discovery: prefer loop to double-for list comprehension in changegroupsubset The double-for form of list comprehensions gets particularly unreadable when you throw in an 'if' condition. This expands the only remaining instance of the double-for syntax in our codebase into a loop.

merge with stable

merge with stable

Added signature for changeset ca387377df7a

Added tag 2.8.2 for changeset ca387377df7a

merge with i18n

i18n-ja: synchronized with d4be314b2071

merge with stable