Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:48:27 -0700] rev 46837
rebase: don't call rewriteutil.precheck() with to-be-skipped commits
It's clearly incorrect to call `rewriteutil.precheck()` for commits
that we're not about to rewrite. We haven't noticed yet because the
function doesn't check for divergence, but I'm about to teach it to do
that.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10259
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:15:40 -0700] rev 46836
reabase: call rewriteutil.precheck() a bit later
We now filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits in
`_handleskippingobsolete()`. The filtered-out commits are removed from
the rebase set (`destmap` and `state`). We should therefore call
`rewriteutil.precheck()` after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. This patch
does that. It hasn't mattered so far because `rewriteutil.precheck()`
doesn't yet check for divergence, but it will soon.
This affects one test where we now fail because the user is trying to
rebase an ancestor instead of failing because they tried to rebase a
public commit. We have several similar tests just after, where we
still fail because of the phase, so that seems fine. The difference in
behavior also seems fine to me.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10258
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:49:31 -0700] rev 46835
rebase: set `prepared = True` at very end of `_preparenewrebase()`
Once we've set `rebaseruntime.prepared = True`, `rebaseruntime.repo`
starts returning the unfiltered repo. That will make my next patch
break, because that patch moves the call to `rewriteutil.precheck()`
after the call to `_handleskippingobsolete()`, which current happens
after `prepared = True`. We therefore need to prepare by moving
`prepared = True` a bit later, after `_handleskippingobsolete()`. I
don't think that matters for that call.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10257
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Mar 2021 22:52:59 -0700] rev 46834
rebase: filter out descendants of divergence-causing commits earlier
`hg rebase` treats obsolete commits differently depending what has
happened to the commit:
1) Obsolete commit without non-obsolete successors: Skipped, and a
note is printed ("it has no successor").
2) Obsolete commit with a successor in the destination (ancestor of
it): Skipped, and a note is printed ("already in destination").
3) Obsolete commit with a successor in the rebase set: The commit and
its descendants are skipped, and a note is printed ("not rebasing
<commit> and its descendants as this would cause divergence"), unless
`allowdivergence` config set.
4) Obsolete commit with a successor elsewhere: Error ("this rebase
will cause divergences"), unless `allowdivergence` config set.
Before this patch, we did all those checks up front, except for (3),
which was checked later. The later check consisted of two parts: 1)
filtering out of descendants, and 2) conditionally printing message if
the `allowdivergence` config was not set. This patch makes it so we do
the filtering early.
A consequence of filtering out divergence-causing commits earlier is
that we rebase commits in slightly different order, which has some
impact on tests.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10249
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Mar 2021 10:34:16 -0700] rev 46833
rebase: clarify names of variables and function related to obsolete revisions
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10248
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:05:02 -0800] rev 46832
rebase: calculate obsolescense-related info earlier
My goal is to use `rewriteutil.precheck()` in the rebase code. Since
rebase does its own handling of divergent commits (it skips them
instead of erroring out), we need to have divergence-causing commits
filtered out early. This patch helps prepare for that.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10247
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:19:33 -0800] rev 46831
rebase: let _handleskippingobsolete(self) read directly from self
The function already has `self` as an argument, so there's no need to
pass data from `self` into it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10246