Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 01 Jul 2018 00:31:57 +0530] rev 38515
rebase: refactor logic to read rebasestate in a separate function
This will help us in plugging the use of state.cmdstate() to read rebasestate.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3873
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:07:22 +0100] rev 38514
revlog: reuse 'descendant' implemention in 'isancestor'
The two functions do the same thing, but one takes nodes while the other takes
revs. Using one to implement the other make sense.
We should probably cleanup the API at some point to avoid having so many similar
functions. However, we focus on an efficient implementation for now.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 22 Jun 2018 00:05:20 +0100] rev 38513
revlog: efficient implementation of 'descendant'
Iterating over descendants is costly, because there are no "parent -> children"
pointers. Walking the other way around is much more efficient, especially on
large repositories, where descendant walks can cost seconds. And the other hand,
common ancestors code follows links in the right direction and has a compiled
implementation.
In real life usage, this saved up to 80s during some pull operations, where
descendant test happens in extension code.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 21 Jun 2018 23:56:51 +0100] rev 38512
revlog: refactor out the rev-oriented part of commonancestorheads
We plan to use this in a function taking revs as argument. Round trips to nodes
seem silly.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 21 Jun 2018 23:53:43 +0100] rev 38511
revlog: do inclusive descendant testing (API)
In many other places, a revision is considered a descendant of itself. We
update the behavior of `revlog.descendant()` to match this. (for example.
`revlog.isancestor` does inclusive testing).
No tests break, so it seems safe to do so.
This will make it easier to use a more efficient implementation in a later
changeset.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 30 Jun 2018 16:06:05 -0700] rev 38510
manifest: make cachesize a private attribute
AFAICT this isn't accessed outside the class. It is a private
attribute and its naming should reflect that.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3868