Mon, 01 May 2017 15:38:57 +0200 color: point to the config help in global help topic stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 01 May 2017 15:38:57 +0200] rev 32092
color: point to the config help in global help topic We point out at the help of the config option for user who wants to learn more about the possible config value. The suggested command returns some other extra (color related) results, but this is bug to fix outside of the freeze.
Mon, 01 May 2017 15:38:07 +0200 color: reflect the new default in global help topic stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 01 May 2017 15:38:07 +0200] rev 32091
color: reflect the new default in global help topic We point out that color is enabled by default.
Mon, 01 May 2017 11:04:10 -0700 docs: describe ui.color consistently with --color stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 01 May 2017 11:04:10 -0700] rev 32090
docs: describe ui.color consistently with --color The --color option is described to accept "boolean, always, auto, never, or debug". Let's use a similar description for ui.color. Also fix the formatting to use double quotes as we seem to use for about half the values in config.txt (the other half uses double backticks). Also use uppercase Boolean for consistency within the file.
Mon, 01 May 2017 16:09:35 +0200 test: glob out variation from 'HGPORT' length stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 01 May 2017 16:09:35 +0200] rev 32089
test: glob out variation from 'HGPORT' length On system where HGTEST_PORT is configured to a value an order a magnitude lower or higher than the default. The number of digit in the HGPORT changes and this test breaks.
Mon, 01 May 2017 19:59:13 +0900 lock: avoid unintentional lock acquisition at failure of readlock stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 01 May 2017 19:59:13 +0900] rev 32088
lock: avoid unintentional lock acquisition at failure of readlock Acquiring lock by vfs.makelock() and getting lock holder (aka "locker") information by vfs.readlock() aren't atomic action. Therefore, failure of the former doesn't ensure success of the latter. Before this patch, lock is unintentionally acquired, if ENOENT causes failure of vfs.readlock() while 5 times retrying, because lock._trylock() returns to caller silently after retrying, and lock.lock() assumes that lock._trylock() returns successfully only if lock is acquired. In this case, lock symlink (or file) isn't created, even though lock is treated as acquired in memory. To avoid this issue, this patch makes lock._trylock() raise LockHeld(EAGAIN) at the end of it, if lock isn't acquired while retrying. An empty "locker" meaning "busy for frequent lock/unlock by many processes" might appear in an abortion message, if lock acquisition fails. Therefore, this patch also does: - use '%r' to increase visibility of "locker", even if it is empty - show hint message to explain what empty "locker" means
Mon, 01 May 2017 19:58:52 +0900 lock: avoid unintentional lock acquisition at failure of readlock stable
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 01 May 2017 19:58:52 +0900] rev 32087
lock: avoid unintentional lock acquisition at failure of readlock Acquiring lock by vfs.makelock() and getting lock holder (aka "locker") information by vfs.readlock() aren't atomic action. Therefore, failure of the former doesn't ensure success of the latter. Before this patch, lock is unintentionally acquired, if self.parentlock is None (this is default value), and lock._readlock() returns None for ENOENT at vfs.readlock(), because these None are recognized as equal to each other. In this case, lock symlink (or file) isn't created, even though lock is treated as acquired in memory. To avoid this issue, this patch retries lock acquisition immediately, if lock._readlock() returns None "locker". This issue will be covered by a test added in subsequent patch, because simple emulation of ENOENT at vfs.readlock() easily causes another issue. "raising ENOENT only at the first vfs.readlock() invocation" is too complicated for unit test, IMHO.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip