Fri, 02 Mar 2018 02:44:49 +0530 py3: slice over bytes to prevent getting ascii values
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 02 Mar 2018 02:44:49 +0530] rev 36537
py3: slice over bytes to prevent getting ascii values This fixed reading of mergestate files and fixes 14 tests on Python 3. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2522
Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:26:00 -0800 wireprotoserver: move SSHV1 and SSHV2 constants to wireprototypes
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:26:00 -0800] rev 36536
wireprotoserver: move SSHV1 and SSHV2 constants to wireprototypes To avoid a cycle between modules in an upcoming commit. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2482
Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:21:29 -0800 wireproto: use named arguments for commandentry
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:21:29 -0800] rev 36535
wireproto: use named arguments for commandentry We'll be adding more arguments in upcoming commits. Using named arguments will make the code easier to read. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2481
Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:01:13 -0800 debugcommands: support for triggering push protocol
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 26 Feb 2018 18:01:13 -0800] rev 36534
debugcommands: support for triggering push protocol The mechanism for pushing to a remote is a bit more complicated than other commands. On SSH, we wait for a positive reply from the server before we start sending the bundle payload. This commit adds a mechanism to the "command" action in `hg debugwireproto` to trigger the "push protocol" and to specify a file whose contents should be submitted as the command payload. With this new feature, we implement a handful of tests for the "unbundle" command. We try to cover various server failures and hook/output scenarios so protocol behavior is as comprehensively tested as possible. Even with so much test output, we only cover bundle1 with Python hooks. There's still a lot of test coverage that needs to be implemented. But this is certainly a good start. Because there are so many new tests, we split these tests into their own test file. In order to make output deterministic, we need to disable the doublepipe primitive. We add an option to `hg debugwireproto` to do that. Because something in the bowels of the peer does a read of stderr, we still capture read I/O from stderr. So there is test coverage of what the server emits. The tests around I/O capture some wonkiness. For example, interleaved ui.write() and ui.write_err() calls are emitted in order. However, (presumably due to buffering), print() to sys.stdout and sys.stderr aren't in order. We currently only test bundle1 because bundle2 is substantially harder to test because it is more complicated (the server responds with a stream containing a bundle2 instead of a frame). Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2471
Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:12:03 -0800 sshpeer: support not reading and forwarding stderr
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:12:03 -0800] rev 36533
sshpeer: support not reading and forwarding stderr The "doublepipe" primitive as used by sshpeer will automatically read from stderr and forward output to the local ui. This poses problems for deterministic testing because reads may not be consistent. For example, the server may not be done sending all output to stderr and the client will perform different numbers of read operations or will read from stderr and stdout at different times. To make tests deterministic, we'll need to disable the "doublepipe" primitive and perform stderr I/O explicitly. We add an argument to the sshpeer constructor to disable the use of the doublepipe. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2467
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:03:27 -0800 tests: add wire protocol tests for pushkey
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:03:27 -0800] rev 36532
tests: add wire protocol tests for pushkey Let's get the wire format of some pushkey requests in test-ssh-proto.t. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2466
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:50:59 -0800 debugcommands: support for sending "batch" requests
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 23 Feb 2018 12:50:59 -0800] rev 36531
debugcommands: support for sending "batch" requests Let's teach `hg debugwireproto` to send "batch" requests. The easiest way to implement this was as a pair of instructions to begin and end a batched operation. Otherwise, we would have to reinvent the parsing wheel or factor out the parsing code. To prove it works, we add a batched request to test-ssh-proto.t. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2408
Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:27:30 -0800 debugcommands: allow sending of simple commands with debugwireproto
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:27:30 -0800] rev 36530
debugcommands: allow sending of simple commands with debugwireproto Previously, we only had support for low-level "raw" operations. A goal of `hg debugwireproto` is to allow easily performing higher-level primitives, such as sending a wire protocol command and reading its response. We implement a "command" action that does just this. Currently, we only support simple commands (those without payloads). We have basic support for sending command arguments. We don't yet support sending dictionary arguments. This will be implemented later. To prove it works, we add tests to test-ssh-proto.t that send some "listkeys" commands. Note: we don't observe/report os.read() events because these may not be deterministic. We instead observe/report the read() and readline() operations on the bufferedinputpipe. These *should* be deterministic. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2406
Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:40:12 -0800 wireproto: sort response to listkeys
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Fri, 23 Feb 2018 09:40:12 -0800] rev 36529
wireproto: sort response to listkeys The listkeys protocol is defined to produce a dictionary. pushkey.decodekeys() uses a plain dict to hold the decoded results of the wire protocol response. So order should not matter. Upcoming tests will verify low-level output of wire protocol commands and the non-deterministic emitting of listkeys was causing intermittent failures. So we make the output of listkeys deterministic. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2405
Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:24:54 -0800 debugcommands: add debugwireproto command
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Thu, 01 Mar 2018 08:24:54 -0800] rev 36528
debugcommands: add debugwireproto command We currently don't have a low-level mechanism for sending arbitrary wire protocol commands. Having a generic and robust mechanism for sending wire protocol commands, examining wire data, etc would make it vastly easier to test the wire protocol and debug server operation. This is a problem I've wanted a solution for numerous times, especially recently as I've been hacking on a new version of the wire protocol. This commit establishes a `hg debugwireproto` command for sending data to a peer. The command invents a mini language for specifying actions to take. This will enable a lot of flexibility for issuing commands and testing variations for how commands are sent. Right now, we only support low-level raw sends and receives. These are probably the least valuable commands to intended users of this command. But they are the most useful commands to implement to bootstrap the feature (I've chosen to reimplement test-ssh-proto.t using this command to prove its usefulness). My eventual goal of `hg debugwireproto` is to allow calling wire protocol commands with a human-friendly interface. Essentially, people can type in a command name and arguments and `hg debugwireproto` will figure out how to send that on the wire. I'd love to eventually be able to save the server's raw response to a file. This would allow us to e.g. call "getbundle" wire protocol commands easily. test-ssh-proto.t has been updated to use the new command in lieu of piping directly to a server process. As part of the transition, test behavior improved. Before, we piped all request data to the server at once. Now, we have explicit control over the ordering of operations. e.g. we can send one command, receive its response, then send another command. This will allow us to more robustly test race conditions, buffering behavior, etc. There were some subtle changes in test behavior. For example, previous behavior would often send trailing newlines to the server. The new mechanism doesn't treat literal newlines specially and requires newlines be escaped in the payload. Because the new logging code is very low level, it is easy to introduce race conditions in tests. For example, the number of bytes returned by a read() may vary depending on load. This is why tests make heavy use of "readline" for consuming data: the result of that operation should be deterministic and not subject to race conditions. There are still some uses of "readavailable." However, those are only for reading from stderr. I was able to reproduce timing issues with my system under load when using "readavailable" globally. But if I "readline" to grab stdout, "readavailable" appears to work deterministically for stderr. I think this is because the server writes to stderr first. As long as the OS delivers writes to pipes in the same order they were made, this should work. If there are timing issues, we can introduce a mechanism to readline from stderr. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2392
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip