Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:33:46 -0400 merge with stable
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:33:46 -0400] rev 32945
merge with stable
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:08:20 -0700 tests: don't touch the network when using virtualenv
Danek Duvall <danek.duvall@oracle.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:08:20 -0700] rev 32944
tests: don't touch the network when using virtualenv
Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:32:52 -0700 tests: removed ReportedTest exception
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:32:52 -0700] rev 32943
tests: removed ReportedTest exception The only call site called addFailure before raising, which is exactly what the failure exception handler does. So this complexity is not needed. We have test coverage of this "server failed to start" scenario and nothing appeared to change.
Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:22:45 -0700 tests: remove support for warned tests
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:22:45 -0700] rev 32942
tests: remove support for warned tests The previous changeset removed the last caller of addWarn(). So, we rip out that method and all the code related to tracking warned tests in the results system. There was even a comment saying we may want to fold warned tests into the "failed" state, which is what the previous changeset did.
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:49:43 -0400 contrib: add check-code rule to enforce non-use of `python` in tests
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:49:43 -0400] rev 32941
contrib: add check-code rule to enforce non-use of `python` in tests
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:45:02 -0400 cleanup: use $PYTHON to run python in many more tests
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:45:02 -0400] rev 32940
cleanup: use $PYTHON to run python in many more tests Spotted one of these, then wrote a check-code rule that caught them all. It will be the next change.
Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:22:39 -0400 tests: enforce use of $PYTHON in tests
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:22:39 -0400] rev 32939
tests: enforce use of $PYTHON in tests
Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:27:52 -0400 tests: use $PYTHON in #! so we always use the right Python
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Thu, 15 Jun 2017 14:27:52 -0400] rev 32938
tests: use $PYTHON in #! so we always use the right Python
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:33:19 -0400 tests: sed away python #! in test-run-tests.t to avoid some upcoming insanity
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:33:19 -0400] rev 32937
tests: sed away python #! in test-run-tests.t to avoid some upcoming insanity
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:44:56 -0400 tests: remove #! from primes.py in test-highlight.t
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Tue, 20 Jun 2017 08:44:56 -0400] rev 32936
tests: remove #! from primes.py in test-highlight.t It's about to be a source of trouble, but removing it changes a ton of test lines, so doing this change as a standalone commit.
Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:51:36 +0100 keyword: use context manager for rollback locking
Christian Ebert <blacktrash@gmx.net> [Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:51:36 +0100] rev 32935
keyword: use context manager for rollback locking
Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:13:35 -0700 tests: remove WarnTest
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:13:35 -0700] rev 32934
tests: remove WarnTest We would raise this if a test didn't return a result code. AFAICT this can only occur if there is a logic error in the test harness itself. I don't think it is worth the code complexity to distinguish this failure scenario from a regular test failure.
Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:09:13 -0700 tests: remove unused IgnoreTest exception
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:09:13 -0700] rev 32933
tests: remove unused IgnoreTest exception AFAICT its last use was removed in d839e4820da7.
Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:04:42 -0700 tests: use unittest.SkipTest
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:04:42 -0700] rev 32932
tests: use unittest.SkipTest unittest.SkipTest was introduced in Python 2.7. We previously defined it with our own class so we could run on Python 2.6.
Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:23:47 -0700 changegroup: delete "if True" and reflow
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:23:47 -0700] rev 32931
changegroup: delete "if True" and reflow
Thu, 15 Jun 2017 22:46:38 -0700 changegroup: let callers pass in transaction to apply() (API)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 15 Jun 2017 22:46:38 -0700] rev 32930
changegroup: let callers pass in transaction to apply() (API) I think passing in the transaction makes it a little clearer and more consistent with bundle2.
Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:09:14 -0700 repair: create transaction for bundle1 unbundling earlier
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 15 Jun 2017 23:09:14 -0700] rev 32929
repair: create transaction for bundle1 unbundling earlier See earlier patch for motivation.
Thu, 15 Jun 2017 22:18:21 -0700 unbundle: create transaction for bundle1 unbundling earlier
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 15 Jun 2017 22:18:21 -0700] rev 32928
unbundle: create transaction for bundle1 unbundling earlier See earlier patch for motivation.
Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:10:53 -0700 exchange: create transaction for bundle1 unbundling earlier
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:10:53 -0700] rev 32927
exchange: create transaction for bundle1 unbundling earlier changegroup.apply() currently creates a transation if there isn't already one. Having the callers of that method pass in an existing transaction seems a little cleaner. To do that, we need to make sure all callers have a transaction. Since the transaction name is used as a hook argument (HG_TXNNAME), we need to match the name from changegroup.apply().
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:06:23 -0700 changegroup: inline 'publishing' variable in apply()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 00:06:23 -0700] rev 32926
changegroup: inline 'publishing' variable in apply()
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:24:49 -0700 repair: remove unnecessary locking for bookmarks
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:24:49 -0700] rev 32925
repair: remove unnecessary locking for bookmarks The caller has already locked the repo.
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:18:00 -0700 repair: move check for existing transaction earlier
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:18:00 -0700] rev 32924
repair: move check for existing transaction earlier Several benefits: * Gets close the comment describing it * Splits off unrelated comment about "backup" argument * Error checking is customarily done early * If we added an early return to the method, it would still consistently fail if there was an existing transaction (so we would find and fix that case quickly) One test needs updating with for this change, because we no longer create the backup bundle before we fail. I don't see much reason to create that backup bundle. If some command was adding content and then trying to strip it as well within the transaction, we would have a backup for the user, but the risk of that not being discovered in development seems very small.
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:13:28 -0700 strip: remove unncessary "del" and inline variable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 13:13:28 -0700] rev 32923
strip: remove unncessary "del" and inline variable
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:24:21 -0700 repair: clarify in comment that caller must take lock, but not transaction
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:24:21 -0700] rev 32922
repair: clarify in comment that caller must take lock, but not transaction I have checked that all callers have already taken the lock (and if they hadn't, we should have seen tests fail thanks to the 'transaction requires locking' devel warning in localrepo.transaction()).
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:21:37 -0700 amend: use context manager for locking
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:21:37 -0700] rev 32921
amend: use context manager for locking
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:20:29 -0700 strip: use context manager for locking and transaction in stripcmd()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:20:29 -0700] rev 32920
strip: use context manager for locking and transaction in stripcmd()
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:17:31 -0700 strip: use context manager for locking in strip()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:17:31 -0700] rev 32919
strip: use context manager for locking in strip()
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:18:12 -0700 rebase: use context manager for locking in pullrebase()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:18:12 -0700] rev 32918
rebase: use context manager for locking in pullrebase()
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:18:05 -0700 rebase: use context manager for locking in rebase()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 11:18:05 -0700] rev 32917
rebase: use context manager for locking in rebase()
Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:53:54 -0400 test-http-proxy: redirect proxy stdout to /dev/null
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Mon, 19 Jun 2017 21:53:54 -0400] rev 32916
test-http-proxy: redirect proxy stdout to /dev/null This output hasn't been getting flushed, but would alter the log if it ever grew large enough. See 23b07333a8b2.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip