Sun, 08 Apr 2018 15:41:40 +0900 py3: drop b'' from error message of fancyopts
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sun, 08 Apr 2018 15:41:40 +0900] rev 37465
py3: drop b'' from error message of fancyopts
Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:26:37 +0900 procutil: drop unused 'newlines' option from popen*() (API)
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:26:37 +0900] rev 37464
procutil: drop unused 'newlines' option from popen*() (API) It's unlikely for us to use the universal_newlines option.
Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:23:42 +0900 procutil: make explainexit() simply return a message (API)
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:23:42 +0900] rev 37463
procutil: make explainexit() simply return a message (API) Almost all callers want it.
Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:21:03 +0900 procutil: do not convert return code of signal exit to positive number (API)
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:21:03 +0900] rev 37462
procutil: do not convert return code of signal exit to positive number (API) The docstring states that "codes from kill are negative", and it doesn't make sense to make exit/signal code ambiguous. .. api:: ``hook.hook()`` and ``hook.runhooks()`` may return a negative integer to denote that the process was killed by signal.
Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:17:50 +0900 procutil: fix error message of tempfile filter
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:17:50 +0900] rev 37461
procutil: fix error message of tempfile filter First, we need to use procutil.system() to get an exit code compatible with explainexit(). Second, explainexit() returns (msg, code) tuple.
Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:14:16 +0900 procutil: unify platform.explainexit()
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Sat, 07 Apr 2018 21:14:16 +0900] rev 37460
procutil: unify platform.explainexit() Since 4368f582c806 "use subprocess instead of os.system", posix.explainexit() is the superset of Windows implementation.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip