Valentin Gatien-Baron <vgatien-baron@janestreet.com> [Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:09:56 -0400] rev 44725
graft: exit 1 on conflicts, like merge
It's more consistent, and makes it nicer to script around hg if you
don't have to ignore exit code 255, which is the error code for
basically everything in hg.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8423
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:58:34 +0200] rev 44724
tests: deal with "ls" vs "ls -A" difference on 2BSD derived systems
BSD-derived systems will use "ls -A" when running as root. Adjust the
test cases to always use the flag and include .hg and related output as
appropiately.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8397
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:53:36 +0200] rev 44723
tests: skip non-readable check for root
Trying to check for errors on non-readable hgrc requires UNIX
permissions, but still won't work for root. So adjust the check.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8396
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Fri, 10 Apr 2020 19:52:33 +0200] rev 44722
tests: skip CVS tests for root
It is not uncommon for cvs to check for root and to refuse work
in that case.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8395
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 15 Apr 2020 22:18:05 -0400] rev 44721
make: drop the `-c` arg to `install` in the documentation makefile
This arg caused `gmake install` on OpenIndiana 2019.10 (illumos) fail with:
install: The -c, -f, -n options each require a directory following!
install: The -c, -f, -n options each require a directory following!
install: The -c, -f, -n options each require a directory following!
gmake[1]: *** [Makefile:41: install] Error 2
gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/share/mercurial/doc'
The workaround is to run `gmake install-bin`.
The man page for 10.14 says this is to copy the file and is only for
compatability, as it is the default. The CentOS 7 man page says it is ignored.
The top level makefile doesn't use this argument at all, so I'm not sure why
it's here.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8439
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Tue, 14 Apr 2020 18:51:23 -0400] rev 44720
phabricator: restack any new orphans created by phabsend (
issue6045)
Previously, posting a new review for a non head commit would orphan the head.
The general case is any descendant of the selected revisions got orphaned if
this was the first time the selected revisions were submitted. It doesn't
happen when resubmitting. I've already had coworkers hit this a few times and
get confused. Since posting a review isn't generally thought of as an editing
operation, it would probably be easier for new users if we just restacked.
This avoids restacking existing orphans around the submission because that may
involve merge conflict resolution. Users who already have orphans should know
how to stabilize them anyway.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8438
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 12 Apr 2020 13:11:42 -0400] rev 44719
phabricator: prevent posting obsolete commits
I don't see why this would be useful in the first place. But I had a coworker
submit a single commit that was not a branch head, and the result was to orphan
its child and keep the original commit visible. He then did up arrow + Enter,
and it happily created a new review (since the URL isn't amended into the
original commit specified on the command line) and a new successor, resulting in
a local divergence. I'd like to fix the issue with creating orphans, but this
is simple enough to prevent on its own.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8437
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Tue, 03 Mar 2020 17:37:09 -0500] rev 44718
phabricator: avoid creating unstable children within the review stack
The instability occurred when rebasing something that has already been submitted
onto something that hasn't, and then resubmitting the stack. Or as the test
shows, just resubmitting and including something earlier that wasn't previously
submitted.
There's a general case here where any children (not just the ones in the range
of commits posted for review) should be re-stabilized. But handling the
selected commits here will cause the `local:commit` node values that are tracked
on Phabricator to be properly kept in sync.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8436
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 08 Apr 2020 17:30:10 -0400] rev 44717
phabricator: add an option to fold several commits into one review (
issue6244)
Now that all of the pieces are in place, alter the user facing command to allow
it. This is the default behavior when using `arc`, but I much prefer the 1:1
approach, and I'm tempted to mark this advanced to limit its abuse. I started
out calling this `--no-stack` like the feature request suggested, but I found it
less obvious (especially when writing the code), so I went with the `hg fold`
analogue.
This will populate the `Commits` tab in the web UI with the hash of each commit
folded into the review. From experimentation, it seems to list them in the
order they are received from the extension instead of the actual parent/child
relationship. The extension sends them in sorted order, thanks to
`templatefilters.json()`. Since there's enough info there for them to put
things in the right order, JSON is unordered aside from lists (IIUC), and there
doesn't seem to be any harmful side effects, I guess we write this off as their
bug. It is simple enough to workaround by putting a check for `util.sortdict`
into `templatefilters.json()`, and don't resort in that case.
There are a handful of restrictions that are documented in the code, which
somebody could probably fix if they're interested. Notably, this requires the
(default) `--amend` option, because there's not an easy way to apply a local tag
across several commits. This also doesn't do preflight checking to ensure that
all previous commits that were part of a single review are selected when
updating. That seems expensive. What happens is the excluded commit is dropped
from the review, but it keeps the Differential Revision line in the commit
message. Not everything can be edited, so it doesn't seem worth making the code
even more complicated to handle this edge case.
There are a couple of "obsolete feature not enabled but X markers found!"
messages that appeared on Windows but not macOS. I have no idea what's going on
here, but that's an unrelated issue, so I conditionalized those lines.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8314
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Wed, 08 Apr 2020 17:07:19 -0400] rev 44716
tests: move the phabricator auth token to the global config file
The next commit introduces a new repo to simplify its development. This value
needs to be modified to record tests, so it doesn't make sense to have to do
that twice. The callsign and URL are *not* moved because there are tests that
fallback to the .arcconfig file when those aren't present.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8390