Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 12 Dec 2014 23:18:36 -0800] rev 23653
merge: don't overwrite untracked file at directory rename target
When a directory was renamed and a new untracked file was added in the
new directory and the remote directory added a file by the same name
in the old directory, the local untracked file gets overwritten, as
demonstrated by the broken test case in test-rename-dir-merge.
Fix by checking for unknown files for 'dg' actions too. Since
_checkunknownfile() currently expects the same filename in both
contexts, we need to add a new parameter for the remote filename to
it.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 18 Nov 2014 20:29:25 -0800] rev 23652
merge: remove constant tuple element from 'aborts'
The second element of the tuples in the 'aborts' list is always 'ud',
so let's remove it.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:51:31 -0800] rev 23651
merge: collect checking for unknown files at end of manifestmerge()
The 'c' and 'dc' actions include creating a file on disk and we need
to check that no conflicting file exists unless force=True. Move two
of the calls to _checkunknownfile() to a single place at the end of
manifestmerge(). This removes some of the reading of filelogs from the
heart of manifestmerge() and collects it in one place close to where
its output (entries in the 'aborts' list) is used.
Note that this removes the unnecessary call to _checkunknownfile()
when force=True in one of the code paths.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:48:30 -0800] rev 23650
merge: introduce 'c' action like 'g', but with additional safety
_checkunknownfile() reads the filelog of the remote side's file. For
narrow clones, the filelog will not exist for all files and we need a
way to avoid reading them. While it would be easier for the narrow
extension to just override _checkunknownfile() and make it ignore
files outside the narrow clone, it seems cleaner to have
manifestmerge() not care about filelogs (considering its
name).
In order to move the calls to _checkunknownfile() out, we need to be
able to tell in which cases we should check for unknown files. Let's
start by introducing a new action distinct from 'g' for this
purpose. Specifically, the new action will be just like 'g' except
that it will check that for conflicting unknown files first. For now,
just add the new action type and convert it to 'g'.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 19 Nov 2014 11:44:00 -0800] rev 23649
merge: structure 'remote created' code to match table
This does duplicate the call to _checkunknownfile(), but it will
simplify future patches.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:48:39 -0800] rev 23648
pushkey: run hook after the lock release
The pushkey operation used to be in its own wireprotocol command and (in
practice) always be lock free when running the hook. With bundle2, it happen in
a greater scheme and a hook running locking command would get stuck. We now run
such hooks after the lock release as similar hook do.
Bundle2 test are altered to ensure we are lockfree at hook running time.
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:31:28 -0800] rev 23647
setup: use changes since latest tag instead of just distance
For a Mercurial built on the merge from stable into default right after 3.2.2
was released --
19ebd2f88fc7 -- the version number produced was "3.2.2+4". This
is potentially misleading, since in reality the built Mercurial includes many
more changes compared to 3.2.2.
Change the versioning scheme so that we take into consideration all the changes
present in the current revision that aren't present in the latest tag. For
19ebd2f88fc7 the new versioning scheme results in a version number of
"3.2.2+256". This gives users a much better idea of how many changes have
actually happened since the latest release.
Since changessincelatesttag is always greater than or equal to the
latesttagdistance, this will produce version numbers that are always greater
than or equal to the old scheme. Thus there's minimal compatibility risk.
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:29:39 -0800] rev 23646
setup: use changessincelatesttag from archive if present
changessincelatesttag gives one a better idea of how much the code has changed
since. Since changessincelatesttag is always greater than or equal to the
latesttagdistance (see previous patch for why), this will always produce
version numbers greater than or equal to the previous scheme.
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:27:13 -0800] rev 23645
archive: store number of changes since latest tag as well
This is different from latesttagdistance in that while latesttagdistance is
defined to be the length of the longest path to the latest tag,
changessincelatesttag is the number of changes contained in @ that aren't
contained in the latest tag. So, if 't' is the latest tag in the repository
below:
t
|
v
--o--o----o
\ \
..o..o..@
then latesttagdistance is 2, but changessincelatesttag is 4.
Note that changessincelatesttag is always greater than or equal to the
latesttagdistance -- that's because changessincelatesttag counts all the
changes in the longest path since the latest tag, and possibly others. This is
an important fact that we'll take advantage of in upcoming patches.
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Mon, 22 Dec 2014 17:26:21 -0600] rev 23644
merge with stable