Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:03:58 +0530] rev 36380
py3: add b'' prefixes in test-alias.t
# skip-blame as it's just b'' prefixes
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:26:45 +0530] rev 36379
py3: add b'' prefixes in test-revset.t
# skip-blame because it's just b''
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:25:51 +0530] rev 36378
py3: make sure we use bytes in generate-working-copy-states.py
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:15:36 +0530] rev 36377
py3: fix keyword arguments handling in hgext/acl.py
# skip-blame because we added r'' prefixes
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 23 Feb 2018 17:14:25 +0530] rev 36376
py3: use pycompat.bytestr to convert str returned by getpass.getuser to bytes
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:57:17 +0530] rev 36375
py3: add b'' prefixes in test-abort-checkin.t
# skip-blame because we just added a b'' prefix.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Feb 2018 23:43:23 +0530] rev 36374
py3: add b'' prefixes in test-dispatch.py
# skip-blame because this is just adding b'' prefixes
Augie Fackler <augie@google.com> [Thu, 22 Feb 2018 20:04:42 -0500] rev 36373
cleanup: say goodbye to manifestv2 format
This experiment was a bust: we'd hoped for smaller repository sizes,
but things got larger. Google ended up rolling out tree manifests in a
format that's compatible with the original manifest format, and I
believe Facebook is doing the same. This code was never implemented as
native speedups, so I'm pretty comfortable saying nobody is using the
experimental feature. Let's rip it out.
I noticed this code still kicking around because I was investigating a
repo corruption issue for timeless.
.. bc::
Support for the experimental manifestv2 format has been removed, as
it was never completed and failed to meet expectations.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2393
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:47:39 -0800] rev 36372
wireproto: document the wonky push protocol for SSH
It took me several minutes to figure out how the "unbundle"
protocol worked. It turns out that the SSH protocol handler
sends an empty reply that is interpreted as "OK to send" and
only then does the client send the bundle payload.
On top of that, the response is different depending on whether
the operation was successful or not. I nearly pulled out my hair
deciphering this.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2385
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:21:05 -0800] rev 36371
wireprototypes: move baseprotocolhandler from wireprotoserver
This is needed to prevent a cycle in an upcoming commit.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2384
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Feb 2018 14:02:23 -0800] rev 36370
sshpeer: defer pipe buffering and stderr sidechannel binding
The doublepipe and bufferedinputpipe types facilitate polling
multiple pipes without blocking and for automatically forwarding
output from the SSH server's stderr pipe to the ui as "remote: "
output. This all happens automatically and callers don't need
to worry about reading from multiple pipes.
An upcoming change to version 2 of the SSH wire protocol will
eliminate the use of stderr and move side-channel output into
the "main" pipe. The SSH wire protocol will use a pair of
unidirectional pipes - just like the HTTP protocol. In this
future world, the doublepipe primitive isn't necessary because
the stderr pipe won't be used.
To prepare for eventually not using doublepipe, we delay the
construction of this primitive from immediately after
connection establishment to inside construction of the peer
instance. The handshake occurs between these two events. So
we had to teach the handshake code to read from stderr so
any stderr output from the server is still attended to early in
the connection lifetime.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2383
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Feb 2018 13:08:55 -0800] rev 36369
sshpeer: make pipe polling code more explicit
"hasbuffer" is a property on our special bufferedinputpipe class.
When reading this code, I thought it might have had something
special to do properties on built-in types. But "hasbuffer" doesn't
appear in the CPython code base for either 2.7 or 3.7, so the
answer is no.
Let's make the code more explicit about the fact that it deals with
our special bufferedinputpipe type.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2382