Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:49:37 -0400] rev 39510
extensions: trace the total time of running all reposetup callbacks
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4512
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:21:42 -0400] rev 39509
extensions: trace the total time of running all extsetup callbacks
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4511
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Thu, 06 Sep 2018 16:20:05 -0400] rev 39508
extensions: trace the total time of running all uisetup callbacks
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4510
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:36:25 -0700] rev 39507
extensions: add timing for extensions reposetup
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4509
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 07 Sep 2018 11:18:45 -0400] rev 39506
sparse-revlog: set max delta chain length to on thousand
The new snapshot system used in the sparse-revlog case gave us some small size
benefit so far. However its most important property is to gracefully handle
harder limit on delta chainlength.
Long delta chain has a very detrimental impact on read (and write) performance
in revlog. Being able to shorter them provide a great boost. However, shorting
delta used to result significantly lower compression ratio. The intermediate
snapshots effectively suppress most of this effect (even all in some case).
# Effect on the test repository
The repository we use for test is not "realistic" but can still show this in
action using an unreasonably low chain limit. Limiting the chain length show a
sizeable increase but stay under control: +6% for limit=15; +15% for limit=10.
Without the snapshot system the increase is significantly bigger: +45% for
limit=15; +80% for limit=10. Even slightly larger than without delta chain
limit, the resulting size is still smaller than before we started doing
snapshots.
Here is a table for comparison. *Since the repository is not branchy, the
initial sparse-revlog version does not bring much benefit compare to the
non-sparse one):
chain length limit | none | limit=15 | limit=10 |
without sparse-revlog | 62 818 987 | 112 664 615 | 131 222 574 |
without snapshot | 74 365 490 | 108 211 410 | 133 857 764 |
with snapshot | 59 230 936 | 63 002 924 | 68 415 329 |
# Effect On Real Life Repositories
The series provides significant benefits on all kind of repositories.
Using `hg debugupgraderepo -o redeltaparent --run`, we recomputed delta chain
for various repositories with different settings:
- delta chain length: unlimited or 1000 limit
- sparse-revlog: enabled or disabled
- this series: applied or not applied
We can observe multiple types of effect:
- On very branchy repositories:
* The delta chain limit as low impact on the repo size.
* Intermediate snapshot greatly reduces manifest size:
- pypy: -80%
- netbeans: -95%
* The delta chain limit is effective, without a size impact:
- netbeans average: 613 -> 282
- private #1 average: 1 068 -> 307
- On more linear repository:
* Intermediate snapshot limit the impact of delta chain limit:
- mozilla:
without the series: +360%
with the series: +25%
* The delta chain limit provides large improvement:
- mozilla's average chain length:
unlimited: 15 338
limited: 469
* Despite the chain length limit, the manifest size is reduced:
- mercurial: -25%
- mozilla: -30%
It is clear that the use of chains of intermediate snapshots provide large
benefits both in storage size and delta chains quality. We should now switch our
effort toward making sure the write performance are acceptable. Then,
`sparse-revlog` will be a suitable format for all new repository.
# Raw Statistic
* no-sparse: general delta repository not using sparse-revlog
* no-snapshot: sparse-revlog repository not using this series
* snapshot: sparse-revlog repository using this series
mercurial
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|-------------|------------
no-sparse | 8 021 373 | 8 199 366
no-snapshot | 8 103 561 | 8 259 719
snapshot | 6 137 116 | 6 126 433
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000 ||
value || average | max || average | max ||
------------||---------|---------||---------|---------||
no-sparse || 307 | 1456 || 279 | 1000 ||
no-snapshot || 312 | 1456 || 283 | 1000 ||
snapshot || 248 | 1208 || 241 | 1000 ||
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|-------------|------------
no-sparse | 51 013 198 | 51 201 574
no-snapshot | 50 930 795 | 51 141 006
snapshot | 48 072 037 | 48 093 572
pypy
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|-------------|------------
no-sparse | 193 987 784 | 193 987 784
no-snapshot | 163 171 745 | 163 312 229
snapshot | 34 605 900 | 34 600 750
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000 ||
value || average | max || average | max ||
------------||---------|---------||---------|---------||
no-sparse || 101 | 692 || 101 | 692 ||
no-snapshot || 151 | 1307 || 148 | 1000 ||
snapshot || 128 | 1309 || 125 | 1000 ||
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|-------------|------------
no-sparse | 495 931 473 | 495 931 473
no-snapshot | 465 441 017 | 465 581 501
snapshot | 355 467 301 | 355 472 451
Mozilla
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 416 757 148 | 1 869 009 668
no-snapshot | 401 592 370 | 1 843 493 795
snapshot | 224 359 521 | 284 615 500
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000 ||
value || average | max || average | max ||
------------||---------|---------||---------|---------||
no-sparse || 15 333 | 58 980 || 468 | 1 000 ||
no-snapshot || 15 336 | 58 980 || 469 | 1 000 ||
snapshot || 15 338 | 58 983 || 469 | 1 000 ||
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 2 712 477 887 | 4 164 995 451
no-snapshot | 2 698 887 835 | 4 141 054 304
snapshot | 2 518 130 385 | 2 578 587 596
Netbeans
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 4 766 794 101 | 4 870 642 687
no-snapshot | 4 334 806 082 | 4 428 681 309
snapshot | 232 659 666 | 240 330 665
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000 ||
value || average | max || average | max ||
------------||---------|---------||---------|---------||
no-sparse || 597 | 6802 || 254 | 1 000 ||
no-snapshot || 648 | 6 802 || 305 | 1 000 ||
snapshot || 613 | 6 804 || 282 | 1 000 ||
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 5 807 347 998 | 5 911 196 584
no-snapshot | 5 375 398 602 | 5 469 273 829
snapshot | 1 282 519 928 | 1 290 190 927
Private repo #1
Manifest Size:
limit | none | 1000
------------|-----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 41 389 010 840 | 41 398 162 091
no-snapshot | 9 737 319 435 | 10 223 773 150
snapshot | 744 215 807 | 747 961 822
Manifest Chain length data
limit || none || 1000 ||
value || average | max || average | max ||
------------||---------|---------||---------|---------||
no-sparse || 245 | 8 885 || 81 | 1 000 ||
no-snapshot || 1 225 | 8 885 || 336 | 1 000 ||
snapshot || 1 068 | 7 909 || 307 | 1 000 ||
Full Store Size
limit | none | 1000
------------|----------------|---------------
no-sparse | 49 646 065 126 | 49 655 216 377
no-snapshot | 17 924 862 856 | 18 411 316 571
snapshot | 9 009 024 710 | 9 012 770 725
Private repo #2
We currently have less data available for that repository.
* Before is a sparse-revlog repository without this series
* After is a sparse-revlog repository with this series + 1000 chain limit
Manifest Size:
Before: 1 531 485 040 bytes
After: 1 091 422 451 bytes
Manifest Chain:
Before: 2 218 avg; 6 575 Max
After: 442 avg; 1 000 Max
Full Store Size
Before: 15 203 955 615
after: 8 207 180 693
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 07 Sep 2018 11:18:45 -0400] rev 39505
snapshot: also consider the snapshot chain of one unrelated revision
To maximize the chance of good delta chain reuse, we inject an unrelated delta
chain into our search. To do so, we search for the highest revision unrelated
to the parents of the current revision and use its snapshot chain too.
Adding this extra snapshot into the mix can have a performance impact. We'll
deal with performance impact in a later series.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 07 Sep 2018 11:17:37 -0400] rev 39504
snapshot: extract parent chain computation
The final step of this series is to include chain related to "prev" in the
search. Before adding that code we do some simple code movement to clarify the
next diff.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 07 Sep 2018 11:17:36 -0400] rev 39503
snapshot: refine candidate snapshot base upward
Once we found a suitable snapshot base it is useful to check if it has a
"children" snapshot that would provide a better diff. This is useful when base
not directly related to stored revision are picked. In those case, we "jumped"
to this new chain at an arbitrary point, checking if a higher point is more
appropriate will help to provide better results and increase snapshot reuse.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 07 Sep 2018 11:17:35 -0400] rev 39502
snapshot: try to refine new snapshot base down the chain
There are cases where doing a diff against a snapshot's parent will be shorter
than against the snapshot itself. Reusing snapshot not directly related to the
revision we are trying to store increase this odd.
So once we found a possible candidate, we check the snapshots lower in the
chain.
This will involve extra processing, but this extra processing will only happen
when we are doing building a snapshot, a rare situation.
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 07 Sep 2018 11:17:34 -0400] rev 39501
snapshot: make sure we'll never refine delta base from a reused source
The point of reusing delta from the source is to avoid doing computation when
applying a bundle. Refining such delta would go against that spirit.
We do not have refining logic in place yet. This code needed to be moved out
of the way before we could start adding such logic.