Tue, 06 Apr 2021 15:38:33 -0700 tests: add test-remotefilelog-strip.t to demonstrate an issue with linknodes
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Tue, 06 Apr 2021 15:38:33 -0700] rev 46846
tests: add test-remotefilelog-strip.t to demonstrate an issue with linknodes ### Background Every time a commit is modified, remotefilelog updates the metadata for the file object to point to the new commit (I believe that this is different from non-remotefilelog hg, which leaves the linkrevs pointing to the obsolete commits; doing otherwise would involve changing data in the middle of revlogs). With `hg strip` (or other things that use repair.strip()), when you strip a commit that's not the tip of the revlog, there may be commits after it in revnum order that aren't descended from it and don't need to be (and shouldn't be) stripped. These are "saved" by strip in a bundle, and that bundle is reapplied after truncating the relevant revlogs. ### The problem Remotefilelog generally avoids being involved at all in strip. Currently, that includes even providing file contents to this backup bundle. This can cause the linknode to point to a changeset that is no longer in the repository. Example: ``` @ 3 df91f74b871e | | x 2 70494d7ec5ef |/ | x 1 1e423846dde0 |/ o 0 b292c1e3311f ``` Commits 1, 2, and 3 are related via obsolescence, and are description-only changes. The linknode for the file in these commits changed each time we updated the description, so it's currently df91f7. If I strip commits 1 and 3, however, the linknode *remains* df91f7, which no longer exists in the repository. Commit 70494d was "saved", stripped, and then reapplied, so it is in the repository (as revision 1 instead of 2 now), and was unobsoleted since the obsmarker was stripped as well. The linknode for the file should point to 70494d, the most recent commit that is in the repository that modified the file. Remotefilelog has some logic to handle broken linknodes, but it can be slow. We have actually disabled it internally because it's too slow for our purposes. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10319
Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:19:52 +0200 mergestate: remove unused import
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:19:52 +0200] rev 46845
mergestate: remove unused import Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10291
Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:54:36 -0700 deb: avoid use of [[ in 'rules' file
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Tue, 30 Mar 2021 15:54:36 -0700] rev 46844
deb: avoid use of [[ in 'rules' file It's not supported by posix shell, and apparently my build system uses that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10292
Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:32:30 +0200 refactor: prefer checks against nullrev over nullid
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:32:30 +0200] rev 46843
refactor: prefer checks against nullrev over nullid A common pattern is using a changeset context and obtaining the node to compare against nullid. Change this to obtain the nullrev instead. In the future, the nullid becomes a property of the repository and is no longer a global constant, so using nullrev is much easier to reason about. Python function call overhead makes the difference moot, but future changes will result in more dictionary lookups otherwise, so prefer the simpler pattern. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10290
Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:33:12 +0200 refactor: prefer lookup by revision, even for null
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Tue, 30 Mar 2021 02:33:12 +0200] rev 46842
refactor: prefer lookup by revision, even for null While the nullid lookup is a special case, it is still more complicated. The common pattern is to lookup via nullrev so be consistent here. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10280
Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:35:54 +0200 setdiscovery: simplify by using tiprev directly
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Mon, 29 Mar 2021 01:35:54 +0200] rev 46841
setdiscovery: simplify by using tiprev directly tip() uses tiprev() and reads the node from it, so drop a layer of indirection. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10289
Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:50:37 +0200 test: enforce master to be the default branch in test
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 28 Mar 2021 19:50:37 +0200] rev 46840
test: enforce master to be the default branch in test Newer git issue a message about this. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10281
Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:53:39 +0200 fix: merge imports
Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@bec.de> [Sun, 28 Mar 2021 21:53:39 +0200] rev 46839
fix: merge imports Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10277
Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:23:05 -0800 tests: update divergence test for `hg fix` to actually result in divergence
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 11 Feb 2021 21:23:05 -0800] rev 46838
tests: update divergence test for `hg fix` to actually result in divergence We have a test that checks that `hg fix` errors out if it might cause divergence. However, the test simply prunes the commit it then tries to fix, so fixing it wouldn't actually cause divergence. That works because the implementation is simple enough that it doesn't notice the difference. I'm about to make the implementation smarter, so let's fix the test first. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10267
Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:48:27 -0700 rebase: don't call rewriteutil.precheck() with to-be-skipped commits
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:48:27 -0700] rev 46837
rebase: don't call rewriteutil.precheck() with to-be-skipped commits It's clearly incorrect to call `rewriteutil.precheck()` for commits that we're not about to rewrite. We haven't noticed yet because the function doesn't check for divergence, but I'm about to teach it to do that. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10259
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip