Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:30:43 +0100 bookmarks: primarily use repo lock, not wlock
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:30:43 +0100] rev 15887
bookmarks: primarily use repo lock, not wlock Bookmarks are repository data, not working directory data. Only the current bookmark is working directory data. Some lock shuffling is required to avoid lockout between the initial mock lock and locking of the localrepo instance that is created after copying.
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:29:38 +0100 localrepo: update branchcache in a more reliable way
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Fri, 13 Jan 2012 02:29:38 +0100] rev 15886
localrepo: update branchcache in a more reliable way test-mq-cache.t did apparently look at stale cache content. Testing with different locking mechanism happened to update the cache more frequently and thus caused a test failure.
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:19:08 +0100 tests: make qnew in test-mq-caches.t stable
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:19:08 +0100] rev 15885
tests: make qnew in test-mq-caches.t stable The unstable hashes did for other reasons not show up in the test output.
Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:19:08 +0100 localrepo: remove spurious updatebranchcache return value
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Fri, 13 Jan 2012 01:19:08 +0100] rev 15884
localrepo: remove spurious updatebranchcache return value - it was left over from the refactoring in d01e28657429.
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:29:56 +0100 mq: only save dirty files once when savedirty is called multiple times
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:29:56 +0100] rev 15883
mq: only save dirty files once when savedirty is called multiple times
Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:29:56 +0100 mq: remove early wlock release in qnew
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Wed, 11 Jan 2012 02:29:56 +0100] rev 15882
mq: remove early wlock release in qnew It seems like something that missed the refactoring in 97b734fb9c6f.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip