Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:01:07 +0000] rev 40925
perf: add perfprogress command
I've noticed that progress bars can add significant overhead to tight
loops. Let's add a perf command that attempts to isolate that overhead.
With a default hgrc, iteration over 1M items appears to take ~3.75s on
my machine. Profiling reveals ~28% of time is spent in ui.configbool()
resolving the value of the progress.debug config option.
Even if I set progress.disable=true, execution still takes ~2.60s, with
~59% of the time spent in ui.configbool().
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5407
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:55:08 +0000] rev 40924
wireprotov2: unify file revision collection and linknode derivation
The old mechanism for choosing which file revisions to send in the
haveparents=True case was buggy in multiple ways - the most severe
of which being that file revisions were excluded when they shouldn't
have been.
This commit unifies the logic for deriving the filenodes that will
be sent by the "filesdata" command. We now consistently read files
data from manifests. The "haveparents" argument now controls whether
we iterate ctx.files() or use the full manifest to derive relevant
files.
The logic here is still woefully lacking to fully support shallow
clones. It will require an API break to fully address. This commit
should at least make the server APIs emit proper data, which is
strictly better than before.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5406
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2018 18:04:12 +0000] rev 40923
wireprotov2: send linknodes to emitfilerevisions()
Previously, linknodes were calculated within emitfilerevisions() by
using filectx.introrev(), which would always use the linkrev/linknode
as recorded by storage. This is wrong for cases where the receiver
doesn't have the changeset the linknode refers to.
This commit changes the logic for linknode emission so the mapping
of filenode to linknode is computed by the caller and passed into
emitfilerevisions().
As part of the change, linknodes for "filesdata" in the
haveparents=False case are now correct: the existing code performed a
manifest walk and it was trivial to plug in the correct linknode.
However, behavior for the haveparents=True case is still wrong
because it relies on filtering linkrevs against the outgoing set in
order to determine what to send. This will be fixed in a subsequent
commit.
The change test test-wireproto-exchangev2-shallow.t is a bit wonky.
The test repo has 6 revisions. The changed test is performing a shallow
clone with depth=1. So, only file data for revision 5 is present
locally. So, the new behavior of associating the linknode with
revision 5 for every file revision seems correct. Of course, when
backfilling old revisions, we'll want to update the linknode. But
this problem requires wire protocol support and we'll cross that
bridge later.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5405
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2018 17:26:12 +0000] rev 40922
tests: add tests for server-side linknode adjustment with wireprotov2
The current implementation of linknode serving in wireprotov2 simply
serves up the linkrev/linknode as stored: it doesn't attempt to
adjust the linknode to what the receiver is aware of. This can result
in the client seeing a linknode referencing a changeset that is unknown
to it.
This commit adds test coverage of that scenario.
The tests in test-wireproto-command-filesdata.t demonstrate two failures.
First, the linknode refers to a changeset not in the available set.
Second, the server doesn't send a file revision that it should have
(because of linkrev filtering).
The test in test-wireproto-exchange.t demonstrates that the lack of
a file revision results in a corrupted repository on the client.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5404
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:53:09 +0000] rev 40921
tests: fix empty commit in test
This was almost certainly a bug.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5403
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 10 Dec 2018 19:41:43 +0000] rev 40920
tests: add sparserevlog requirement to test-sqlitestore.t
Looks like this test was missed when enabling sparse revlogs by default.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5402
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 12 Nov 2018 02:21:52 +0100] rev 40919
tests: remove all transitional configuration
Now that sparse-revlog is enabled by default, we no longer needs it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5346
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:22:38 +0100] rev 40918
sparse-revlog: enabled by default
The feature provides large benefits. It now seems mature enough to be enabled
by default.
* It solves catastrophic issues regarding delta storage in revlog,
* It allows for shorter delta chain in all repositories, improving
performances.
Running benchmark of a wide range of operation did not reveal problematic
impact. Performance gains are observed where expected.
The format is supported by Mercurial version 4.7. So it seems safe to enable
it by default now.
Here is a reminder of key numbers regarding this delta strategy effect on
repository size and performance.
Effect on Size:
===============
For repositories with a lot of branches, sparse-revlog significantly improve
size, fixing limitation associated with the span of a delta chain. In
addition, sparse-revlog, deal well with limitations of the delta chain length.
For large repositories, this allows for a stiff reduction of the delta chain
without a problematic impact on the repository size. This delta chain length
improvement helps all repositories, not just the ones with many branches.
As a reminder, here are the default chain limits for each "format":
* no-sparse: none
* sparse: 1000
Mercurial
---------
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|-------------|------------
no-sparse | 6 143 044 | 6 269 496
sparse | 5 798 796 | 5 827 025
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000
value || average | max || average | max
------------||---------|---------||---------|---------
no-sparse || 429 | 1 397 || 397 | 1 000
sparse || 326 | 1 290 || 313 | 1 000
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|-------------|------------
no-sparse | 46 944 775 | 47 166 129
sparse | 46 622 445 | 46 723 774
pypy
----
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|-------------|------------
no-sparse | 52 941 760 | 56 200 970
sparse | 26 348 229 | 27 384 133
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000
value || average | max || average | max
------------||---------|---------||---------|---------
no-sparse || 769 | 3 889 || 390 | 1 000
sparse || 1 223 | 3 846 || 495 | 1 000
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|-------------|------------
no-sparse | 336 050 203 | 339 309 413
sparse | 338 673 985 | 339 709 889
Mozilla
-------
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 215 096 339 | 1 708 853 525
sparse | 188 947 271 | 278 894 170
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000
value || average | max || average | max
------------||---------|---------||---------|--------
no-sparse || 20 454 | 59 562 || 491 | 1 000
sparse || 23 509 | 69 891 || 489 | 1 000
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 2 377 578 715 | 3 876 258 798
sparse | 2 441 677 137 | 2 535 997 381
Netbeans
--------
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 130 088 982 | 741 590 565
sparse | 118 836 887 | 159 161 207
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000
value || average | max || average | max
------------||---------|---------||---------|---------
no-sparse || 19 321 | 61 397 || 510 | 1 000
sparse || 21 240 | 61 583 || 503 | 1 000
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 1 160 013 008 | 1 771 514 591
sparse | 1 164 959 988 | 1 205 284 308
Private repo #1
---------------
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|-----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 33 725 285 081 | 33 724 834 190
sparse | 350 542 420 | 423 470 579
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000
value || average | max || average | max
------------||---------|---------||---------|---------
no-sparse || 282 | 8 885 || 113 | 1 000
snapshot || 3 655 | 8 951 || 530 | 1 000
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 41 544 149 652 | 41 543 698 761
sparse | 8 448 037 300 | 8 520 965 459
Effect on speed:
================
Performances are strongly impacted by the delta chain length. Longer chain
results in slower revision restoration. For this reason, the 1000 chain limit
introduced by sparse-revlog helps repository with previously large chains a
lot. In our corpus, this means `netbeans` and `mozilla-central` who suffered
from unreasonable manifest delta chain length.
Another way sparse revlog helps, is by producing better delta's. For
repositories with many branches, the pathological patterns that resulted in
many sub-optimal deltas are gone. Smaller delta help with operations where
deltas are directly relevant, like bundle.
However, the sparse-revlog logic introduces some extra processing and a more
throughout testing of possible delta candidates. Adding an extra cost in some
cases. This cost is usually counterbalanced by the other performance gain.
However, for smaller repositories not affected by delta chain length issues or
branching related issues, this might make things a bit slower. However, these
are also repository where revlog performance is dwarfed by other costs.
Below are the summary of some timing from the performance test suite running
at `http://perf.octobus.net/` for a handful of key commands and operation.
It is important to keep in mind that most of this command works on the tip
part of the repository. The non-sparse and sparse version produce different
delta chains and the tip revision can end up at an arbitrary point of these
chains. This will impact some performance number listed in this summary.
For the record: here is the delta chain length for the tip revision of
manifest log in the benchmarked repository:
| no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 94 | 904 |
pypy | 23 | 673 |
netbeans | 4158 | 258 |
mozilla | 63263 | 781 |
As you can see, the chain length for mercurial and pypy turn out to be
significantly longer. The netbeans and mozilla one get shorter because these
repositories benefit from the maximum chain length.
Timing for `hg commit`:
-----------------------
The time taken by `hg commit` does not varies significantly, no drawback for
using sparse here.
| no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 68.1ms | 66.7ms |
pypy | 95.0ms | 94.1ms |
netbeans | 614.0ms | 611.0ms |
mozilla | 1340.0ms | 1.320.0ms |
Check the final section for statistics on a wider array of write.
Timing for bundling 10 000 changesets
-------------------------------------
The repository that benefits from better delta see a good performance boost.
The other ones are not significantly affected.
| no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 3.1s | 3.0s |
pypy | 25.1s | 7.5s |
netbeans | 24.2s | 17.0s |
mozilla | 23.7s | 25.0s |
Timing for unbundling 1 000 changesets
--------------------------------------
Mercurial and mozilla are unaffected. The pypy repository benefit well from
the better delta.
However, the netbeans repository takes a visible hit. Digging that difference
reveals that it comes from the sparse-revlog bundle having to deal with a
snapshot that was re-encoded in the bundle. The slow path for adding new a revision
had to be triggered for it, slowing things down. The Sparse versions do not have
such snapshot to handle similar cases in the tested configuration.
| no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 519ms | 502ms |
pypy | 1.270ms | 886ms |
netbeans | 1.370ms | 2.250ms |
mozilla | 3.230ms | 3.210ms |
Netbeans benefits from the better deltas in other dimensions too. For
example, the produced bundle is significantly smaller:
* netbeans-no-sparse.hg: 2.3MB
* netbeans-sparse.hg: 1.9MB
Timing to restore the tip most manifest entry:
----------------------------------------------
Nothing surprising here. The timing for mercurial and pypy are within a small
range where they won't affect performance much. In our tested case, they are
slower as they use a longer chain.
Timing for netbeans and mozilla improves a lot. Removing a significant amount
of time.
| no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 1.09ms | 3.15ms |
pypy | 4.11ms | 10.70ms |
netbeans | 239.00ms | 112.00ms |
mozilla | 688.00ms | 198.00ms |
Reading 100 revision in descending order:
-----------------------------------------
We see the same kind of effect when reading the last 100 revisions. Large
boost for netbeans and mozilla, as they use much smaller delta chain.
Mercurial and pypy longer chain means slower reads, but nothing gets out of
control.
| no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 0.089s | 0.268s |
pypy | 0.259s | 0.698s |
netbeans | 125.000s | 20.600s |
mozilla | 23.000s | 11.400s |
Writing from full text: statistic for the last 30K revisions
------------------------------------------------------------
This benchmark adds revisions to revlog from their full text. This is similar
to the work done during a commit, but for a large amount of revisions so that
we get a more relevant view.
We see better overall performances with sparse-revlog. The very worst case is
usually slower with sparse-revlog, but does not gets out of control. For the
vast majorities of the other writes, sparse-revlog is significantly faster for
larger repositories. This is reflected in the accumulated rewrite time for
netbeans and mozilla.
The notable exception is the pypy repository where things get slower. The
extra processing is not balanced by shorter delta chain. However, this is to
be seen as a blocking issue. First, the overall time spend dealing with revlog
for the repository pypy size is small compared to the other costs, so we get
slower on operations that matter less than for other larger repository.
Second, we still get nice size benefit from using sparse-revlog, smaller repo
size brings other usability and speed benefit (eg: bundle size).
max time | no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 0.010143s | 0.045280s |
pypy | 0.034924s | 0.243288s |
netbeans | 0.605371s | 2.130876s |
mozilla | 1.478342s | 3.424541s |
99% time | no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 0.003774s | 0.003758s |
pypy | 0.017387s | 0.025310s |
netbeans | 0.576913s | 0.271195s |
mozilla | 1.478342s | 0.449661s |
95% time | no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 0.002069s | 0.002120s |
pypy | 0.010141s | 0.014797s |
netbeans | 0.540202s | 0.258644s |
mozilla | 0.654830s | 0.243440s |
full time | no-sparse | sparse |
mercurial | 14.15s | 14.87s |
pypy | 90.50s | 137.12s |
netbeans | 6401.06s | 3411.14s |
mozilla | 3086.89s | 1991.97s |
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5345
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:22:30 +0100] rev 40917
test: preemptively disable sparse-revlog for some of test-upgrade-repo
Some part of this test assumes sparse-revlog is off. We enforce it explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5344
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:19:48 +0100] rev 40916
test: enable sparse-revlog for test-wireproto-content-redirects.t
We are about to enable sparse-revlog globally. To help with reviewing the tests
change, we isolate them in individual changesets.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5343
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:18:58 +0100] rev 40915
test: enable sparse-revlog for test-wireproto-command-capabilities.t
We are about to enable sparse-revlog globally. To help with reviewing the
tests change, we isolate them in individual changesets.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5342
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:18:45 +0100] rev 40914
test: enable sparse-revlog for test-wireproto-caching.t
We are about to enable sparse-revlog globally. To help with reviewing the
tests change, we isolate them in individual changesets.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5341