg cat b > bsum $ md5sum.py bsum 60b725f10c9c85c70d97880dfe8191b3 bsum $ hg cat a > asum $ md5sum.py asum 60b725f10c9c85c70d97880dfe8191b3 asum $ hg verify checking changesets checking manifests crosschecking files in changesets and manifests checking files checked 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files $ cd .. $ mkdir part2 $ cd part2 $ hg init $ echo foo > foo should fail - foo is not managed $ hg mv foo bar foo: not copying - file is not managed abort: no files to copy [255] $ hg st -A ? foo $ hg add foo dry-run; print a warning that this is not a real copy; foo is added $ hg mv --dry-run foo bar foo has not been committed yet, so no copy data will be stored for bar. $ hg st -A A foo should print a warning that this is not a real copy; bar is added $ hg mv foo bar foo has not been committed yet, so no copy data will be stored for bar. $ hg st -A A bar should print a warning that this is not a real copy; foo is added $ hg cp bar foo bar has not been committed yet, so no copy data will be stored for foo. $ hg rm -f bar $ rm bar $ hg st -A A foo $ hg commit -m1 moving a missing file $ rm foo $ hg mv foo foo3 foo: deleted in working directory foo3 does not exist! $ hg up -qC . copy --after to a nonexistent target filename $ hg cp -A foo dummy foo: not recording copy - dummy does not exist [1] dry-run; should show that foo is clean $ hg copy --dry-run foo bar $ hg st -A C foo should show copy $ hg copy foo bar $ hg st -C A bar foo shouldn't show copy $ hg commit -m2 $ hg st -C should match $ hg debugindex foo rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2 0 0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 $ hg debugrename bar bar renamed from foo:2ed2a3912a0b24502043eae84ee4b279c18b90dd $ echo bleah > foo $ echo quux > bar $ hg commit -m3 should not be renamed $ hg debugrename bar bar not renamed $ hg copy -f foo bar should show copy $ hg st -C M bar foo XXX: filtering lfilesrepo.status() in 3.3-rc causes the copy source to not be displayed. $ hg st -C --config extensions.largefiles= The fsmonitor extension is incompatible with the largefiles extension and has been disabled. (fsmonitor !) M bar foo $ hg commit -m3 should show no parents for tip $ hg debugindex bar rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2 0 1 7711d36246cc 000000000000 000000000000 1 2 bdf70a2b8d03 7711d36246cc 000000000000 2 3 b2558327ea8d 000000000000 000000000000 should match $ hg debugindex foo rev linkrev nodeid p1 p2 0 0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 1 2 dd12c926cf16 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 $ hg debugrename bar bar renamed from foo:dd12c926cf165e3eb4cf87b084955cb617221c17 should show no copies $ hg st -C copy --after on an added file $ cp bar baz $ hg add baz $ hg cp -A bar baz $ hg st -C A baz bar foo was clean: $ hg st -AC foo C foo Trying to copy on top of an existing file fails, $ hg copy -A bar foo foo: not overwriting - file already committed ('hg copy --after --force' to replace the file by recording a copy) [1] same error without the --after, so the user doesn't have to go through two hints: $ hg copy bar foo foo: not overwriting - file already committed ('hg copy --force' to replace the file by recording a copy) [1] but it's considered modified after a copy --after --force $ hg copy -Af bar foo $ hg st -AC foo M foo bar The hint for a file that exists but is not in file history doesn't mention --force: $ touch xyzzy $ hg cp bar xyzzy xyzzy: not overwriting - file exists ('hg copy --after' to record the copy) [1] $ cd ..