copies-rust: fix reverted argument when merging tiny minor or major The argument where not passed in the right other. This is not caught by the test (yet) because it is a sub case of a special case. Am I adding this to my list of things to test. Using test directly in Rust would be appropriate here. However we don't have the ability to test this code that way yet, and I am focussing on other part of that work right now. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9657

copies-rust: rename TimeStampedPathCopy to CopySource Same rational as the previous changesets. CopySource is a clear descriptive name that does not depends on an implementation details that we are about to the change. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9642

copies-rust: rename TimeStampedPathCopies to InternalPathCopies We are looking into moving away from TimeStampedPathCopy (that use is_ancestors call to detect overwrite) in favor of an approach that does not requires is_ancestors calls. Yet we will still need an internal representation that differs from the returned result. So we call it "InternalPathCopies" which is generic but clear. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9641

copies: detect case when a merge decision overwrite previous data We now detect and record when a merge case required special logic (eg: thing that append during the merge, ambiguity leading to picking p1 data, etc) and we explicitly mark the result as superseding the previous data. This fixes the family of test we previously added. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9613

copies: rearrange all value comparison conditional To properly handle the newly tested case (chaining of merges) we will need to detect more accurately when an actualy merging of the copy information (and superseed the two existing data). Before starting to do so, we need to reorganise the values comparison to introduce different conditional branches when such actual merging is needed/detected. To avoid mixing too many change in this complicated code, we do the reorganisation before adding the "overwrite detection" logic in the next changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9612

test-copies: introduce merge chains test for the P/Q merges This is similar to the chaining test we have for the A/E merges. The current result of this tests is wrong, as for the other test of the same familly. This will be fixed by a later changesets. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10059

test-copies: add a case involving the `b` and a new `r` branch That case involve a branch overwriting copies information from the other one. It is similar to the `mBFm` / `mFBm` case except this case actual content merge is involved too. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D10058