exchangev2: fetch and apply phases data
Now that the server supports emitting phases data, we can request it
and apply it on the client.
Because we may receive phases-only updates from the server, we no
longer conditionally perform the "changesetdata" command depending
on whether there are revisions to fetch. In the previous wire
protocol, this case would result in us falling back to performing
"listkeys" commands to look up phases, bookmarks, etc data. But
since "changesetdata" is smart enough to handle metadata only
fetches, we can keep things consistent.
It's worth noting that because of the unified approach to changeset
data retrieval, phase handling code in wire proto v2 exchange is
drastically simpler. Contrast with all the code in exchange.py
dealing with all the variations for obtaining phases data.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4484
Create a repo and add some commits
$ hg init mm
$ cd mm
$ echo "Test content" > testfile1
$ hg add testfile1
$ hg commit -m "First commit" -u "Proper <commit@m.c>"
$ echo "Test content 2" > testfile2
$ hg add testfile2
$ hg commit -m "Second commit" -u "Commit Name 2 <commit2@m.c>"
$ echo "Test content 3" > testfile3
$ hg add testfile3
$ hg commit -m "Third commit" -u "Commit Name 3 <commit3@m.c>"
$ echo "Test content 4" > testfile4
$ hg add testfile4
$ hg commit -m "Fourth commit" -u "Commit Name 4 <commit4@m.c>"
Add a .mailmap file with each possible entry type plus comments
$ cat > .mailmap << EOF
> # Comment shouldn't break anything
> <proper@m.c> <commit@m.c> # Should update email only
> Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c> # Should update name only
> Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c> <commit3@m.c> # Should update name, email due to email
> Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c> Commit Name 4 <commit4@m.c> # Should update name, email due to name, email
> EOF
$ hg add .mailmap
$ hg commit -m "Add mailmap file" -u "Testuser <test123@m.c>"
Output of commits should be normal without filter
$ hg log -T "{author}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <commit@m.c>
Commit Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Commit Name 3 <commit3@m.c>
Commit Name 4 <commit4@m.c>
Testuser <test123@m.c>
Output of commits with filter shows their mailmap values
$ hg log -T "{mailmap(author)}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c>
Testuser <test123@m.c>
Add new mailmap entry for testuser
$ cat >> .mailmap << EOF
> <newmmentry@m.c> <test123@m.c>
> EOF
Output of commits with filter shows their updated mailmap values
$ hg log -T "{mailmap(author)}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c>
Testuser <newmmentry@m.c>
A commit with improperly formatted user field should not break the filter
$ echo "some more test content" > testfile1
$ hg commit -m "Commit with improper user field" -u "Improper user"
$ hg log -T "{mailmap(author)}\n" -r "all()"
Proper <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 2 <commit2@m.c>
Proper Name 3 <proper@m.c>
Proper Name 4 <proper@m.c>
Testuser <newmmentry@m.c>
Improper user
No TypeError beacause of invalid input
$ hg log -T '{mailmap(termwidth)}\n' -r0
80