Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 14:32:03 -0700] rev 21444
run-tests: record warnings by raising WarnTest
We continue the conversion of recording test results by raising
exceptions.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 14:28:29 -0700] rev 21443
run-tests: record ignored tests by raising IgnoreTest
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 14:23:50 -0700] rev 21442
run-tests: record skips by raising SkipTest
The unittest way of recording a skipped test is to raise an exception
(at least with modern unittest implementation). We change Test to raise
a SkipTest when operating in unittest mode.
This does prevent some "tear down" activities from running in unittest
mode. This will be fixed in subsequent patches. Since unittest mode
is experimental, this should be OK.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 14:19:59 -0700] rev 21441
run-tests: implement TestCase.run()
Simply wrapping TestCase.run() is not sufficient for robust results
reporting because unittest in Python 2.4 does not know about things
like skipped tests and reports them as success or failures instead of
skips.
We will reimplement TestCase.run() with knowledge and semantics present
in modern Python releases.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 14:04:37 -0700] rev 21440
run-tests: don't print progress from Test when in unittest mode
unittest does its own printing of progress indicators as part of
TestResult. So, there is no need to print them when running in unittest
mode.
This will fix the double output of progress indicators that had been
occurring in unittest mode.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 13:04:19 -0700] rev 21439
run-tests: define a custom TestSuite that uses _executetests()
We now have a custom unittest.TestSuite implementation that uses
_executetests() and thus knows how to execute tests concurrently.
Running tests in --unittest mode will use this TestSuite.
Since the TestSuite handles concurrency, the warnings around --jobs and
--loop have been removed.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 13:00:40 -0700] rev 21438
run-tests: pass an optional TestResult into _executetests()
If the result is passed, we execute tests in the unittest way. A
subsequent patch will actually do this.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:49:43 -0700] rev 21437
run-tests: pass Test instances into TestRunner._executetests()
Test instances (not paths) are passed into _executetests(). This means
the logic for instantiating Test instances has been moved outside of
_executetests(). This was done because an upcoming patch will reuse the
logic in _executetests().
As part of this change, test counts are no longer managed by
_executetests().
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 17 May 2014 12:35:44 -0700] rev 21436
run-tests: define cleanup() on unittest class
We need a cleanup() on our unittest TestCase class to conform with the
execution API. This will eventually be replaced by tearDown().
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:45:44 -0700] rev 21435
run-tests: rename Test._test to Test.name
A lot of the attributes in Test could probably be renamed. This one is
needed for an upcoming patch.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 12:19:48 -0700] rev 21434
run-tests: teach Test instances whether they are in unittest mode
Tests executing in unittest mode behave a little differently. For
example, they report their results to a TestResult rather than just
printing. This patch paves the way for better integration of Test into
the unittest framework.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:55:02 -0700] rev 21433
run-tests: teach unittest about warned results
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:52:41 -0700] rev 21432
run-tests: document how success code is handled
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:51:11 -0700] rev 21431
run-tests: teach unittest about ignored tests
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:48:19 -0700] rev 21430
run-tests: teach unittest about skipped tests
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:47:40 -0700] rev 21429
run-tests: define custom result and runner classes for unittest
We need to teach unittest about some custom result types. This will
require some custom classes. This patch creates a skeleton for them.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:29:39 -0700] rev 21428
run-tests: start to report test results against TestResult
Previously, our unittest wrapper didn't report results properly. We now
properly report failures.
We had to rename the local variable to prevent "t" from being
overwritten in the local scope.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:24:37 -0700] rev 21427
run-tests: give unittest wrapper a short description
This will make the output contain something useful rather than the
default repr() for the class.
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sun, 20 Apr 2014 11:22:08 -0700] rev 21426
run-tests: initial support for running tests with unittest
The unittest package in Python's standard library provides an almost
universal mechanism for defining and running tests. This patch starts
the process of making run-tests.py talk to it.
The main benefit of speaking unittest is that this will enable
Mercurial's tests to be more easily consumed by other testing tools,
like nose. This is useful for 3rd party extensions having their own
test infrastructure, for example.
Running tests in unittest mode will not result in completely sane
behavior until the unittest mode is made the default execution mode.
Expect things like double printing of output until support stabilizes.
Sean Farley <sean.michael.farley@gmail.com> [Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:34:48 -0500] rev 21425
localrepo: reverse contexts in status
This is a slight tweak to how localrepo.status calculates what files have
changed. By forcing a changectx to be first operator and anything not a
changectx to be the second operator, we can later exploit this to allow
refactoring the status operation as a method of a context object.
Furthermore, this change will speed up 'hg diff --reverse' when used with the
working directory because the code will now hit a fast path without needing to
calculate an unneeded second manifest.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 16 May 2014 13:18:57 -0700] rev 21424
test: split test-largefile.t in multiple file
The `test-largefiles.t` unified test is significantly longer (about 30%) than
any other tests in the mercurial test suite. As a result, its is alway the last
test my test runner is waiting for at the end of a run.
In practice, this means that `test-largefile.t` is wasting half a minute of my
life every times I'm running the mercurial test suites. This probably mean more
a few cumulated day by now.
I've finally decided to split it up in multiple smaller tests to bring it back in
reasonable length.
This changeset extracts independent test cases in two files. One dedicated to
wire protocole testing, and another one dedicated to all other tests that could
be independently extracted.
No test case were haltered in the making of this changeset.
Various timing available below. All timing have been done on a with 90 jobs on a
64 cores machine. Similar result are shown on firefly (20 jobs on 12 core).
General timing of the whole run
--------------------------------
We see a 25% real time improvement for no significant cpu time impact.
Before split:
real 2m1.149s
user 58m4.662s
sys 11m28.563s
After split:
real 1m31.977s
user 57m45.993s
sys 11m33.634s
Last test to finish (using run-test.py --time)
----------------------------------------------
test-largefile.t is now finishing at the same time than other slow tests.
Before split:
Time Test
119.280 test-largefiles.t
93.995 test-mq.t
89.897 test-subrepo.t
86.920 test-glog.t
85.508 test-rename-merge2.t
83.594 test-revset.t
79.824 test-keyword.t
78.077 test-mq-header-date.t
After split:
Time Test
90.414 test-mq.t
88.594 test-largefiles.t
85.363 test-subrepo.t
81.059 test-glog.t
78.927 test-rename-merge2.t
78.021 test-revset.t
77.777 test-command-template.t
Timing of largefile test themself
-----------------------------------
Running only tests prefixed with "test-largefiles".
No significant change in cumulated time.
Before:
Time Test
58.673 test-largefiles.t
2.931 test-largefiles-cache.t
0.583 test-largefiles-small-disk.t
After:
Time Test
31.754 test-largefiles.t
17.460 test-largefiles-misc.t
8.888 test-largefiles-wireproto.t
2.864 test-largefiles-cache.t
0.580 test-largefiles-small-disk.t
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21423
mq: use the editor gotten by "getcommiteditor()" instead of "ui.edit()" (qrefresh/qfold)
This patch also replaces "editor = False" by "editor =
cmdutil.getcommiteditor()", because:
- it allows to hook commit message determination easily, even in the
case without "--edit"
- it avoids regression (or additional care) around saving
"last-message.txt", even if MQ's "newcommit()" changes its
implementation logic from "localrepository.commit" to
"localrepository.commitctx" with "memctx" in the future
to save commit message into "last-messge.txt" with "memctx",
"editor" should be valid function.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21422
mq: fold the code paths to invoke editor into specific logic (qrefresh/qfold)
This factoring simplifies the succeeding patch to switch from
"ui.edit()" to "getcommiteditor()" for qrefresh/qfold.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21421
mq: use the editor gotten by "getcommiteditor()" instead of "ui.edit()" (qnew)
This patch also replaces "editor = False" by "editor =
cmdutil.getcommiteditor()", because:
- the latter allows to hook commit message determination easily,
even in the case without "--edit"
- the latter can avoid regression (or additional care) around saving
"last-message.txt", even if MQ's "newcommit()" changes its
implementation logic from "localrepository.commit" to
"localrepository.commitctx" with "memctx" in the future
to save commit message into "last-messge.txt" with "memctx",
"editor" should be valid function.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21420
mq: fold the code path to invoke editor into specific logic (qnew)
This factoring simplifies the succeeding patch to switch from
"ui.edit()" to "getcommiteditor()" for qnew.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21419
cmdutil: enhance "getcommiteditor()" for specific usages in MQ
This patch introduces "finishdesc" and "extramsg" arguments into
"getcommiteditor()" for specific usages in MQ.
"finishdesc" will be used to treat the commit message as "[mq];
patch-file-name" (default MQ commit message), if it is left as empty,
instead of aborting commit process.
"extramsg" will be used to show the line below:
HG: Leave message empty to use default message
instead of:
HG: Leave message empty to abort commit
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21418
tag: use the editor gotten by "getcommiteditor()" instead of "ui.edit()"
This patch also enhances "test-tag.t", because "hg tag" hasn't been
explicitly tested around editor invocation and "--edit" option.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21417
import: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice
This patch also enhances "test-import-bypass.t" and "test-import.t",
because "hg import" hasn't been explicitly tested around editor
invocation and "--edit" option.
This patch explicitly tests below:
- with "--bypass" (regardless of "--edit"):
- not invoked, if the patch contains the commit message
- not invoked, if the commit message is explicitly specified
- invoked, otherwise (just adding comment)
- without "--bypass":
- with "--edit":
- not invoked, if "--no-commit" is not specified
- invoked, otherwise
- without "--edit":
- not invoked, if the patch contains the commit message
- not invoked, if "--message" or "--logfile" is specified
(just adding comment)
- invoked, otherwise
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21416
graft: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice
This patch also enhances "test-graft.t", because "hg graft" hasn't
been explicitly tested around editor invocation and "--edit" option.
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 11 May 2014 00:49:36 +0900] rev 21415
amend: use "getcommiteditor()" instead of explicit editor choice
This patch doesn't change any tests like as preceding patches, because
editor invocation is already tested in "test-commit-amend.t".