Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:58:52 +0100 https: warn when server certificate isn't verified stable
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:58:52 +0100] rev 13163
https: warn when server certificate isn't verified Mercurial will verify HTTPS server certificates if web.cacerts is configured, but it will by default silently not verify any certificates. We now warn the user that when the certificate isn't verified she won't get the security she might expect from https: warning: localhost certificate not verified (check web.cacerts config setting) Self-signed certificates can be accepted silently by configuring web.cacerts to point to a suitable certificate file.
Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:46:31 -0500 merge: document some internal return values.
Greg Ward <greg-hg@gerg.ca> [Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:46:31 -0500] rev 13162
merge: document some internal return values.
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:37 -0600 check-code: catch os.path.relpath
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:37 -0600] rev 13161
check-code: catch os.path.relpath
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:36 -0600 check-code: catch "except as"
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:36 -0600] rev 13160
check-code: catch "except as"
Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:27 -0600 tests: eliminate fast-forward merge in test-tag
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> [Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:27 -0600] rev 13159
tests: eliminate fast-forward merge in test-tag
Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:29:21 +0100 merge: fast-forward merge with descendant
Mads Kiilerich <mads@kiilerich.com> [Tue, 07 Dec 2010 03:29:21 +0100] rev 13158
merge: fast-forward merge with descendant issue2538 gives a case where a changeset is merged with its child (which is on another branch), and to my surprise the result is a real merge with two parents, not just a "fast forward" "merge" with only the child as parent. That is essentially the same as issue619. Is the existing behaviour as intended and correct? Or is the following fix correct? Some extra "created new head" pops up with this fix, but it seems to me like they could be considered correct. The old branch head has been superseeded by changes on the other branch, and when the changes on the other branch is merged back to the branch it will introduce a new head not directly related to the previous branch head. (I guess the intention with existing behaviour could be to ensure that the changesets on the branch are directly connected and that no new heads pops up on merges.)
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:14:18 -0600 record: teach parsepatch() about non-git style headers
Steve Borho <steve@borho.org> [Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:14:18 -0600] rev 13157
record: teach parsepatch() about non-git style headers These changes are not useful to record itself, since it is hard coded to always generate git style diffs. But it makes parsepatch() more generally useful for parsing normal patch files.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip