Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-minirst.py @ 36755:ff4bc0ab6740 stable
wireproto: check permissions when executing "batch" command (BC) (SEC)
For as long as the "batch" command has existed (introduced by
bd88561afb4b and first released as part of Mercurial 1.9), that command
(like most wire commands introduced after 2008) lacked an entry in
the hgweb permissions table. And since we don't verify permissions if
an entry is missing from the permissions table, this meant that
executing a command via "batch" would bypass all permissions
checks.
The security implications are significant: a Mercurial HTTP server
would allow writes via "batch" wire protocol commands as long as
the HTTP request were processed by Mercurial and the process running
the Mercurial HTTP server had write access to the repository. The
Mercurial defaults of servers being read-only and the various web.*
config options to define access control were bypassed.
In addition, "batch" could be used to exfiltrate data from servers
that were configured to not allow read access.
Both forms of permissions bypass could be mitigated to some extent
by using HTTP authentication. This would prevent HTTP requests from
hitting Mercurial's server logic. However, any authenticated request
would still be able to bypass permissions checks via "batch" commands.
The easiest exploit was to send "pushkey" commands via "batch" and
modify the state of bookmarks, phases, and obsolescence markers.
However, I suspect a well-crafted HTTP request could trick the server
into running the "unbundle" wire protocol command, effectively
performing a full `hg push` to create new changesets on the remote.
This commit plugs this gaping security hole by having the "batch"
command perform permissions checking on each sub-command that is
being batched. We do this by threading a permissions checking
callable all the way to the protocol handler. The threading is a
bit hacky from a code perspective. But it preserves API compatibility,
which is the proper thing to do on the stable branch.
One of the subtle things we do is assume that a command with an
undefined permission is a "push" command. This is the safest thing to
do from a security perspective: we don't want to take chances that
a command could perform a write even though the server is configured
to not allow writes.
As the test changes demonstrate, it is no longer possible to bypass
permissions via the "batch" wire protocol command.
.. bc::
The "batch" wire protocol command now enforces permissions of
each invoked sub-command. Wire protocol commands must define
their operation type or the "batch" command will assume they
can write data and will prevent their execution on HTTP servers
unless the HTTP request method is POST, the server is configured
to allow pushes, and the (possibly authenticated) HTTP user is
authorized to perform a push.
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:55:58 -0800 |
parents | 6582b3716ae0 |
children | 87b8fc4533ca |
line wrap: on
line source
from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function import pprint from mercurial import ( minirst, ) def debugformat(text, form, **kwargs): if form == 'html': print("html format:") out = minirst.format(text, style=form, **kwargs) else: print("%d column format:" % form) out = minirst.format(text, width=form, **kwargs) print("-" * 70) if type(out) == tuple: print(out[0][:-1]) print("-" * 70) pprint.pprint(out[1]) else: print(out[:-1]) print("-" * 70) print() def debugformats(title, text, **kwargs): print("== %s ==" % title) debugformat(text, 60, **kwargs) debugformat(text, 30, **kwargs) debugformat(text, 'html', **kwargs) paragraphs = """ This is some text in the first paragraph. A small indented paragraph. It is followed by some lines containing random whitespace. \n \n \nThe third and final paragraph. """ debugformats('paragraphs', paragraphs) definitions = """ A Term Definition. The indented lines make up the definition. Another Term Another definition. The final line in the definition determines the indentation, so this will be indented with four spaces. A Nested/Indented Term Definition. """ debugformats('definitions', definitions) literals = r""" The fully minimized form is the most convenient form:: Hello literal world In the partially minimized form a paragraph simply ends with space-double-colon. :: //////////////////////////////////////// long un-wrapped line in a literal block \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ :: This literal block is started with '::', the so-called expanded form. The paragraph with '::' disappears in the final output. """ debugformats('literals', literals) lists = """ - This is the first list item. Second paragraph in the first list item. - List items need not be separated by a blank line. - And will be rendered without one in any case. We can have indented lists: - This is an indented list item - Another indented list item:: - A literal block in the middle of an indented list. (The above is not a list item since we are in the literal block.) :: Literal block with no indentation (apart from the two spaces added to all literal blocks). 1. This is an enumerated list (first item). 2. Continuing with the second item. (1) foo (2) bar 1) Another 2) List Line blocks are also a form of list: | This is the first line. The line continues here. | This is the second line. Bullet lists are also detected: * This is the first bullet * This is the second bullet It has 2 lines * This is the third bullet """ debugformats('lists', lists) options = """ There is support for simple option lists, but only with long options: -X, --exclude filter an option with a short and long option with an argument -I, --include an option with both a short option and a long option --all Output all. --both Output both (this description is quite long). --long Output all day long. --par This option has two paragraphs in its description. This is the first. This is the second. Blank lines may be omitted between options (as above) or left in (as here). The next paragraph looks like an option list, but lacks the two-space marker after the option. It is treated as a normal paragraph: --foo bar baz """ debugformats('options', options) fields = """ :a: First item. :ab: Second item. Indentation and wrapping is handled automatically. Next list: :small: The larger key below triggers full indentation here. :much too large: This key is big enough to get its own line. """ debugformats('fields', fields) containers = """ Normal output. .. container:: debug Initial debug output. .. container:: verbose Verbose output. .. container:: debug Debug output. """ debugformats('containers (normal)', containers) debugformats('containers (verbose)', containers, keep=['verbose']) debugformats('containers (debug)', containers, keep=['debug']) debugformats('containers (verbose debug)', containers, keep=['verbose', 'debug']) roles = """Please see :hg:`add`.""" debugformats('roles', roles) sections = """ Title ===== Section ------- Subsection '''''''''' Markup: ``foo`` and :hg:`help` ------------------------------ """ debugformats('sections', sections) admonitions = """ .. note:: This is a note - Bullet 1 - Bullet 2 .. warning:: This is a warning Second input line of warning .. danger:: This is danger """ debugformats('admonitions', admonitions) comments = """ Some text. .. A comment .. An indented comment Some indented text. .. Empty comment above """ debugformats('comments', comments) data = [['a', 'b', 'c'], ['1', '2', '3'], ['foo', 'bar', 'baz this list is very very very long man']] rst = minirst.maketable(data, 2, True) table = ''.join(rst) print(table) debugformats('table', table) data = [['s', 'long', 'line\ngoes on here'], ['', 'xy', 'tried to fix here\n by indenting']] rst = minirst.maketable(data, 1, False) table = ''.join(rst) print(table) debugformats('table+nl', table)