test: use a more direct form of interruption in fncache "recover" testing The previous test was relying on implementation details and harder to maintain. The new version is closer to the initial intend : "What happens if the process die without cleanup". This change is motivated by further changes around the transaction and dirstate logic that would break the fragile equilibrium that existed before this patch. Making this change early make it easier to review on its own and remove noise in future larger changes.

test: use a more direct approach to test racy mutation The previous test was relying on implementation details and harder to maintain. The new version is closer to the initial intend : "What happens the file get overwritten from under the current process" This change is motivated by further changes around the transaction and dirstate logic that would break the fragile equilibrium that existed before this patch. Making this change early make it easier to review on its own and remove noise in future larger changes.

test: create some history in test-dirstate-backup An empty repository, based on `null` is quite a corner cases. We create a more "natural" setup for this tests to make sure it can keep testing what it intend to test in the future.

test: explicitly "add" file before some commit in test-keyword.t `hg commit -A` will revert the `hg addremove` step if the commit fails. However `hg rollback` currently does not. We are about to improve internal consistency around transaction and dirstate and the behavior of `hg rollback` will align on the other behavior in the process. Before doing so, we make sure the test is using a separate call to `hg add` to avoid the test scenario to be affected by that future change. note: the behavior change for `hg rollback` seems fine as it affect a niche usecase and `hg rollback` usage have been strongly discouraged for a while.

test: explicitly "add" file before some commit in test-filecache.py `hg commit -A` will revert the `hg addremove` step if the commit fails. However `hg rollback` currently does not. We are about to improve internal consistency around transaction and dirstate and the behavior of `hg rollback` will align on the other behavior in the process. Before doing so, we make sure the test is using a separate call to `hg add` to avoid the test scenario to be affected by that future change. note: the behavior change for `hg rollback` seems fine as it affect a niche usecase and `hg rollback` usage have been strongly discouraged for a while.

test: explicitly "add" file before some commit in test-bookmark.t `hg commit -A` will revert the `hg addremove` step if the commit fails. However `hg rollback` currently does not. We are about to improve internal consistency around transaction and dirstate and the behavior of `hg rollback` will align on the other behavior in the process. Before doing so, we make sure the test is using a separate call to `hg add` to avoid the test scenario to be affected by that future change. note: the behavior change for `hg rollback` seems fine as it affect a niche usecase and `hg rollback` usage have been strongly discouraged for a while.

test: explicitly "add" file before some commit in test-rollback.t `hg commit -A` will revert the `hg addremove` step if the commit fails. However `hg rollback` currently does not. We are about to improve internal consistency around transaction and dirstate and the behavior of `hg rollback` will align on the other behavior in the process. Before doing so, we make sure the test is using a separate call to `hg add` to avoid the test scenario to be affected by that future change. note: the behavior change for `hg rollback` seems fine as it affect a niche usecase and `hg rollback` usage have been strongly discouraged for a while.

rhg-files: add support for narrow when specifying a revision This makes it so that `rhg files -r NODE` works properly when using narrow.