rebase: make debug logging more consistent We emit some lines that mix revision numbers with nodeids, which makes little sense to me.

revset: fix order of nested '_(|int|hex)list' expression (BC) This fixes the order of 'x & (y + z)' where 'y' and 'z' are trivial, and the other uses of _list()-family functions. The original functions are renamed to '_ordered(|int|hex)list' to say clearly that they do not follow the subset ordering.

revset: fix order of nested 'or' expression (BC) This fixes the order of 'x & (y + z)' where 'y' and 'z' are not trivial. The follow-order 'or' operation is slower than the ordered operation if an input set is large: #0 #1 #2 #3 0) 0.002968 0.002980 0.002982 0.073042 1) 0.004513 0.004485 0.012029 0.075261 #0: 0:4000 & (0:1099 + 1000:2099 + 2000:3099) #1: 4000:0 & (0:1099 + 1000:2099 + 2000:3099) #2: 10000:0 & (0:1099 + 1000:2099 + 2000:3099) #3: file("path:hg") & (0:1099 + 1000:2099 + 2000:3099) I've tried another implementation, but which appeared to be slower than this version. ss = [getset(repo, fullreposet(repo), x) for x in xs] return subset.filter(lambda r: any(r in s for s in ss), cache=False)

revset: add 'takeorder' attribute to mark functions that need ordering flag Since most functions shouldn't need 'order' flag, it is passed only when explicitly required. This avoids large API breakage.

revset: pass around ordering flags to operations Some operations and functions will need them to fix ordering bugs.

revset: add stub to handle parentpost operation All operations will take 'order' flag, but p1() function won't.

revset: infer ordering flag to teach if operation should define/follow order New flag 'order' is the hint to determine if a function or operation can enforce its ordering requirement or take the ordering already defined. It will be used to fix a couple of ordering bugs, such as: a) 'x & (y | z)' disregards the order of 'x' (issue5100) b) 'x & y:z' is listed from 'y' to 'z' c) 'x & y' can be rewritten as 'y & x' if weight(x) > weight(y) (a) and (b) are bugs of the revset core. Before this, there was no way to tell if 'orset()' and 'rangeset()' can enforce its ordering. These bugs could be addressed by overriding __and__() of the initial set to take the ordering of the other set: class fullreposet: def __and__(self, other): # allow other to enforce its ordering return other but it would expose (c), which is a hidden bug of optimize(). So, in either ways, optimize() have to know the current ordering requirement. Otherwise, it couldn't rewrite expressions by weights with no output change, nor tell how a revset function or operation should order the entries. 'order' is tri-state. It starts with 'define', and shifts to 'follow' by 'x & y'. It changes back to 'define' on function call 'f(x)' or function-like operation 'x (f) y' because 'f' may have its own ordering requirement for 'x' and 'y'. The state 'any' will allow us to avoid extra cost that would be necessary to constrain ordering where it isn't important, 'not x'.

revset: wrap arguments of 'or' by 'list' node This makes the number of 'or' arguments deterministic so we can attach additional ordering flag to all operator nodes. See the next patch. We rewrite the tree immediately after chained 'or' operations are flattened by simplifyinfixops(), so we don't need to care if arguments are stored in x[1] or x[1:].

journal: properly check for held lock (issue5349) The 'jlock' code meant to check for a held lock, but it actually just checking for a lock object. With CPython, this worked because the 'jlock' object is not referenced outside the '_write' function so reference counting would garbage collect it and the '_lockref' would return None. With pypy, the garbage collection would happen at an undefined time and the '_lockref' can still point to a 'jlock' object outside of '_write'. The right thing to do here is not only to check for a lock object but also to check if the lock is held. We update the code to do so and reuse a utility method that exist on 'localrepo' to help readability. This fix journal related tests with pypy.

ssl: handle a difference in SSLError with pypy (issue5348) The SSLError exception is a bit different with pypy (message is the first argument, not the second) This led the certificate error handling to crash when trying to extract the ssl error message. We now handle this different and 'test-https.t' is green again.