Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:57:04 -0500 Added signature for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71 stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:57:04 -0500] rev 20874
Added signature for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:56:55 -0500 Added tag 2.9.2 for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71 stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 17:56:55 -0500] rev 20873
Added tag 2.9.2 for changeset 3f83fc5cfe71
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:52:16 +0900 backout: correct commit status of no changes made (BC) (issue4190) stable 2.9.2
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:52:16 +0900] rev 20872
backout: correct commit status of no changes made (BC) (issue4190) If backout generated no changes to commit, it showed wrong status, "changeset <target> backs out changeset <target>", and raised TypeError with -v option. This changes the return code to 1, which is the same as "hg commit" and "hg rebase".
Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:41:56 +0900 backout: document return code of merge conflict stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:41:56 +0900] rev 20871
backout: document return code of merge conflict
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:11:19 -0500 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 15:11:19 -0500] rev 20870
merge with stable
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20869
i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems Before this patch, "contrib/check-code.py" can't detect these problems, because the regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" doesn't suppose the case that format string consists of multiple string components concatenated implicitly or explicitly, This patch does below for that regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" problems in such case. - put "+" into separator part ("[ \t\n]") for explicit concatenation ("...." + "...." style) - enclose "component and separator" part by "(?:....)+" for concatenation itself ("...." "...." or "...." + "....")
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20868
i18n: fix "% inside _()" problems Before this patch, "contrib/check-code.py" can't detect these problems, because the regexp pattern to detect "% inside _()" doesn't suppose the case that the format string and "%" aren't placed in the same line. This patch replaces "\s" in that regexp pattern with "[ \t\n]" to detect "% inside _()" problems in such case. "[\s\n]" can't be used in this purpose, because "\s" is automatically replaced with "[ \t]" by "_preparepats()" and "\s" in "[]" causes nested "[]" unexpectedly.
Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900 merge: fix lack of "%s" in format string causing TypeError at runtime stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 01 Apr 2014 02:46:03 +0900] rev 20867
merge: fix lack of "%s" in format string causing TypeError at runtime
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -8 +8 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip