Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:12:01 -0700 rebase: use revnums (not nodes) for set of extinct revisions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:12:01 -0700] rev 38673
rebase: use revnums (not nodes) for set of extinct revisions There is no need to convert extinct revisions to nodeids. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3942
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:01:47 -0700 rebase: avoid converting from nodes to revnums twice
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:01:47 -0700] rev 38672
rebase: avoid converting from nodes to revnums twice In the case where the node has successors, but none of them is an ancestor of the destination, we would iterate over the successor nodes twice, check if they're in the repo and convert them to revnums. I doubt it's a measureable cost, but it gets simpler this way too. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3941
Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:03:39 -0700 rebase: reduce scope of a variable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 11 Jul 2018 15:03:39 -0700] rev 38671
rebase: reduce scope of a variable Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3940
Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:22:28 -0700 context: rename descendant() to isancestorof()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 12 Jul 2018 08:22:28 -0700] rev 38670
context: rename descendant() to isancestorof() This makes the direction much clearer, IMO. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3936
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip