rebase: inline _performrebasesubset()
Now that most of _performrebasesubset() has been moved into
_rebasenode(), it's simple enough that we can inline it.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2810
rebase: extract function for rebasing a single node
We currently have _performrebase() and _performrebasesubset(), but we
don't have a method for rebasing a single node (that's inside a loop
in _performrebasesubset()). I think it makes sense to have such a
method, so that's what this patch does. I think it may simplify future
patches I'm working on that have to do with transactions, but I think
this patch makes sense on its own whether or not that future work
happens.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2809
rebase: use configoverride context manager for ui.forcemerge
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2761
rebase: also restore "ui.allowemptycommit" value
It looks like this was lost when the code was converted to the
ui.configoverride() context manager in
f255b1811f5e (rebase: get rid
of ui.backupconfig, 2017-03-16). (And then the bad example was
duplicated in
228916ca12b5 (rebase: add concludememorynode(), and call
it when rebasing in-memory, 2017-12-07).)
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2760
rebase: fix issue 5494 also with --collapse
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2759
rebase: also include commit of collapsed commits in single transaction
When rebase.singletransaction is set, we still used to create a second
transaction when committing with --collapse. It's simpler to create a
single transaction.
Note that in the affected .t file, the test that uses --collapse still
appears to create two transactions (it prints "rebase status stored"
twice). However, only a single transaction is actually created and the
second printout comes from cmdutil.commitforceeditor() that explicitly
calls tr.writepending().
Also note the that we now roll back any commits if the user closes the
commit message editor with an error code (or leaves the message
empty). That might be unfortunate, but it's consistent with how we
behave in the --no-collapse case (if the user passed --edit). If we
want to change that, I think it should be done consistently in a
separate patch.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2728
lfs: debug print HTTP headers and JSON payload received from the server
This has been extremely valuable to show divergences between `hg serve` and
`lfs-test-server`. Once the `hg serve` code lands, there will be a certain
amount of conditionalizing that needs to be done, because `lfs-test-server`
doesn't always follow its spec.
The $ISO_8601_DATE_TIME$ pattern masks the fact that `lfs-test-serve` is sending
out an expires_at value of "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z". `hg serve` will (probably)
use current time + 10 minutes or similar. The $HTTP_DATE$ is the current time.