Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:14:50 +0200 histedit: move outgoing processing to its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:14:50 +0200] rev 19021
histedit: move outgoing processing to its own function Every piece of code extracted from the main command is a win. We simplify changeset determination in the process. Parent ceases being a list before becoming a node. We how have a root variable containing a node all the time.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:17:13 +0200 histedit: move all arguments checks to the beginning of the command
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:17:13 +0200] rev 19020
histedit: move all arguments checks to the beginning of the command This changeset move all checks and raises related to arguments validation to the top of the file. This gathers all the logic in one place and clarifies the code doing actual work. This paves the way for splitting this gigantic function in separated functions. A `goal` variable is introduced in the process. It holds the action to be done by this invocation (new, continue or abort). An invalid invocation is found in the process (the new code is a bit stricter).
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:57:25 -0500 histedit-test: generalise --commands "-" usage
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 21:57:25 -0500] rev 19019
histedit-test: generalise --commands "-" usage This is simpler than temporary file version. There some minor test changes since commit messages are no longer modifed. There is still some tests using --commands with a real file.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:48:37 +0200 histedit: allow "-" as a command file
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:48:37 +0200] rev 19018
histedit: allow "-" as a command file When "-" is specified as a command file, we read rules from stdin. Alter a single test to demo the behavior, but most of them could benefit from this. There is minor change in test output resulting from the fact we no longer change log messages.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:58:25 +0200 histedit: properly handle --continue on empty fold
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:58:25 +0200] rev 19017
histedit: properly handle --continue on empty fold When all changes from the fold have been dropped, the --continue code was confused. This changeset handles this case. The test for this case existed but was broken.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:50:17 +0200 histedit-test: replace obscure python script by a plain file
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 20:50:17 +0200] rev 19016
histedit-test: replace obscure python script by a plain file One of the tests uses a python script to edit the histedit commands on the fly. It was hard to read and likely to break. This is replaced by a plain command file. Doing so made me discover that the python script is incorrect. The "+6" regexp never matched because the revision number is wrong. This error is kept in the replacement for now. Fixing the histedit command triggers a traceback in histedit. A later changeset will fix the error and restore the intended test.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:22:38 +0200 test: improve documentation of some histedit tests
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 16:22:38 +0200] rev 19015
test: improve documentation of some histedit tests Each test section is clearly separated from the others and gains some helpful documentation.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:24:52 +0200 test: use a lighter log style in histedit test
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 23:24:52 +0200] rev 19014
test: use a lighter log style in histedit test The default log displays a log of information that is useless for histedit tests. Having a cleaner log help readability of those tests a lot. This does not change anything to the test semantic.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:00:41 -0500 subrepo: add regression test for issue3870
Kevin Bullock <kbullock@ringworld.org> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:00:41 -0500] rev 19013
subrepo: add regression test for issue3870
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:00:05 -0500 subrepo: clone of git sub-repository creates incorrect git branch (issue3870)
pozheg <pozheg@gmail.com> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:00:05 -0500] rev 19012
subrepo: clone of git sub-repository creates incorrect git branch (issue3870) Mercurial handles git subrepos by incorrect way. If the mercurial repo has a git sub-repo and somebody started a new branch in the subrepo and push it into git, the next one who will clone the whole repo will get incorrect branch name in the git subrepo.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:39:37 -0700 dispatch: print 'abort:' when a pre-command hook fails (BC)
Siddharth Agarwal <sid0@fb.com> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:39:37 -0700] rev 19011
dispatch: print 'abort:' when a pre-command hook fails (BC) This also changes the exit code from whatever the hook returned to 255. This brings it in line with all the other hooks that abort.
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:31:56 +0200 largefiles: don't hash all largefiles when initializing a lfdirstate
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:31:56 +0200] rev 19010
largefiles: don't hash all largefiles when initializing a lfdirstate The largefiles will be hashed on demand if necessary ... and sometimes it isn't necessary.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:40:21 +0200 largefiles: use filechunkiter for iterating largefile when serving getlfile
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 00:40:21 +0200] rev 19009
largefiles: use filechunkiter for iterating largefile when serving getlfile The default file iterator is line based and will give odd chunk sizes - often very short and relatively expensive.
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:37:43 +0200 largefiles: stat all largefiles in one batch before downloading
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:37:43 +0200] rev 19008
largefiles: stat all largefiles in one batch before downloading This avoids a lot of expensive roundtrips to remote repositories ... but might be slightly slower for local operations. This will also change some aborts on missing files to warnings. That will in some situations make it possible to continue working on a repository with missing largefiles.
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:34:36 +0200 largefiles: 'put' should store 'source' file in under 'hash', also in localstore
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:34:36 +0200] rev 19007
largefiles: 'put' should store 'source' file in under 'hash', also in localstore
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:35:10 +0200 largefiles: getlfile must hit end of HTTP chunked streams to reuse connections
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 04:35:10 +0200] rev 19006
largefiles: getlfile must hit end of HTTP chunked streams to reuse connections We did read the exactly the right number of bytes from the response body. But if the response came in chunked encoding then that meant that the HTTP layer still hadn't read the last 0-sized chunk and expected the app layer to read more data from the stream. The app layer was however happy and sent another request which had to be sent on another HTTP connection while the old one was lingering until some other event closed the connection. Adding an extra read where we expect to hit the end of file makes the HTTP connection ready for reuse. This thus plugs a real socket leak. To distinguish HTTP from SSH we look at self's class, just like it is done in putlfile.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:55:57 +0200 largefiles: drop limitreader, use filechunkiter limit
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:55:57 +0200] rev 19005
largefiles: drop limitreader, use filechunkiter limit filechunkiter.close was a noop.
Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:46:39 +0200 largefiles: move protocol conversion into getlfile and make it an iterable
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Tue, 16 Apr 2013 01:46:39 +0200] rev 19004
largefiles: move protocol conversion into getlfile and make it an iterable Avoid the intermediate limitreader and filechunkiter between getlfile and copyandhash - return the right protocol and put the complexity where it better can be managed.
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:47:04 +0200 largefiles: don't close the fd passed to store._getfile
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:47:04 +0200] rev 19003
largefiles: don't close the fd passed to store._getfile
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:43:50 +0200 largefiles: remove blecch from lfutil.copyandhash - don't close the passed fd
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:43:50 +0200] rev 19002
largefiles: remove blecch from lfutil.copyandhash - don't close the passed fd
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:43:44 +0200 largefiles: drop lfutil.blockstream - use filechunkiter like everybody else
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:43:44 +0200] rev 19001
largefiles: drop lfutil.blockstream - use filechunkiter like everybody else The old chunk size is kept - just to avoid changing it.
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:35:43 +0200 largefiles: refactoring - use findfile in localstore._getfile
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:35:43 +0200] rev 19000
largefiles: refactoring - use findfile in localstore._getfile
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:35:18 +0200 largefiles: refactoring - return hex from _getfile and copyandhash
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:35:18 +0200] rev 18999
largefiles: refactoring - return hex from _getfile and copyandhash
Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:32:33 +0200 largefiles: refactoring - create destination dir in lfutil.link
Mads Kiilerich <madski@unity3d.com> [Mon, 15 Apr 2013 23:32:33 +0200] rev 18998
largefiles: refactoring - create destination dir in lfutil.link
Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:11 +0900 summary: clear "commonincoming" also if branches are different
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:11 +0900] rev 18997
summary: clear "commonincoming" also if branches are different Before this patch, "commonincoming" calculated by "discovery.findcommonincoming()" is cleared, only if "default" URL without branch part (tail "#branch" of URL) differs from "default-push" URL without branch part. But common revisions in "commonincoming" calculated for a branch doesn't include ones for another branch, even if URLs without branch part are same. The result of "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()" invocation with such "commonincoming" becomes incorrect in some cases. This patch clears "commonincoming", also if branch part of "default" differs from one of "default-push". To avoid redundant looking up: - "ui.expandpath('default')" and "ui.expandpath('default-push', 'default')" are not compared directly, even though they contain branch information, because they are not yet normalized by "hg.parseurl()": tail "/" of path, for example - "commonincoming" is not cleared, if branch isn't specified in "default" URL, because such "commonincoming" contains common revisions for all branches This patch also tests "different path, same branch" pattern to check careless degrading around comparison between source and destination.
Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:11 +0900 summary: make "incoming" information sensitive to branch in URL (issue3830)
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:11 +0900] rev 18996
summary: make "incoming" information sensitive to branch in URL (issue3830) Before this patch, "incoming" information of "hg summary --remote" is not sensitive to the branch specified in the URL of the destination repository, even though "hg pull"/"hg incoming" are so. Invocation of "discovery.findcommonincoming()" without "heads" argument treats revisions on branches other than the one specified in the URL as incoming ones unexpectedly. This patch looks head revisions, which are already detected by "hg.addbranchrevs()" from URL, up against "other" repository, and invokes "discovery.findcommonincoming()" with list of them as "heads" to limit calculation of incoming revisions.
Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:10 +0900 histedit: make "hg histedit" sensitive to branch in URL
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:10 +0900] rev 18995
histedit: make "hg histedit" sensitive to branch in URL Before this patch, "hg histedit" are not sensitive to the branch specified in the URL of the destination repository, even though "hg push"/"hg outgoing" are so: Invocation of "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()" without "onlyheads" argument treats revisions on branches other than the one specified in the URL as outgoing ones unexpectedly. This patch specifies list of head revisions, which are already detected by "hg.addbranchrevs()" from URL and looked up against local repository, as "onlyheads" to "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()" to limit calculation of outgoing revisions.
Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:10 +0900 summary: make "outgoing" information sensitive to branch in URL (issue3829)
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Tue, 09 Apr 2013 23:40:10 +0900] rev 18994
summary: make "outgoing" information sensitive to branch in URL (issue3829) Before this patch, "outgoing" information of "hg summary --remote" is not sensitive to the branch specified in the URL of the destination repository, even though "hg push"/"hg outgoing" are so: Invocation of "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()" without "onlyheads" argument treats revisions on branches other than the one specified in the URL as outgoing ones unexpectedly. This patch looks head revisions, which are already detected by "hg.addbranchrevs()" from URL, up against local repository, and invokes "discovery.findcommonoutgoing()" with list of them as "onlyheads" to limit calculation of outgoing revisions.
Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:57:16 +0900 annotate: increase refcount of each revisions correctly (issue3841)
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:57:16 +0900] rev 18993
annotate: increase refcount of each revisions correctly (issue3841) Before this patch, refcount (managed in "needed") of parents of each revisions in "visit" is increased, only when parent is not annotated yet (examined by "p not in hist"). But this causes less refcount of the revision like "A" in the tree below ("A" is assumed as the second parent of "C"): A --- B --- C \ / \-----/ Steps of annotation for "C" in this case are shown below: 1. for "C" 1.1 increase refcount of "B" 1.2 increase refcount of "A" (=> 1) 1.3 defer annotation for "C" 2. for "A" 2.1 annotate for "A" (=> put result into "hist[A]") 2.2 clear "pcache[A]" ("pcache[A] = []") 3. for "B" 3.1 not increase refcount of "A", because "A not in hist" is False 3.2 annotate for "B" 3.3 decrease refcount of "A" (=> 0) 3.4 delete "hist[A]", even though "A" is still needed by "C" 3.5 clear "pcache[B]" 4. for "C", again 4.1 not increase refcount of "B", because "B not in hist" is False 4.2 increase refcount of "A" (=> 1) 4.3 defer annotation for "C" 5. for "A", again 5.1 annotate for "A" (=> put result into "hist[A]", again) 5.2 clear "pcache[A]" 6. for "C", once again 6.1 not increase refcount of "B", because "B not in hist" is False 6.2 not increase refcount of "A", because "A not in hist" is False 6.3 annotate for "C" 6.4 decrease refcount of "A", and delete "hist[A]" 6.5 decrease refcount of "B", and delete "hist[B]" 6.6 clear "pcache[C]" At step (5.1), annotation for "A" mis-recognizes that all lines are created at "A", because "pcache[A]" already cleared at step (2.2) prevents from scanning ancestors of "A". So, annotation for "C" or its descendants loses information about "A" or its ancestors. The root cause of this problem is that refcount of "A" is decreased at step (3.3), even though it isn't increased at step (3.1). To increase refcount correctly, this patch increases refcount of each parents of each revisions: - regardless of "p not in hist" or not, and - only once for each revisions in "visit" (by "not pcached") In fact, this problem should occur only on legacy repositories in which a filelog includes the merging between the revision and its ancestor (as the second parent), because: - tree is scanned in depth-first without such merging, revisions in "visit" refer different revisions as parent each other - recent Mercurial doesn't allow such merging changelog and manifest can include such merging someway, but filelogs can't, because "localrepository._filecommit()" converts such merging request to linear history. This patch tests merging cases below: these cases are from filelog of "mercurial/commands.py" in the repository of Mercurial itself. - both parents are same 10 --- 11 --- 12 \_/ filelogrev: changesetid: 10 00ea3613f82c 11 fc4a6e5b5812 12 4f802588cdfb - the second parent is also ancestor of the first one 37 --- 38 --- 39 --- 40 \________/ filelogrev: changesetid: 37 f8d56da6ac8f 38 38919e1c254d 39 d3400605d246 40 f06a4a3b86a7
Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:57:15 +0900 annotate: reuse already calculated annotation
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Fri, 29 Mar 2013 22:57:15 +0900] rev 18992
annotate: reuse already calculated annotation Before this patch, annotation is re-calculated even if it is already calculated. This may cause unexpected annotation, because already cleared "pcache" ("pcache[f] = []") prevents from scanning ancestors. This patch reuses already calculated annotation if it is available. In fact, "reusable" situation should be seen only on legacy repositories in which a filelog include the merging between the revision and its ancestor, because: - tree is scanned in depth-first without such merging, annotation result should be released soon - recent Mercurial doesn't allow such merging changelog and manifest can include such merging someway, but filelogs can't, because "localrepository._filecommit()" converts such merging request to linear history.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip