view tests/test-infinitepush.t @ 40326:fed697fa1734

sqlitestore: file storage backend using SQLite

This commit provides an extension which uses SQLite to store file
data (as opposed to revlogs).

As the inline documentation describes, there are still several
aspects to the extension that are incomplete. But it's a start.
The extension does support basic clone, checkout, and commit
workflows, which makes it suitable for simple use cases.

One notable missing feature is support for "bundlerepos." This is
probably responsible for the most test failures when the extension
is activated as part of the test suite.

All revision data is stored in SQLite. Data is stored as zstd
compressed chunks (default if zstd is available), zlib compressed
chunks (default if zstd is not available), or raw chunks (if
configured or if a compressed delta is not smaller than the raw
delta). This makes things very similar to revlogs.

Unlike revlogs, the extension doesn't yet enforce a limit on delta
chain length. This is an obvious limitation and should be addressed.
This is somewhat mitigated by the use of zstd, which is much faster
than zlib to decompress.

There is a dedicated table for storing deltas. Deltas are stored
by the SHA-1 hash of their uncompressed content. The "fileindex" table
has columns that reference the delta for each revision and the base
delta that delta should be applied against. A recursive SQL query
is used to resolve the delta chain along with the delta data.

By storing deltas by hash, we are able to de-duplicate delta storage!
With revlogs, the same deltas in different revlogs would result in
duplicate storage of that delta. In this scheme, inserting the
duplicate delta is a no-op and delta chains simply reference the
existing delta.

When initially implementing this extension, I did not have
content-indexed deltas and deltas could be duplicated across files
(just like revlogs). When I implemented content-indexed deltas, the
size of the SQLite database for a full clone of mozilla-unified
dropped:

before: 2,554,261,504 bytes
after:  2,488,754,176 bytes

Surprisingly, this is still larger than the bytes size of revlog
files:

revlog files: 2,104,861,230 bytes
du -b:        2,254,381,614

I would have expected storage to be smaller since we're not limiting
delta chain length and since we're using zstd instead of zlib. I
suspect the SQLite indexes and per-column overhead account for the
bulk of the differences. (Keep in mind that revlog uses a 64-byte
packed struct for revision index data and deltas are stored without
padding. Aside from the 12 unused bytes in the 32 byte node field,
revlogs are pretty efficient.) Another source of overhead is file
name storage. With revlogs, file names are stored in the filesystem.
But with SQLite, we need to store file names in the database. This is
roughly equivalent to the size of the fncache file, which for the
mozilla-unified repository is ~34MB.

Since the SQLite database isn't append-only and since delta chains
can reference any delta, this opens some interesting possibilities.
For example, we could store deltas in reverse, such that fulltexts
are stored for newer revisions and deltas are applied to reconstruct
older revisions. This is likely a more optimal storage strategy for
version control, as new data tends to be more frequently accessed
than old data. We would obviously need wire protocol support for
transferring revision data from newest to oldest. And we would
probably need some kind of mechanism for "re-encoding" stores. But
it should be doable.

This extension is very much experimental quality. There are a handful
of features that don't work. It probably isn't suitable for day-to-day
use. But it could be used in limited cases (e.g. read-only checkouts
like in CI). And it is also a good proving ground for alternate
storage backends. As we continue to define interfaces for all things
storage, it will be useful to have a viable alternate storage backend
to see how things shake out in practice.

test-storage.py passes on Python 2 and introduces no new test failures on
Python 3. Having the storage-level unit tests has proved to be insanely
useful when developing this extension. Those tests caught numerous bugs
during development and I'm convinced this style of testing is the way
forward for ensuring alternate storage backends work as intended. Of
course, test coverage isn't close to what it needs to be. But it is
a start. And what coverage we have gives me confidence that basic store
functionality is implemented properly.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4928

#require no-reposimplestore

Testing infinipush extension and the confi options provided by it

Setup

  $ . "$TESTDIR/library-infinitepush.sh"
  $ cp $HGRCPATH $TESTTMP/defaulthgrc
  $ setupcommon
  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ setupserver
  $ echo initialcommit > initialcommit
  $ hg ci -Aqm "initialcommit"
  $ hg phase --public .

  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone ssh://user@dummy/repo client -q

Create two heads. Push first head alone, then two heads together. Make sure that
multihead push works.
  $ cd client
  $ echo multihead1 > multihead1
  $ hg add multihead1
  $ hg ci -m "multihead1"
  $ hg up null
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo multihead2 > multihead2
  $ hg ci -Am "multihead2"
  adding multihead2
  created new head
  $ hg push -r . --bundle-store
  pushing to ssh://user@dummy/repo
  searching for changes
  remote: pushing 1 commit:
  remote:     ee4802bf6864  multihead2
  $ hg push -r '1:2' --bundle-store
  pushing to ssh://user@dummy/repo
  searching for changes
  remote: pushing 2 commits:
  remote:     bc22f9a30a82  multihead1
  remote:     ee4802bf6864  multihead2
  $ scratchnodes
  bc22f9a30a821118244deacbd732e394ed0b686c ab1bc557aa090a9e4145512c734b6e8a828393a5
  ee4802bf6864326a6b3dcfff5a03abc2a0a69b8f ab1bc557aa090a9e4145512c734b6e8a828393a5

Create two new scratch bookmarks
  $ hg up 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo scratchfirstpart > scratchfirstpart
  $ hg ci -Am "scratchfirstpart"
  adding scratchfirstpart
  created new head
  $ hg push -r . -B scratch/firstpart
  pushing to ssh://user@dummy/repo
  searching for changes
  remote: pushing 1 commit:
  remote:     176993b87e39  scratchfirstpart
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo scratchsecondpart > scratchsecondpart
  $ hg ci -Am "scratchsecondpart"
  adding scratchsecondpart
  created new head
  $ hg push -r . -B scratch/secondpart
  pushing to ssh://user@dummy/repo
  searching for changes
  remote: pushing 1 commit:
  remote:     8db3891c220e  scratchsecondpart

Pull two bookmarks from the second client
  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone ssh://user@dummy/repo client2 -q
  $ cd client2
  $ hg pull -B scratch/firstpart -B scratch/secondpart
  pulling from ssh://user@dummy/repo
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets * (glob)
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
  $ hg log -r scratch/secondpart -T '{node}'
  8db3891c220e216f6da214e8254bd4371f55efca (no-eol)
  $ hg log -r scratch/firstpart -T '{node}'
  176993b87e39bd88d66a2cccadabe33f0b346339 (no-eol)
Make two commits to the scratch branch

  $ echo testpullbycommithash1 > testpullbycommithash1
  $ hg ci -Am "testpullbycommithash1"
  adding testpullbycommithash1
  created new head
  $ hg log -r '.' -T '{node}\n' > ../testpullbycommithash1
  $ echo testpullbycommithash2 > testpullbycommithash2
  $ hg ci -Aqm "testpullbycommithash2"
  $ hg push -r . -B scratch/mybranch -q

Create third client and pull by commit hash.
Make sure testpullbycommithash2 has not fetched
  $ cd ..
  $ hg clone ssh://user@dummy/repo client3 -q
  $ cd client3
  $ hg pull -r `cat ../testpullbycommithash1`
  pulling from ssh://user@dummy/repo
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets 33910bfe6ffe (1 drafts)
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
  $ hg log -G -T '{desc} {phase} {bookmarks}'
  o  testpullbycommithash1 draft
  |
  @  initialcommit public
  
Make public commit in the repo and pull it.
Make sure phase on the client is public.
  $ cd ../repo
  $ echo publiccommit > publiccommit
  $ hg ci -Aqm "publiccommit"
  $ hg phase --public .
  $ cd ../client3
  $ hg pull
  pulling from ssh://user@dummy/repo
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  new changesets a79b6597f322
  (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
  $ hg log -G -T '{desc} {phase} {bookmarks} {node|short}'
  o  publiccommit public  a79b6597f322
  |
  | o  testpullbycommithash1 draft  33910bfe6ffe
  |/
  @  initialcommit public  67145f466344
  
  $ hg up a79b6597f322
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo scratchontopofpublic > scratchontopofpublic
  $ hg ci -Aqm "scratchontopofpublic"
  $ hg push -r . -B scratch/scratchontopofpublic
  pushing to ssh://user@dummy/repo
  searching for changes
  remote: pushing 1 commit:
  remote:     c70aee6da07d  scratchontopofpublic
  $ cd ../client2
  $ hg pull -B scratch/scratchontopofpublic
  pulling from ssh://user@dummy/repo
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets a79b6597f322:c70aee6da07d (1 drafts)
  (run 'hg heads .' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge)
  $ hg log -r scratch/scratchontopofpublic -T '{phase}'
  draft (no-eol)