Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:13:35 +0900] rev 45472
log: fix -fr'wdir()' PATH to follow newly added file
Testing filelog doesn't make sense in this case because the file existence
is tested against the specified changectxs. If the filelog is empty and
if startctxs != [wctx], 'f not in c' should be triggered.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:08:58 +0900] rev 45471
log: reorganize if-else and for loop in logcmdutil._makematcher()
The test conditions are branchy depending on --follow and --rev options,
so it should be better to switch first by --follow --rev.
Note that revs is not empty so "if follow and startctxs" can be replaced
with "if follow and opts.get(b'rev')".
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 26 Aug 2020 16:37:23 +0530] rev 45470
merge: update commitinfo from all mergeresults during bid merge
During bid merge, it's not clear which commitinfo should be stored and which one
should not. This depends on which side the bid merge chooses for a file. For
this we will need to refactor bid merge code and commitinfo handling.
For now, we just blindly updates info since we hardly have any users of
commitinfo and this will help us in testing and clearing out further path.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8965
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:22:28 +0530] rev 45469
merge: add missing ACTION_KEEP when both remote and ancestor are not present
Previous patch may lead to confusion that the related criss-cross merge is
consistent when done from any of the parents. However this is not true and we
were missing setting an ACTION_KEEP.
This patch now exposes that bid-merge favors ACTION_KEEP always and the result
of merge is different when started from different parents.
This change also effects a test case above where bid merge was wrongly picking
`r` because it was missing keep related information from one of the ancestor.
After this test, we are back in a state in the criss-cross merge tests where the
result depends on which parent we are merging from.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8941
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:20:09 +0530] rev 45468
merge: store ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT when we are keeping the file absent locally
If a file is not present on the local side, and it's unchanged between other
merge parent and ancestor, we don't use any action, neither we had a if-else
branch for that condition. This leads to bid-merge missing that there is a
such action possible which can be performed.
As test changes demonstrate, we now choose the locally deleted side instead
of choosing the remote one consistently. This is also wrong behavior which is
resulted because of missing possible action. It will be fixed in next patch.
This whole logic is not acurrate as we should prompt user on what to do
when this kind of criss-cross merge is in play.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8940
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 01 Sep 2020 17:08:26 +0530] rev 45467
merge: add `ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT` to represent files we want to keep absent
There are files which were deleted/not present in working copy parent but were
present on other side of merge. On merge, we might decide to keep them deleted.
We want to track such cases more closely, rather all kind of cases which results
from some kind of merging logic.
We do have `ACTION_KEEP` but having a dedicated action for the absent case is
more cleaner.
Initially I named the action as `ACTION_KEEP_DELETED` but later realized that
file can be not-present because of other reasons than deletion like rename,
hence decided to use more generic name `ACTION_KEEP_ABSENT`.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8974
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:51:39 +0530] rev 45466
mergeresult: introduce dedicated tuple for no-op actions
This will help us in adding more no-op actions in next patch while keeping the
code cleaner.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 19 Jun 2020 13:27:46 +0200] rev 45465
tests: add criss cross merging tests whose behavior need to be fixed
Merging two changesets can mark a file as removed post merge. However, in some
cases, a user might not want to remove that file and they revert the removal
back and commit the merge. All this works perfectly well.
However, when we do criss-cross merges with such merge where user explicitly
choose to revert the removal with one where another user choose the removal,
we does not get any conflict.
The intent here is conflicting and merge should result in conflicts. One user
merged and want to keep the file while other user merged and want to remove the
file. Merging those merges should result in conflicts.
This patch adds test cases for these cases.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8939
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:52:06 -0700] rev 45464
repo: avoid copying/updating a dict on every `repo.__getitem__`
This has some mild performance benefits. I'm looking into a pathological case
where one of our `hg log` invocations takes several seconds, and according to
hyperfine this reduces the wall time of the entire operation (running in chg)
from:
```
Time (mean ± σ): 7.390 s ± 0.106 s [User: 7.058 s, System: 0.271 s]
Range (min … max): 7.300 s … 7.625 s
```
to:
```
Time (mean ± σ): 7.046 s ± 0.091 s [User: 6.714 s, System: 0.279 s]
Range (min … max): 6.916 s … 7.169 s
```
Note: the log command is slow due to an issue in our custom stuff executing
`repo[<arg>]` 298,800 times. This performance improvement is likely not
noticeable during normal operation, but I don't feel like it's making the code
more difficult to understand, and every small bit helps.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9022
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Thu, 23 Jul 2020 20:23:44 +0200] rev 45463
obsstore: refactor v1 logic to fix 32 byte hash support
Refactor the v1 logic to determine the node parsing based on the flag.
Move the predecessor out of the fixed part and handle it like the other
nodes, removing most of the duplicated code for parsing 20/32 bytes
hashes.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8801
Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:32:24 -0400] rev 45462
fsmonitor: increase the threshold before we recommend it, when using rust
50k files works just fine with the rust status, and it's annoying to
get told "consider using fsmonitor" when we have another solution to
the status speed.
400k files was not chosen in any rigorous way. I know 200k files is
fine. Twice as many files should still be fine.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9021
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:15:06 +0200] rev 45461
copy-tracing: test case where a merge reverted a file deletion
This case is currently broken for commit centric copy tracing. So we add an
official case for it with a note about it being broken.
Fixing it will requires multiples change in code related to merge, commit and
copy tracing, so we introduce it beforehand for simplicity.
Also, I have been sitting on this test for 3 months so I would rather have it
upstream.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 19 Jun 2020 06:04:48 +0200] rev 45460
copy-tracing: test case where we go across a changed/deleted merge
This case is currently broken in the commit centric case. So we add an official
case for it with a note about it being broken.
Fixing it will requires multiples change in code related to merge, commit and
copy tracing, so we introduce it beforehand for simplicity.
Also, I have been sitting on this test for 3 months so I would rather have it
upstream.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:20:53 +0530] rev 45459
merge: show list of bids for each file in bid-merge in ui.debug()
Earlier, we were showing the list of bids only when we were ambiguously picking.
However, the cases where we unambiguously picked a side may not always be
correct and need to be fixed.
Having list of bids for all files will be helpful in debugging.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8966
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Mon, 14 Sep 2020 19:39:51 +0900] rev 45458
merge with stable
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:52:24 +0900] rev 45457
cmdutil: reimplement finddate() without using walkchangerevs()
It's simpler and slightly faster maybe because a fewer Python ops would
run.
Unscientific benchmark:
$ python -m timeit \
-s 'from mercurial import hg, ui, cmdutil; repo = hg.repository(ui.ui())' \
'cmdutil.finddate(repo.ui, repo, "<2008-01-01")'
(orig) 10 loops, best of 3: 1.45 sec per loop
(new) 10 loops, best of 3: 1.25 sec per loop
Now "hg churn" and "hg grep" are the only users of walkchangerevs(), which
I want to refactor and fix bugs.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 13 Sep 2020 18:14:51 +0900] rev 45456
test-simple-update: add test for -d DATE option
I couldn't find any tests for cmdutil.finddate() except for the abort case.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:46:48 +0900] rev 45455
largefiles: walk history in ascending order while downloading all lfiles
I don't think the order matters. Maybe it's purely because of the use of
walkchangerevs(), which was originally designed for "hg log" command.
Surprisingly, the number of objects fetched in test-largefiles.t has changed.
According to the --verbose output, the order of the following fetches flipped
and the latter got deduplicated.
getting large3:
eb7338044dc27f9bc59b8dd5a246b065ead7a9c4
found
eb7338044dc27f9bc59b8dd5a246b065ead7a9c4 in store
getting sub/large4:
eb7338044dc27f9bc59b8dd5a246b065ead7a9c4
found
eb7338044dc27f9bc59b8dd5a246b065ead7a9c4 in store
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 13 Sep 2020 17:43:19 +0900] rev 45454
largefiles: replace use of walkchangerevs() with simple revset query
Since it does nothing in prepare(), what we're doing is just walking
revisions matching ".hglf" in reverse order.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:47:17 +0900] rev 45453
largefiles: remove unused 'rev' parameter from downloadlfiles()
It's no longer used since
83ead8cb0ff2 "largefiles: implement pull
--all-largefiles as a special case of --lfrev."
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sat, 12 Sep 2020 11:18:12 -0700] rev 45452
resourceutil: document when we expect to take the importlib.resouces code path
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9018
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 10 Sep 2020 22:00:00 -0700] rev 45451
templater: fix reading of templates in frozen binaries with py3 < 3.7
When using a frozen binary with py3 < 3.7, there's no
`importlib.resources` module, so we use the code path that reads the
resources from the file system. That code path expects bytes for
package name and resource name.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9008
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:35:49 -0700] rev 45450
histedit: cache description line
Navigating the curses-based histedit interface can be pretty slow
because it redraws everything whenever you make a change.
This patch simply replaces `@property` by `@util.propertycache` on the
`histeditrule.desc()` function so it's not re-calculated every time
the screen needs to be re-rendered. I timed it on an example of 30
simple commits, where I moved the top commit down 25 steps and then up
25 steps after. Before this patch, that (the whole `hg histedit`
invocation) took 11.6 s of CPU and after this patch it took 0.8 s).
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9016
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:55:08 -0700] rev 45449
tests: make emacs test less strict
It was failing like this for me:
```
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
$ emacs -q -no-site-file -batch -l $TESTDIR/../contrib/hg-test-mode.el \
> -f ert-run-tests-batch-and-exit
Running 1 tests (*) (glob)
- passed 1/1 hg-test-mode--compilation-mode-support
+ passed 1/1 hg-test-mode--compilation-mode-support (0.045732 sec)
- Ran 1 tests, 1 results as expected (*) (glob)
+ Ran 1 tests, 1 results as expected, 0 unexpected (2020-09-11 16:49:56+0000, 0.046034 sec)
```
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9017
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 10 Sep 2020 13:12:34 -0700] rev 45448
graphlog: use '%' only if there are *unresolved* conflicts
In
14d0e89520a2, I made graphlog use '%' for the "other" context when
there's an existing merge state. However, that has confused many
people because it shows up even if all conflicts are already resolved,
which makes it show up even after e.g. `hg update -m` with
automatically resolved conflicts. This patch makes it so we show the
'%' only if there still unresolved conflicts.
This patch replaces my earlier attempt in D8930, where I decided to
automatically clear the mergestate if there are no remaining
conflicts. That had the problem that it wouldn't let the user
re-resolve the conflicts using `hg resolve`.
Note that an in-progress "proper" merge (one that will result in a
commit with two parents, such as after `hg merge`) will already have
two dirstate parents before the commit happens. That means that both
sides of the merge will get drawn as '@' in the graph, since "is
dirstate parent" takes precedence over "is involved in merge
conflict".
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9007
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:24:22 +0530] rev 45447
merge: show number of ancestors in bid merge debug notes
A good number of times, we don't generate an action for a file in
manifestmerge() which can result in bid merge doing the wrong thing.
Mentioning the number of ancestors from which we are bidding will help spot such
cases where we are not returning an action.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8967
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 03 Sep 2020 14:45:16 +0530] rev 45446
debugmergestate: sort extras before printing
Prevents flaky output.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8986
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 24 Aug 2020 18:59:19 +0530] rev 45445
debugmergestate: show extras for files which are not in mergestate
With recent changes and future changes, we will like to store extras information
about files which were merged automatically. Hence, we will have merge extras
for files which are not in the mergestate.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8942