Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 16 Oct 2014 23:15:35 -0700] rev 23166
revset-matching: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in
the repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet'
class for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefits of the fullreposet but it is less visible
because the matching process itself is very expensive:
revset) matching(100)
before) wall 6.413281 comb 6.420000 user 5.910000 sys 0.510000 (best of 3)
after) wall 6.173608 comb 6.170000 user 5.750000 sys 0.420000 (best of 3)
However for some complex list, this provide a massive speedup
revset) matching(parents(100))
before) wall 23.890740 comb 23.890000 user 23.450000 sys 0.440000 (best of 3)
after) wall 6.382280 comb 6.390000 user 5.930000 sys 0.460000 (best of 3)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 16 Oct 2014 23:15:06 -0700] rev 23165
revset-parentspec: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in
the repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet'
class for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefits of the fullreposet:
revset) 100^1
before) wall 0.002694 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 897)
after) wall 0.000997 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2324)
revset) parents(100)^1
before) wall 0.003832 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 587)
after) wall 0.001034 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2309)
revset) (100^1)^1
before) wall 0.005616 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 405)
after) wall 0.001030 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2258)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 16 Oct 2014 23:14:17 -0700] rev 23164
revset-children: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in the
repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet' class
for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefits of the fullreposet:
revset) children(tip~100)
before) wall 0.007469 comb 0.010000 user 0.010000 sys 0.000000 (best of 338)
after) wall 0.003356 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 755)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 16 Oct 2014 23:11:25 -0700] rev 23163
revset-ancestorspec: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in
the repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet'
class for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefits of the fullreposet:
revset) 100~5
before) wall 0.002712 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 918)
after) wall 0.000996 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2493)
revset) parents(100)~5
before) wall 0.003812 comb 0.010000 user 0.010000 sys 0.000000 (best of 667)
after) wall 0.001038 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2361)
revset) (100~5)~5
before) wall 0.005614 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 446)
after) wall 0.001035 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 2424)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Thu, 16 Oct 2014 23:10:44 -0700] rev 23162
revset-rangeset: call 'getset' on a 'fullreposet'
Calling 'baseset(repo.changelog)' builds a list for all revisions in
the repo. And we already have the lazy and efficient 'fullreposet'
class for this purpose.
This gives us the usual benefit ofs the fullreposet:
revset) 10:100
before) wall 0.002774 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 797)
after) wall 0.001977 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 1244)
revset) parents(10):parents(100)
before) wall 0.005054 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 481)
after) wall 0.002060 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 1056)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sun, 19 Oct 2014 22:19:22 -0700] rev 23161
test-revert: make sure all 'tracked' files are really tracked
When a file is missing in the 'parent' version and is tracked but
missing in the working directory, which happens by the 'missing' or
'removed' types, and the 'clean' type in the working directory, the
file does not exist in the working directory (unlike it would had the
'deleted' type been used). Thus, the *_missing_missing_tracked are not
actually tracked and they end up testing the same state as
*_missing_missing_untracked. To make them tracked, add a temporary
file, just like we do for the delete case. For simplicity's sake,
let's make sure the gen-revert-cases.py script always puts a file in
the working directory, whether or not it's going to be deleted.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sat, 18 Oct 2014 18:12:54 -0700] rev 23160
test-revert: sort by output filename again
Future patches will change how the output of 'gen-revert-cases.py
filelist' is generated, so now we want the order to depend on just the
filename again.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 20 Oct 2014 22:54:18 -0700] rev 23159
test-revert: name files by state, not by state transition
This is the main patch in a series. See motivation in earlier patch.
In this patch, we actually change the names of the generated
files. For example, the file that is currently called missing_clean
becomes missing_missing_missing-tracked and it's clearer that it
should be tracked. It turns out that since the state was not
previously clear, it ended up testing an untracked state, which was
the same as for missing_clean. We'll fix this in a later patch.
Let's also change the content from (base,parent,wc) to
(content1,content2,content3) to make them all the same length so they
line up when displayed.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 17 Oct 2014 06:27:43 -0700] rev 23158
test-revert: temporarily sort by input states instead of output filename
The next patch will change the names of the files produced by the
script in test-revert. In order to reduce the size and increase the
clarity of the next patch, make the order produced by the internal
'gen-revert-cases.py filelist' command independent of the filenames.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Sat, 18 Oct 2014 22:23:19 -0700] rev 23157
test-revert: put content, not keys, into 'combination'
By putting the file content rather than keys in the 'combination'
list, we restrict the knowledge of 'ctxcontent' and 'wccontent' to the
loop generating the combinations. That will make it easier to replace
the generation code.