Sat, 16 Nov 2013 15:36:50 -0500 pull: fix post-pull common computation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 16 Nov 2013 15:36:50 -0500] rev 20220
pull: fix post-pull common computation Before that changes, pulled revision that happend to be already known locally (so, not actually added) was not taken into account when computing the new common set between local and remote. It appears that we already know the heads of the pulled set. It is in the `rheads` variable, so we are just using it and everything is works fine. We are dropping the, now useless, computation of `added` set in the process.
Mon, 25 Nov 2013 22:00:46 +0100 run-tests: better check for python version
Simon Heimberg <simohe@besonet.ch> [Mon, 25 Nov 2013 22:00:46 +0100] rev 20219
run-tests: better check for python version Compare version by using pythons tuple comparison. So we do not match on python 3.0 or newer.
Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:14:31 +0100 templatekw: allow tagtypes other than global in getlatesttags
Andrew Shadura <andrew@shadura.me> [Mon, 23 Dec 2013 14:14:31 +0100] rev 20218
templatekw: allow tagtypes other than global in getlatesttags hg-git uses tagtype 'git', for example, so it's better to check for tagtype != 'local', not strictly for 'global'
Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:58:27 -0800 revlog: move file writing to a separate function
Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> [Tue, 26 Nov 2013 12:58:27 -0800] rev 20217
revlog: move file writing to a separate function Moves the code that actually writes to a file to a separate function in revlog.py. This allows extensions to intercept and use the data being written to disk. For example, an extension might want to replicate these writes elsewhere. When cloning the Mercurial repo on /dev/shm with --pull, I see about a 0.3% perf change. It goes from 28.2 to 28.3 seconds.
Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:33:39 -0600 discovery: prefer loop to double-for list comprehension in changegroupsubset
Kevin Bullock <kbullock@ringworld.org> [Sun, 24 Nov 2013 17:33:39 -0600] rev 20216
discovery: prefer loop to double-for list comprehension in changegroupsubset The double-for form of list comprehensions gets particularly unreadable when you throw in an 'if' condition. This expands the only remaining instance of the double-for syntax in our codebase into a loop.
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:32:51 -0600 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:32:51 -0600] rev 20215
merge with stable
Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:56:30 -0600 merge with stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:56:30 -0600] rev 20214
merge with stable
Wed, 01 Jan 2014 21:46:45 -0600 Added signature for changeset ca387377df7a stable
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Wed, 01 Jan 2014 21:46:45 -0600] rev 20213
Added signature for changeset ca387377df7a
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -8 +8 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip