Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:38:09 +0530 mergestate: rename a helpless variable name to bit helpful one
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:38:09 +0530] rev 45165
mergestate: rename a helpless variable name to bit helpful one The old variable name `r` makes it ~impossible to understand what does it mean. One can only understand that after going to callers and hoping that its documented there. I also documented return value of the function involved while I was there. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8738
Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:20:54 +0530 mergestate: remove unnecessary recordactions() from mergestate class
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Jul 2020 18:20:54 +0530] rev 45164
mergestate: remove unnecessary recordactions() from mergestate class This function is updating dirstate which sounds like not something which a method on mergestate class should do. Also this just calls another function. Lets directly call that function and remove this reducing mergestate responsibility a bit. There was single caller which is updated. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8737
Thu, 09 Jul 2020 17:05:41 +0530 mergestate: document mergestate records in an organized way
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Jul 2020 17:05:41 +0530] rev 45163
mergestate: document mergestate records in an organized way This makes clear which mergestate record is used for what and group them based on how they are used right now. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8719
Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:39:42 +0530 mergestate: remove unused unsupported related mergestate records
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:39:42 +0530] rev 45162
mergestate: remove unused unsupported related mergestate records I tried to find users of this but was unable to find. Seems like RECORD_OVERRIDE is doing for what they were used before. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8718
Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:38:24 +0530 mergestate: add comments about couple of record types and minor reorder
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Jul 2020 16:38:24 +0530] rev 45161
mergestate: add comments about couple of record types and minor reorder I am trying to divide the records into certain groups and then have dedicated objects for them. Taking baby steps in that direction. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8717
Thu, 09 Jul 2020 15:50:02 +0530 mergestate: remove unrequired RECORD_RESOLVED_OTHER record
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Jul 2020 15:50:02 +0530] rev 45160
mergestate: remove unrequired RECORD_RESOLVED_OTHER record This was introduced in last cycle however while working on refactoring mergestate, I realized it's unncessary. This will break users who did a merge using previous version, did this kind of storage and before commiting updated the mercurial version. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8716
Thu, 09 Jul 2020 14:44:58 +0530 mergestate: rename addpath() -> addpathonflict() to prevent confusion
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 09 Jul 2020 14:44:58 +0530] rev 45159
mergestate: rename addpath() -> addpathonflict() to prevent confusion addpath() seems to imply that we are adding a new path/entry to the mergestate. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8715
Sat, 18 Jul 2020 12:35:55 +0200 windows: don’t set `softspace` attribute in `winstdout`
Manuel Jacob <me@manueljacob.de> [Sat, 18 Jul 2020 12:35:55 +0200] rev 45158
windows: don’t set `softspace` attribute in `winstdout` Python 2 file objects have the `softspace` attribute (https://docs.python.org/2/library/stdtypes.html#file.softspace), which is used by the print statement to track its internal state. The documentation demands from file-like objects only that the attribute is writable and initialized to 0. Method `file.write()` sets it to 0, but this is not documented. Historically, sys.stdout was replaced by an instance of the `winstdout` class, so it needed to behave exactly the same (the softspace fix was introduced in 705278e70457). Nowadays we don’t replace sys.stdout and don’t use the print statement on `winstdout` instances, so we can safely drop it.
Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:58:22 +0200 windows: handle file-like objects without isatty() method
Manuel Jacob <me@manueljacob.de> [Fri, 17 Jul 2020 14:58:22 +0200] rev 45157
windows: handle file-like objects without isatty() method Copying the function is not nice, but moving around stuff to avoid the circular import didn’t seem to be worth the effort.
Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:21:31 +0200 exchange: check actually missing revs for obsolete / unstable revs (issue6372)
Manuel Jacob <me@manueljacob.de> [Fri, 17 Jul 2020 08:21:31 +0200] rev 45156
exchange: check actually missing revs for obsolete / unstable revs (issue6372) The previous code was using `outgoing.ancestorsof`, which was originally called `outgoing.missingheads` although not containing the missing heads. This confusion was probably the reason why the buggy code was written. The actually outgoing changesets are stored in `outgoing.missing`. By checking all outgoing changesets, we avoid the problem and can show the list of all obsolete or unstable changesets, which is more helpful for the user.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip