Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:10:46 +0800 gpg: getkeys() removes unused returning value "err"
Wei, Elson <elson.wei@gmail.com> [Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:10:46 +0800] rev 19442
gpg: getkeys() removes unused returning value "err"
Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:05:11 +0800 gpg: treat "ERRSIG" as a valid key id but no fingerprint
Wei, Elson <elson.wei@gmail.com> [Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:05:11 +0800] rev 19441
gpg: treat "ERRSIG" as a valid key id but no fingerprint
Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:11:41 -0400 commit: enable --secret option
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <jordigh@octave.org> [Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:11:41 -0400] rev 19440
commit: enable --secret option At the moment, creating secret commits is slightly cumbersome. They can either be created by changing the default commit phase to secret or by doing `hg phase --secret --force`. Both of these make secret commits appear to be like some kind of advanced feature. Secret commits, however, should be a convenient feature for people who want to work on a private branch without affecting anyone else. There should therefore be a prominent and convenient method for creating secret commits. Since the default phase is draft and there is no need to use --force to go from a secret phase to any other phase, this patch intentionally does not add --draft and --public options.
Wed, 17 Jul 2013 23:58:04 +0200 merge: deprecate the --force option
Florence Laguzet <florence.laguzet@gmail.com> [Wed, 17 Jul 2013 23:58:04 +0200] rev 19439
merge: deprecate the --force option The --force option in merge does not make what people think it does so it may not be visible to everyone. I have local changes and want to pull one's changes which made 2 heads. The --force option in help says -f --force force a merge with outstanding changes so I can expect that I can use it to force the merge and commit it in my local repository without taking my local changes into account. But merging with -f keeps local changes and "add" them: they must be committed or reverted before doing the merge commit. The merge -f cannot be reverted so it leads my repository in a bad state: cannot commit merge and don't want to revert/commit local changes yet. Message in help have been updated to emphasize the fact that local changes are included in the merge.
Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:42:44 -0700 run-tests: revert previous commit, run() waits after a timeout
Brendan Cully <brendan@kublai.com> [Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:42:44 -0700] rev 19438
run-tests: revert previous commit, run() waits after a timeout
Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:39:01 -0700 run-tests: reap timed-out zombies
Brendan Cully <brendan@kublai.com> [Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:39:01 -0700] rev 19437
run-tests: reap timed-out zombies
Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:58:48 +0400 hgweb: run search instead of showing wrong error for ambigious identifier
Alexander Plavin <me@aplavin.ru> [Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:58:48 +0400] rev 19436
hgweb: run search instead of showing wrong error for ambigious identifier Before this when multiple changesets hashes in the repos started with the search query string, error was given that the revision isn't found, and it was misleading. Now a simple keyword search runs in this case.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip