Wed, 05 Nov 2014 09:27:08 +0000 transaction: allow registering a temporary transaction file
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 05 Nov 2014 09:27:08 +0000] rev 23291
transaction: allow registering a temporary transaction file During the transaction, files may be created to store or expose data involved in the transaction (eg: changelog index data are written in a 'changelog.i.a' for hooks). But we do not have an official way to record such file creation and make sure they are cleaned up. The lack of clean-up is currently okay because there is a single file involved and a single producer/consumer. However, as we want to expose more data (bookmarks, phases, obsmarker) we need something more solid. The 'backupentries' mechanism could handle that. Temporary files can be encoded as a backup of nothing '('', <temporarypath>)'. We "need" to attach it to the same mechanism as we use to be able to use temporary transaction files outside of .'store/' and 'backupentries' is expected to gain such feature. This changeset makes it clear that we should rename 'backupentries' to something more generic.
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:22:47 +0000 transaction: always generate file on close
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:22:47 +0000] rev 23290
transaction: always generate file on close The conditionnal was buggy and file were only generated if "onclose" was defined. By luck, "onclose" was always defined.
Sun, 09 Nov 2014 12:31:34 -0500 remove: move most of the implementation into cmdutils.remove()
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 09 Nov 2014 12:31:34 -0500] rev 23289
remove: move most of the implementation into cmdutils.remove() This will allow access to the reusable parts from subrepos, similar to add(), forget(), etc.
Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:08:19 -0800 revlog: increase I/O bound to 4x the amount of data consumed
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Tue, 11 Nov 2014 20:08:19 -0800] rev 23288
revlog: increase I/O bound to 4x the amount of data consumed This doesn't affect normal clones since they'd be bound by the CPU bound below anyway -- it does, however, improve generaldelta clones significantly. This also results in better deltaing for generaldelta clones -- in generaldelta clones, we calculate deltas with respect to the closest base if it has a higher revision number than either parent. If the base is on a significantly different branch, this can result in pointlessly massive deltas. This reduces the number of bases and hence the number of bad deltas. Empirically, for a highly branchy repository, this resulted in an improvement of around 15% to manifest size.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip