Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:56:48 +0100 context: make workingctx.forget() really warn about untracked files stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Thu, 16 Feb 2012 12:56:48 +0100] rev 16111
context: make workingctx.forget() really warn about untracked files
Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:01:09 +0900 largefiles: check whether specified patterns are related to largefiles strictly stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:01:09 +0900] rev 16110
largefiles: check whether specified patterns are related to largefiles strictly current 'lfiles_repo.status()' implementation examines whether specified patterns are related to largefiles in working directory (not to STANDIN) or not by NOT-EMPTY-NESS of below list: [f for f in match.files() if f in lfdirstate] but it can not be assumed that all in 'match.files()' are file itself exactly, because user may only specify part of path to match whole under subdirectories recursively. above examination will mis-recognize such pattern as 'not related to largefiles', and executes normal 'status()' procedure. so, 'hg status' shows '?'(unknown) status for largefiles in working directory unexpectedly. this patch examines relation of pattern to largefiles by applying 'match()' on each entries in lfdirstate and checking wheter there is no matched entry. it may increase cost of examination, because it causes of full scan of entries in lfdirstate. so this patch uses normal for-loop instead of list comprehensions, to decrease cost when matching is found.
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:09:23 -0600 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:09:23 -0600] rev 16109
merge with stable
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:52:32 -0600 log: remove caching of all visited revisions (issue3253) stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:52:32 -0600] rev 16108
log: remove caching of all visited revisions (issue3253) Not only does this eat all available memory for some users, it's slower.
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:09:30 -0600 pull: backout change to return code stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:09:30 -0600] rev 16107
pull: backout change to return code This bit a number of people.
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:34:13 +0100 convert: use splicemap entries when sorting revisions (issue1748) stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:34:13 +0100] rev 16106
convert: use splicemap entries when sorting revisions (issue1748) When sorting revisions before converting them, we have to edit the revision graph using splicemap entries. Otherwise, a spliced revision may be converted before its synthetic parents. Invalid splicemap revisions are now detected before starting the conversion.
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:25:49 +0100 convert: turn splicemap into a simple dictionary stable
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:25:49 +0100] rev 16105
convert: turn splicemap into a simple dictionary Parsing the splicemap as a mapfile was a pain because map does not let us override its parsing code and splicemap entries are not key/values. Besides we had no need for mapfiles extra features. Just parse the splicemap and return a dictionary.
Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:50:13 +0100 debugrevspec: mention --verbose to print the parsed tree
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:50:13 +0100] rev 16104
debugrevspec: mention --verbose to print the parsed tree
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -8 +8 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip