Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:19:23 +0100 peer: store the path object used to build a peer from a repo
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:19:23 +0100] rev 49755
peer: store the path object used to build a peer from a repo This is the simplest case, we so starts with it.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:41:44 +0100 peer: build a `path` object on the fly when needed
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 17:41:44 +0100] rev 49754
peer: build a `path` object on the fly when needed So now, we always have a `path` object around when building the peer
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:16:07 +0100 peer: have `repo.peer` take an optional `path` argument
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:16:07 +0100] rev 49753
peer: have `repo.peer` take an optional `path` argument We are ready to start to actually set the value now.
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:13:50 +0100 peer: add a `path` attribute to peer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:13:50 +0100] rev 49752
peer: add a `path` attribute to peer It will start being set in the coming changesets.
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:00:41 +0100 peer: have a common constructor and use it
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 00:00:41 +0100] rev 49751
peer: have a common constructor and use it For now it does not do much, but we will extend it to also store a path object soon.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:04:51 +0100 peer: use a dedicated name for the `peer` constructor
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:04:51 +0100] rev 49750
peer: use a dedicated name for the `peer` constructor We want to change the argument it takes, so we rather make them different function.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:04:37 +0100 peer: dissolve `_peerlookup` into its last two callers
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 18:04:37 +0100] rev 49749
peer: dissolve `_peerlookup` into its last two callers This is about to need more changes and the function won't be useful. We do it early to clarify later changes.
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:45 +0100 peer: stop having a `peer()` method on `peer()`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:45 +0100] rev 49748
peer: stop having a `peer()` method on `peer()` This is already a peer, why do you want a peer if you already have one.
Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:39 +0100 clone: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 03 Dec 2022 03:45:39 +0100] rev 49747
clone: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer Instead of having `peer()` method on all `peer()` for this usecase, we could simply handle it explicitly.
Fri, 02 Dec 2022 19:15:04 +0100 addbranchrevs: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 02 Dec 2022 19:15:04 +0100] rev 49746
addbranchrevs: explicitly detect the need to fetch a peer Instead of having `peer()` method on all `peer()` for this usecase, we could simply handle it explicitly.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip