Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:12:35 -0400 rebase: handle bookmarks matching revset function names (issue3950) stable
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:12:35 -0400] rev 19642
rebase: handle bookmarks matching revset function names (issue3950) We handled these correctly with all rev-specifying options except, somehow, -r/--rev.
Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:12:35 -0400 rebase: handle bookmarks matching revset function names (issue3950)
Bryan O'Sullivan <bryano@fb.com> [Tue, 03 Sep 2013 15:12:35 -0400] rev 19641
rebase: handle bookmarks matching revset function names (issue3950) We handled these correctly with all rev-specifying options except, somehow, -r/--rev.
Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:28:34 -0500 dispatch: add ability to specify a custom pdb module as a debugger
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:28:34 -0500] rev 19640
dispatch: add ability to specify a custom pdb module as a debugger This adds the ability to specify a config option, ui.debugger, to a custom pdb module, such as ipdb, and have mercurial use that as its debugger. As long as the value of ui.debugger is a loadable module with the set_trace and post_mortem functions, then dispatch will be able to use the custom module. Debugging _parseconfig is still available in the case of an error since it will be caught with a default the value of pdb.post_mortem.
Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:33:07 -0500 dispatch: move command line --config argument parsing to _runcatch()
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Sat, 13 Jul 2013 16:33:07 -0500] rev 19639
dispatch: move command line --config argument parsing to _runcatch() Previously, command line parsing of --config arguments was done in _dispatch. This means that it takes place after activating the debugger. In an upcoming patch, we will add a ui.debugger setting so we need to have this parsing done before _runcatch.
Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:38:30 +0200 mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate
Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Aug 2013 01:38:30 +0200] rev 19638
mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the .hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using mq. This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the corresponding revisions). # HG changeset patch # User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> # Date 1376350710 -7200 # Tue Aug 13 01:38:30 2013 +0200 # Node ID 60897e264858cdcd46f89e27a702086f08adca02 # Parent 2defb5453f223c3027eb2f7788fbddd52bbb3352 mq: update subrepos when applying / unapplying patches that change .hgsubstate Up until now applying or unapplying a patch that modified .hgsubstate would not work as expected because it would not update the subrepos according to the .hgsubstate change. This made it very easy to lose subrepo changes when using mq. This revision also changes the test-mq-subrepo test so that on the qpop / qpush tests. We no longer use the debugsub command to check the state of the subrepos after the qpop and qpush operations. Instead we directly run the id command on the subrepos that we want to check. The reason is that using the debugsub command is misleading because it does not really check the state of the subrepos on the working directory (it just returns what the change that is specified on a given revision). Because of this the tests did not detect the problem that this revision fixes (i.e. that applying a patch did not update the subrepos to the corresponding revisions).
Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:34:04 +0200 subrepo: make submerge() return the merged substate
Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:34:04 +0200] rev 19637
subrepo: make submerge() return the merged substate This will be useful when reusing submerge() to improve the handling of subrepos on mq. # HG changeset patch # User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> # Date 1377117244 -7200 # Wed Aug 21 22:34:04 2013 +0200 # Node ID 2defb5453f223c3027eb2f7788fbddd52bbb3352 # Parent a5c90acff5e61aae714ba6c9457d766c54b4f124 subrepo: make submerge() return the merged substate This will be useful when reusing submerge() to improve the handling of subrepos on mq.
Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:49:39 +0200 mq: look for modified subrepos when checking for local changes
Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> [Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:49:39 +0200] rev 19636
mq: look for modified subrepos when checking for local changes It was possible to apply, unapply, fold, patches (etc) with modified subrepos, which resulted in surprising behavior. For example it was easy to apply a patch with a modified subrepo, and then the refresh it and accidentally end up including the modified subrepo on the refreshed patch. A test has been added to verify this new check. # HG changeset patch # User Angel Ezquerra <angel.ezquerra@gmail.com> # Date 1375742979 -7200 # Tue Aug 06 00:49:39 2013 +0200 # Node ID a5c90acff5e61aae714ba6c9457d766c54b4f124 # Parent 6ac206fb6f27492a98f46bbff090407ee1b1de72 mq: look for modified subrepos when checking for local changes It was possible to apply, unapply, fold, patches (etc) with modified subrepos, which resulted in surprising behavior. For example it was easy to apply a patch with a modified subrepo, and then the refresh it and accidentally end up including the modified subrepo on the refreshed patch. A test has been added to verify this new check.
Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:59:45 +0800 localrepo: get value from the unfiltered caches should check if the attribute existed.
Wei, Elson <elson.wei@gmail.com> [Wed, 07 Aug 2013 09:59:45 +0800] rev 19635
localrepo: get value from the unfiltered caches should check if the attribute existed. If the attribute existed already, it should be returned by getattr(). Otherwise, it will be evaluated again.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -8 +8 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip