Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-issue3084.t @ 40326:fed697fa1734
sqlitestore: file storage backend using SQLite
This commit provides an extension which uses SQLite to store file
data (as opposed to revlogs).
As the inline documentation describes, there are still several
aspects to the extension that are incomplete. But it's a start.
The extension does support basic clone, checkout, and commit
workflows, which makes it suitable for simple use cases.
One notable missing feature is support for "bundlerepos." This is
probably responsible for the most test failures when the extension
is activated as part of the test suite.
All revision data is stored in SQLite. Data is stored as zstd
compressed chunks (default if zstd is available), zlib compressed
chunks (default if zstd is not available), or raw chunks (if
configured or if a compressed delta is not smaller than the raw
delta). This makes things very similar to revlogs.
Unlike revlogs, the extension doesn't yet enforce a limit on delta
chain length. This is an obvious limitation and should be addressed.
This is somewhat mitigated by the use of zstd, which is much faster
than zlib to decompress.
There is a dedicated table for storing deltas. Deltas are stored
by the SHA-1 hash of their uncompressed content. The "fileindex" table
has columns that reference the delta for each revision and the base
delta that delta should be applied against. A recursive SQL query
is used to resolve the delta chain along with the delta data.
By storing deltas by hash, we are able to de-duplicate delta storage!
With revlogs, the same deltas in different revlogs would result in
duplicate storage of that delta. In this scheme, inserting the
duplicate delta is a no-op and delta chains simply reference the
existing delta.
When initially implementing this extension, I did not have
content-indexed deltas and deltas could be duplicated across files
(just like revlogs). When I implemented content-indexed deltas, the
size of the SQLite database for a full clone of mozilla-unified
dropped:
before: 2,554,261,504 bytes
after: 2,488,754,176 bytes
Surprisingly, this is still larger than the bytes size of revlog
files:
revlog files: 2,104,861,230 bytes
du -b: 2,254,381,614
I would have expected storage to be smaller since we're not limiting
delta chain length and since we're using zstd instead of zlib. I
suspect the SQLite indexes and per-column overhead account for the
bulk of the differences. (Keep in mind that revlog uses a 64-byte
packed struct for revision index data and deltas are stored without
padding. Aside from the 12 unused bytes in the 32 byte node field,
revlogs are pretty efficient.) Another source of overhead is file
name storage. With revlogs, file names are stored in the filesystem.
But with SQLite, we need to store file names in the database. This is
roughly equivalent to the size of the fncache file, which for the
mozilla-unified repository is ~34MB.
Since the SQLite database isn't append-only and since delta chains
can reference any delta, this opens some interesting possibilities.
For example, we could store deltas in reverse, such that fulltexts
are stored for newer revisions and deltas are applied to reconstruct
older revisions. This is likely a more optimal storage strategy for
version control, as new data tends to be more frequently accessed
than old data. We would obviously need wire protocol support for
transferring revision data from newest to oldest. And we would
probably need some kind of mechanism for "re-encoding" stores. But
it should be doable.
This extension is very much experimental quality. There are a handful
of features that don't work. It probably isn't suitable for day-to-day
use. But it could be used in limited cases (e.g. read-only checkouts
like in CI). And it is also a good proving ground for alternate
storage backends. As we continue to define interfaces for all things
storage, it will be useful to have a viable alternate storage backend
to see how things shake out in practice.
test-storage.py passes on Python 2 and introduces no new test failures on
Python 3. Having the storage-level unit tests has proved to be insanely
useful when developing this extension. Those tests caught numerous bugs
during development and I'm convinced this style of testing is the way
forward for ensuring alternate storage backends work as intended. Of
course, test coverage isn't close to what it needs to be. But it is
a start. And what coverage we have gives me confidence that basic store
functionality is implemented properly.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4928
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 09 Oct 2018 08:50:13 -0700 |
parents | 9d5c27890790 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
$ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "largefiles =" >> $HGRCPATH Create the repository outside $HOME since largefiles write to $HOME/.cache/largefiles. $ hg init test $ cd test $ echo "root" > root $ hg add root $ hg commit -m "Root commit" --config extensions.largefiles=! Ensure that .hg/largefiles isn't created before largefiles are added #if unix-permissions $ chmod 555 .hg #endif $ hg status #if unix-permissions $ chmod 755 .hg #endif $ test -f .hg/largefiles [1] $ echo "large" > foo $ hg add --large foo $ hg commit -m "Add foo as a largefile" $ hg update -r 0 getting changed largefiles 0 largefiles updated, 1 removed 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo "normal" > foo $ hg add foo $ hg commit -m "Add foo as normal file" created new head Normal file in the working copy, keeping the normal version: $ echo "n" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes remote turned local normal file foo into a largefile use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? n 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status $ cat foo normal Normal file in the working copy, keeping the largefile version: $ hg update -q -C $ echo "l" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes remote turned local normal file foo into a largefile use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? l getting changed largefiles 1 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status M foo $ hg diff --nodates diff -r fa129ab6b5a7 .hglf/foo --- /dev/null +++ b/.hglf/foo @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@ +7f7097b041ccf68cc5561e9600da4655d21c6d18 diff -r fa129ab6b5a7 foo --- a/foo +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1 +0,0 @@ -normal $ cat foo large Largefile in the working copy, keeping the normal version: $ hg update -q -C -r 1 $ echo "n" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes remote turned local largefile foo into a normal file keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? n getting changed largefiles 0 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status M foo $ hg diff --nodates diff -r ff521236428a .hglf/foo --- a/.hglf/foo +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1 +0,0 @@ -7f7097b041ccf68cc5561e9600da4655d21c6d18 diff -r ff521236428a foo --- /dev/null +++ b/foo @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@ +normal $ cat foo normal Largefile in the working copy, keeping the largefile version: $ hg update -q -C -r 1 $ echo "l" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes remote turned local largefile foo into a normal file keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? l 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg status $ cat foo large Whatever ... commit something so we can invoke merge when updating $ hg commit -m '3: Merge' Updating from largefile to normal - no reason to prompt $ hg up -r 2 getting changed largefiles 0 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cat foo normal (the update above used to leave the working dir in a very weird state - clean it $ hg up -qr null $ hg up -qr 2 ) Updating from normal to largefile - no reason to prompt $ hg up -r 3 getting changed largefiles 1 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cat foo large $ cd .. Systematic testing of merges involving largefiles: Ancestor: normal Parent: normal-id Parent: large result: large Ancestor: normal Parent: normal2 Parent: large result: ? Ancestor: large Parent: large-id Parent: normal result: normal Ancestor: large Parent: large2 Parent: normal result: ? All cases should try merging both ways. Prepare test repo: $ hg init merges $ cd merges prepare cases with "normal" ancestor: $ hg up -qr null $ echo normal > f $ hg ci -Aqm "normal-ancestor" $ hg tag -l "normal-ancestor" $ touch f2 $ hg ci -Aqm "normal-id" $ hg tag -l "normal-id" $ echo normal2 > f $ hg ci -m "normal2" $ hg tag -l "normal2" $ echo normal > f $ hg ci -Aqm "normal-same" $ hg tag -l "normal-same" $ hg up -qr "normal-ancestor" $ hg rm f $ echo large > f $ hg add --large f $ hg ci -qm "large" $ hg tag -l "large" prepare cases with "large" ancestor: $ hg up -qr null $ echo large > f $ hg add --large f $ hg ci -qm "large-ancestor" $ hg tag -l "large-ancestor" $ touch f2 $ hg ci -Aqm "large-id" $ hg tag -l "large-id" $ echo large2 > f $ hg ci -m "large2" $ hg tag -l "large2" $ echo large > f $ hg ci -Aqm "large-same" $ hg tag -l "large-same" $ hg up -qr "large-ancestor" $ hg rm f $ echo normal > f $ hg ci -qAm "normal" $ hg tag -l "normal" $ hg log -GT '{tags}' @ normal tip | | o large-same | | | o large2 | | | o large-id |/ o large-ancestor o large | | o normal-same | | | o normal2 | | | o normal-id |/ o normal-ancestor Ancestor: normal Parent: normal-id Parent: large result: large $ hg up -Cqr normal-id $ hg merge -r large getting changed largefiles 1 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f large swap $ hg up -Cqr large $ hg merge -r normal-id 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f large Ancestor: normal Parent: normal-same Parent: large result: large $ hg up -Cqr normal-same $ hg merge -r large getting changed largefiles 1 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f large swap $ hg up -Cqr large $ hg merge -r normal-same 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f large Ancestor: normal Parent: normal2 Parent: large result: ? (annoying extra prompt ... but it do not do any serious harm) $ hg up -Cqr normal2 $ hg merge -r large remote turned local normal file f into a largefile use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? l getting changed largefiles 1 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f large $ hg up -Cqr normal2 $ echo n | hg merge -r large --config ui.interactive=Yes remote turned local normal file f into a largefile use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? n 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f normal2 swap $ hg up -Cqr large $ hg merge -r normal2 remote turned local largefile f into a normal file keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? l 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f large $ hg up -Cqr large $ echo n | hg merge -r normal2 --config ui.interactive=Yes remote turned local largefile f into a normal file keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? n getting changed largefiles 0 largefiles updated, 0 removed 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f normal2 Ancestor: large Parent: large-id Parent: normal result: normal $ hg up -Cqr large-id $ hg merge -r normal getting changed largefiles 0 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f normal swap $ hg up -Cqr normal $ hg merge -r large-id 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f normal Ancestor: large Parent: large-same Parent: normal result: normal $ hg up -Cqr large-same $ hg merge -r normal getting changed largefiles 0 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f normal swap $ hg up -Cqr normal $ hg merge -r large-same 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f normal Ancestor: large Parent: large2 Parent: normal result: ? (annoying extra prompt ... but it do not do any serious harm) $ hg up -Cqr large2 $ hg merge -r normal remote turned local largefile f into a normal file keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? l 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f large2 $ hg up -Cqr large2 $ echo n | hg merge -r normal --config ui.interactive=Yes remote turned local largefile f into a normal file keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? n getting changed largefiles 0 largefiles updated, 0 removed 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f normal swap $ hg up -Cqr normal $ hg merge -r large2 remote turned local normal file f into a largefile use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? l getting changed largefiles 1 largefiles updated, 0 removed 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f large2 $ hg up -Cqr normal $ echo n | hg merge -r large2 --config ui.interactive=Yes remote turned local normal file f into a largefile use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? n 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ cat f normal $ cd ..