Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:22:02 +0100 scheme: move the drive letter checking in its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:22:02 +0100] rev 49689
scheme: move the drive letter checking in its own function This help the readability of the main function as is was taking much more room than the main logic.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:48:08 +0100 peer-or-repo: split the scheme between repo and peer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:48:08 +0100] rev 49688
peer-or-repo: split the scheme between repo and peer Some of the scheme will always produce a peer and some will always produce a repository. So lets use different mapping to reduce the ambiguity.
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:55:15 +0100 peer-or-repo: stop relying on AttributeError in `islocal`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 30 Nov 2022 13:55:15 +0100] rev 49687
peer-or-repo: stop relying on AttributeError in `islocal` This will confused pytypes in a future changeset.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:42:08 +0100 repo-or-peer: deprecate calling `islocal` on non-path object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 21:42:08 +0100] rev 49686
repo-or-peer: deprecate calling `islocal` on non-path object There object have a `.local()` method and should use it.
Thu, 01 Dec 2022 15:27:11 +0400 tests: add the missing space to test-hghave.t (issue6762) stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 01 Dec 2022 15:27:11 +0400] rev 49685
tests: add the missing space to test-hghave.t (issue6762) log() in run-tests.py add a space to the end of all messages that it prints, and I missed this fact in my previous patch.
Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:12:48 +0100 share: stop using 'islocal' with repo instance
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 30 Nov 2022 11:12:48 +0100] rev 49684
share: stop using 'islocal' with repo instance Having this level of polymorphism of the `islocal` function is weird, and we already have a way to know if the repo is local from the object itself. We are about to deprecate passing a non-bytes object to `islocal`, so clean this up beforehand. We might want to clean up this function too in the future, however this is another adventure.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:54:55 +0100 peer-or-repo: make sure object in "scheme" have a `instance` object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 19:54:55 +0100] rev 49683
peer-or-repo: make sure object in "scheme" have a `instance` object The previous form of having heterogeneous object in the dictionnary makes things more complicated than they needed to be. I am not super happy about the current (especially around 'islocal', that most item do not have), but this is already much better.
Tue, 29 Nov 2022 18:30:54 +0100 peer-or-repo: move the object setup in its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 29 Nov 2022 18:30:54 +0100] rev 49682
peer-or-repo: move the object setup in its own function The `_peerorrepo` function is problematic, because it can build different types of object (repository and peer). This make it hard to adjust the arguments to the type of object we needs. So this patch start a series of change to create peer and repo without going through a common function. We move the part of the function doing object setup it its own function to make it simpler to reuse in others contexts.
Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:53:17 -0500 delta-find: use a single snapshot cache when applying a group to an object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:53:17 -0500] rev 49681
delta-find: use a single snapshot cache when applying a group to an object This will avoid walking the revlog over and over again in some situations. The difference is hard to show in our current benchmark suite, as the gain is lower than their overall instability.
Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:55:55 -0500 delta-find: make sure we only use newer full snapshot as candidate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 06 Nov 2022 17:55:55 -0500] rev 49680
delta-find: make sure we only use newer full snapshot as candidate The current code does not needs to protect against this, as there are no older snapshot in the current cache. However as we are getting ready to reuse this cache from one revision to another, we need the code to protect itself about what's coming.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip