Sat, 14 Apr 2018 15:19:36 -0700 wireprotov2: change command response protocol to include a leading map
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 14 Apr 2018 15:19:36 -0700] rev 37725
wireprotov2: change command response protocol to include a leading map The error handling mechanism for the new wire protocol isn't very well-defined. This commit takes us a step in the right direction by introducing a leading CBOR map for command responses. This map will contain an overall result of the command. Currently, the map indicates whether the command was overall successful or if an error occurred. And if an error occurred, that error is present in the map. There is still a dedicated error frame. My intent is to use that for protocol-level errors and for errors that are encountered after the initial response frame has been sent. This will be clarified in a later commit. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3385
Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:37:23 -0700 wireprotov2: change frame type and name for command response
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 14 Apr 2018 14:37:23 -0700] rev 37724
wireprotov2: change frame type and name for command response There was hole at frame type value 3. And the frame is better named as a command response. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3384
Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:11:24 -0700 wireprotov2: change frame type value for command data
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:11:24 -0700] rev 37723
wireprotov2: change frame type value for command data When we dropped the dedicated command argument frame type, this left a hole in our frame type numbering. Let's start plugging that hole. The command data frame is now type value 2 instead of 3. There was limited test fallout because a) we do a good job of using the constants to refer to frame types b) not many tests are sending command data frames. Bumping the media type will be performed in a later commit, once all type value adjustment has been performed. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3383
Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:07:31 -0700 wireprotov2: define response data as CBOR
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 14 Apr 2018 12:07:31 -0700] rev 37722
wireprotov2: define response data as CBOR Previously, response data was defined as a stream of bytes. We had the option to declare it as CBOR using a frame flag. We've converged all wire protocol commands exposed on version 2 to CBOR. I think consistency is important. The overhead to encoding things with CBOR is minimal. Even a very large bytestring can be efficiently encoded using an indefinite length bytestring. Now, there are limitations with consumers not being able to efficiently stream large CBOR values. But these feel like solvable problems. This commit removes the "is CBOR" frame flag from command response frames and defines the frame as always consisting of a stream of CBOR values. The framing protocol media type has been bumped to reflect this BC change. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3382
Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:49:06 -0700 wireprotov2: decode responses to their expected types
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:49:06 -0700] rev 37721
wireprotov2: decode responses to their expected types Callers of established wire protocol commands expect the response from that command to be decoded into a data structure. It's not very useful if callers get back a stream of bytes and don't know how they should be interpreted - especially since that stream of bytes varies by wire protocol and even the transport within that protocol version. This commit establishes decoding functions for various command responses so callers of those commands get the response type they expect. In theory, this should make the version 2 HTTP peer usable for various operations. But I haven't tested to confirm. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3381
Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:46:08 -0700 wireprotov2: establish a type for representing command response
Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> [Sat, 14 Apr 2018 11:46:08 -0700] rev 37720
wireprotov2: establish a type for representing command response It will be desirable to have a higher-level type for representing command responses. This will allow us to do nicer things. For now, the instance encapsulates existing logic. It is still a bit primitive. But we're slowly making things better. Version 1 protocols have a wrapping layer that decodes the raw string data into a data structure and that data structure is sent to the future. Version 2 doesn't yet have this layer and the future is receiving the raw wire response. Hence why debugcommands needed to be taught about the response type. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3380
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip